Both Lisa Ann and Tory Lane don't just suck dicks in this one, they absolutely devour them, moving across (6 in Lisa Ann's scene and 10 in Tory's) thropping upright members like that old parlor game "Musical Chairs"--although the music in this case was the humming sound of a heat generator working overtime. Believe me, these two ladies really went ballistic in the energy they put out for their "blow bang" scenes and when the "cream had settled," you could barely see either of their luscious faces. But then came without a doubt, imho, the absolute DUMBEST line and ending to both scenes that I have ever heard in a porn movie, and which totally ruined the sexual after-glow for me. Instead of letting the camera pan for a long time across the beautiful cum splattered faces and bodies of both Lisa Ann and Tory (the way ANY blow bang scene should end) and let the viewers enjoy the "glaze and glow" of both gorgeous women, some female behind the scenes suddenly yelped "Let's give these ladies a round of applause," like they were some damn sideshow at a circus. Now this is completely my opinion, and I'm sure some of you will disagree, but that stupid ending to both scenes, made my "Mr Happy" drop down South faster than a flock of geese fleeing the Northern Winter winds. Then too, the bts segment, was far too sketchy and NADA for something I always look forward to seeing in adult films-- those very RARE moments when some fetish conscious director will actually think to film lengthy tight camera shots of gorgeous women, such as Lisa Ann and Tory Lane, placing looong all-white cigarettes between their luscious lips and inhaling with deep sexy finesse as "visions of blow jobs" dance in we smoke fetishist heads, a hell of a lot sweeter than sugar plums, btw. There were, of course, other women "taking loads" in MF2 (such as Kristina Rose,Katie St Ives and Brooke Lee Adams) but Lisa and Tory were far and away the most gorgeous "Headcreamers," imho. In conclusion, and even with the sideshow "barker," I completely recommend this film for two simple reasons, Lisa Ann and Tory Lane, either one of which (like a Julia Ann) can make any adult film HOT, but put two of the above dynamic trio together in the same film (such as in Masive Facials 2) and the temperatue goes SOLAR!!....btw, there was thunderous applause for both ladies following their scenes, as I began to look for the "Bearded Lady" in the background.
Oops! I should have written "either one of whom," in the last paragraph of my above review, before any "crudiques," to what I like to call in posts to adult film forums-- CUNTENT!
I thought Kristina Rose's scene was easily the best in the movie. I haven't purchased a porn DVD in well over a year, but after being so impressed with MF1, and then seeing the trailer for this one, I picked it up on drop day. I wasn't even all too familiar with Kristina, as I've been out of the loop on a lot of recent porn, but her performance blew me away. I even thought the BTS with her was really hot because she was in no hurry to get all of the cum off of her face. She just sat around talking and telling stories while her face was dripping, and even had someone take a picture of her cum covered face with her camera phone. I'm definitely going to go back and check out this girl's other movies. The rest of the movie was great too, don't get me wrong, but I was just very impressed with Kristina Rose. Her scene alone was worth the seventeen bucks.
^^ yeah, agreed. If you're not a fan of facials than I'm sure not going to tell you should be. I personally am and I like this series. I won't say "hey don't post here if you don't like facials" but, I do think it would be better suited in the 'over rated, under rated' or 'things in porn I don't understand' threads. Was there really any chance when you read this thread you would have left with a positive comment about a facial movie? Again, no big deal in my eyes, just seems prejudged to your liking. Not to mention it really isn't on the subject. Now that I said that, back on the subject. danl, I can understand disliking the ending applause. I personally am not a huge fan either, of the applause. Though, I have to say the last few seconds of these scenes would be hard pressed to ruin the whole thing for me. In my humble opinion, this goes back to my original statement about personal preference. It sounds like it totally turned you off. For me it was barely noticeable. I would rather see that than any movie that cuts away to show the mans face at orgasm, I just don't like it. You obviously have the right to your opinion, but to me it was far from something that ruined a hot half hour or so, gang blow, facial scene.
pornography wasn't sex but fantasies of an impossibly hospitable world 12377 Posts 9/07
Posted - Jul 24 2010 : 3:54AM
Mason likes to do things that are a little different. I think the cheering at the end makes the scenes feel less about humiliating the female performer and more about making it good perverted fun (same with the women really masturbating through much of the scene). I guess if you're into the group facial thing for the degradation I can see why it may throw the scene a bit for you, but so much of this kind of porn comes across as joyless that I can appreciate the attempt to do something different even though I'm not particularly into facials or large group scenes.
I don't like the ending of these scenes, either. It's astonishing how all the women have an orgasm exactly when the last load blasts over their faces. and then mason starts yelling and cheering and whining, which is absolutely ridiculous. Everyone knows that a lot of things are staged and not real, but just keep playing with the fantasy and don't overact and overreact on it. the voice of mason is another problem imho, pretty annoying...
I just watched the video today, and my favorite scenes were Lisa Ann's and Katie St.Ives'. Interestingly enough, those were the only two that weren't using toys. Not that the other girl's were bad by any means; I mean, they got covered pretty damn well- especially Kristina Rose and Tori Lane, but the toys/orgasm shaking/shrieking noises wasn't my thing. I bet that toy can induce a strong orgasm for a woman, but it was almost a bit too intense for my taste. The other two scenes were fine as well- Brooke Lee Adams and Ashli Orion both had a nice girl next door look to them. Ashli with the skirt and no underwear with knee high socks was an amazingly hot combo (and with her rollerblading around made me think of Heather Graham from the movie Boogie Nights), but she performed rimming in her scene- which I'm sure some guys really love, but it's not my personal fav. I don't mind Mason's voice; I think it's more hot to hear a woman talking to another woman through the intro and whatnot, then to hear a dude talking. I will say though that upon completion of each scene, they should have kept the whole, "yay! that was awesome! gimme a high five!" talk for a behind the scenes section. I know it's a business, so these girls are just clockin' in their hours, but I feel like it really takes away from the perceived sexuality of it all. If after the last cumshot, the girl could do something simple like: sensually lick the cum from their lips; or lightly moaning while rubbibg some of the cum onto their tits/pussy/into mouth; or just blow a kiss to the camera; then end the scene there and fade the camera to black. The post game interview might add the sense of removing any degradation to some, but if the scene is done right, then we shouldn't have the feeling of the female being humiliated. Unless of course the director wants to portray a "sex slave female under the domination of a group of males," then that's a whole other story. I just want for the scene to have the feeling of a female who is sexually confident and has the outlook of the more the merrier.
I don't trust men who don't like big tits. 1067 Posts 12/04
Posted - Jul 25 2010 : 10:34AM
You sound a lil anal/whiny. How that would ruin "the moment" for you is beyond me. And where does this sideshow thing come in, how did you come to that? To me it would've simply come off they did a great job and the director in the moment just wanted the crew to acknowledge it. But nooooooooooooo you got visions of bearded ladies and such. Wtf? Someone running up, squatting and taking a shit would'vbe ruined it for me.
That pretty much sums it up. This was one of the funnest movies I've ever been a part of, and all of the girls and guys did an amazing job. I don't mind trying to tone down the verbal enthusiasm in future editions, but, it is kind of diffifult when such amazing things happen while shooting (Brooke and Kristina come to mind). Massive Facials 1 had similar moments as well (I remember a lot of applause in that one) but, this movie had a lot more "wow" moments (for me at least). But, sure, I can try and contain myself a bit in the future! :)
MF 1&2 are probably the very best movies in this catergory from the past couple years, so don't change too much. Only thing i hope for from this series is that #3 gets to us faster then the second one did.
Nothing says I love you so much as a tongue in the ass. 2884 Posts 1/03
Posted - Jul 25 2010 : 1:38PM
I've watched several scenes over the years where a woman put on a tour de force and was greeted by spontaneous applause by cast and crew. If it's real, keep it. If it shows up in every scene, it seems contrived. As far as seeming like a circus sideshow, we're talking about a blowbang, almost the living definition of circus act. People need to stop investing so much of themselves into these scenes. Go out and smell the roses, so to speak. Appreciate things for what they are, not what they aren't. For my money, Mason's biggest strength is the connection she makes with the women working for her, and the extra enthusiasm that results, regardless of the theme of the moment.
Hey Mason, I haven't seen this particular movie, but I LOVE it when I hear you making comments. It's so awesome to have the focus be on the ladies, and to hear a female voice doing the interview (and with often some un-stereotypical questions too) rather than some other scenes I've watched where you're all hyped up to see a hot woman, and you first get treated with 15 minutes focusing on guys mugging for the camera like they're on the jumbotron at a ballgame.
FWIW, I enjoy Mason's ad lib commentary in the background during the scenes. Some of you guys need to lighten up a little bit. God forbid that anyone should actually enjoy their work and let it show during a scene.
I don't trust men who don't like big tits. 1067 Posts 12/04
Posted - Jul 25 2010 : 2:35PM
You do no such thing. Keep doing what you do, how you do. I like hearing the banter between you and the talent and your enthusiasm ...BUT if you want to switch stuff up a bit, how about giving us some actual screen time of yourself.
Are you saying I sounded anal/whiny in my post? I'm not sure who you were directing your comment towards.
[Link]
MonkeySpank Deactivated User
14 Posts 1/10
Posted - Jul 25 2010 : 4:13PM
In theatre we used to call it, "destroying the illusion" when the cast or production crew did something to remind the audience that this is only a performance... it's not really happening! Originally the intent of catharsis was for audience to become so completely immersed in a performance that they sort of leave reality and engage in the drama. Of course even destroying the illusion has been used to good effect at times--David Letterman made that his hallmark, and Thornton Wilder made extensive use of it in "Our Town". It's a matter of what blows your skirt up. Having seen a few of Mason's directorial endeavors, I come to expect her interaction with talent as typical from her position behind the camera.
I don't trust men who don't like big tits. 1067 Posts 12/04
Posted - Jul 26 2010 : 12:36PM
Yes I was referring to you. Look don't take it too serious or get offended much. It's just my initial knee jerk reaction. Deep down I got to(I guess)respect what you like or don't like. But on the surface, I think it's a dumb reason for a scene to be ruined or somewhat diminished. But hey, do you.
I'm not offended by your response, I just think it's odd that you're quoting me on things I didn't say. I think you're mixing what I said and what the original poster, danl, wrote on this topic because he's the one that said, "...it totally ruined the sexual after-flow' and "'let's give these ladies a round of applause,' like they were some damn sideshow at a circus." If you truly were referring to me, then you kind of took my post out of context and twisted it to an extreme degree. I never said it "ruined the moment" and I'm not exactly sure what you're talking about when you said something about a "sideshow?" Also, I have no clue what you mean by, "visions of a bearded lady and such. wtf?" I'm not following where you're going with that or even what that's referring to from what I wrote. To sum up my original post: when watching the video from a bukkake/blowbang only perspective, it's done very well. Good cumshots and lots of them, which is something people look for in this genre. I followed that up by saying I personally would have found it to be an exceptional video (overall grade of an A instead of an A-), if they excluded the vibrator/"synchronized orgasm" act and done without the "round of applause/post-sex interview" after each scene. I can't speak on your behalf, but if I watch a creampie video and right afterward the guy was like, "oh here, let me grab you a towel so my semen doesn't leak out and stain my 500 thread count Egyptian cotton fitted sheet..." He proceeds to towel her off, then says, "that sure was one heck of a creampie" to which she responds, "indeed it was, sir." To me, that takes away from the sexuality of the scene. I didn't say it RUINS it, but I feel like it lessens the nature of it. I'll say it again that I know it's all an act anyway and porn should be viewed differently than typical cinema, but another example would be at the conclusion of a Hitchcock film (take your pick i.e. North by Northwest, To Catch a Thief, Psycho, etc) if Hitchcock were to come out doing the moonwalk, break dance, then look at the camera and say, "that's all, folks!" then people would be like ehhh wtf was that? The end of each scene in MF2 wasn't done to the aforementioned amplitude that I used for my examples. And it's true that a suspense-thriller movie should be taken more seriously, as opposed to porn which is meant to be fun. All I'm saying is that I would have preferred it if they had left the post-shoot commentary for a behind-the-scenes feature. I agree with danl when he says, "...letting the camera pan for a long time across the beautiful cum splattered faces and bodies of both Lisa Ann and Tory (the way ANY blow bang scene should end) and let the viewers enjoy the "glaze and glow" of both gorgeous women." I made a comment similar to this in my post; that I would have favored if they just keep the ending of each scene simple and sexy. That is all, cerebro jedi.
I don't trust men who don't like big tits. 1067 Posts 12/04
Posted - Jul 26 2010 : 5:56PM
viking1001 Deactivated User
436 Posts 8/05
Posted - Jul 27 2010 : 12:26AM
i thought it SUCKED and not in a good way.eyes shut during facials most the time.i really thought the movie was pretty lame.directors/stars need to watch andi anderson in "brother load" if they want to see a good scene!also courtney cumms' scene in "bakers dozen 6"these are classic!
Mason's interaction always amps things up for me - she's easily my favourite active director, and the misgivings of the OP only make me want to see this more.
The scene I did for Mason in Massive Facials 2 is my most favorite scene I've done all year and hands down the best/most fun blowbang I've ever done in my whole life. I've never had so much fun and our excitement boiling over into an applause for ME the "blower" ruins it? WTF? I enjoy the "girly days" I do with Mason, the talking to the camera with her and all that. That's like OUR day and we just relax and have as much fun as possible while sucking as much dick as possible and while capturing that fun day on camera. But I guess some of you don't like to hear or see us ladies having fun while we suck cock. Nope...some of you just want us to smile and keep our eyes open so you can watch someone cum in 'em. That's cool too...I guess...if Mason were a typical director for a typical company. lol. But she's not and that's why I love her. lol. lol. As usual (I guess this is to be expected), what I feel is one of my most epic sexual experiences* in life (*e.g. My scene with Manuel in Slutwoman), some of you have a problem with how it physically went down. lol. Typical. All I can do is laugh at the irony of it all. If you ask me maybe some of you should be playing with your dicks a little more while really watching these scenes rather than playing Siskel & Ebert. Are you kidding me??? We're comparing "Our Town" & "North by Northwest" to Massive Facials 2???? Wow. For those of you that shouted out props.. Thanks ^_^ I'm sooooo happy you enjoyed it!!! I hope you enjoyed it as much as I did making it but somehow I doubt it. ;P
Very True Kristina, Just having a good spank session is all that porn is about, and I like the fun dialogue in the scenes, it's really kinda disarming and makes the viewer feel more in the action, it's all about having fun, I loved the "blow bus" angle to your scene, that was a cool idea, and I also love the "slutwoman in public" bits you guys too, I'm looking forward to checking out KR is Slutwoman very soon, this one would be on my buy list except i'm personally not into blowbangs, but the trailer looks really good. Edited by - celluloidferox on 7/28/2010 1:18:09 AM
The "girls just having fun" aspect does in fact seperate these movies from the standard blowbang stuff, and i personally love it. Kristina, your scene was amazing, even better then the one in Dirty Girl which was already a favorite.
I think you right.. but I think to expectation was different. If "girls just having fun" then put this movie in private library, not to sale? I watch this twice.. second for sure to make no mistake... looks like "Real Screaming Orgasm" meet "Cum to Cover". Kristina wrote: "My scene with Manuel in Slutwoman)" khem.. so far I can't understand.. why two beautiful people (You & Manuel) make this scene in such disgusting location? Kristina wrote: "some of you just want us to smile and keep our eyes open so you can watch someone cum in 'em". True. As I said expectation was different.:) Kristina wrote: "some of you should be playing with your dicks a little more". I don't have any.. but good guess I think :)
@KristinaRose: I was the one of the people who used a cinematic reference in my prior post. I'm not trying to be an evaluator to the likes of the notables that you mentioned, but I hope you don't become offended if someone thinks, formulates an opinion and offers their critique. I mean, you are a performer, so that goes along with the territory of what you and many other entertainers of all facets encounter. I'm not trying to hate on you in any way. In your scene, when you enter the bus and you're bending over in those cut-off shorts, it was amazingly sexy. I think you're very pretty and you show interest and enthusiasm for what you do, which is awesome. In my post, I cited a film from a highly-regarded director because within the past year or two I've watched a few of his movies, so those were fresh in my mind. I could've used a lesser film like "The Hottie and the Nottie" for my analogy, or I could have used anything between the range of Higgs boson particles to a crappy Chris Daughtry cd. Either way, my message remains the same and just because I used a "sophisticated" movie, that shouldn't detract from my intentions. There is hardly anything in this world that everyone can commonly agree upon. For the most part, I did enjoy your scene. No one is saying they don't like you nor has anyone made any acrimonious remarks towards you- people are just giving their honest assessment. Aside from it all, I'm very glad to hear that you enjoyed the experience of filming with Mason and obviously, you must be doing something right to have all the fans you do and to be successful in your endeavor. Edited by - Agave23 on 7/28/2010 8:09:01 PM
Agave23 wrote: "I mean, you are an actress" no.. A performer. According my knowledge, people involved in porn are performers not actors (actress). But this is old fact :) maybe something was changed? Edited by - Samantha Dennison on 7/28/2010 9:53:01 PM
[Link]
sandman67 Deactivated User
4 Posts 7/10
Posted - Jul 28 2010 : 7:49PM
poorly casted & directed (just saw alot of things i didnt care for)
I don't have a vagina, so I can't masturbate like Kristina does, but I do have a nose. If she picks her nose during a facial, then we could all pick our noses when we watch the scene. Kristina could give us a diner's review of boogers in cum sauce.
There ya go, Dennison, I fixed it for you. However, if you go to Wikipedia and type in "Porn Star," it redirects you to it's entry to "Pornographic Actor," so I don't think I was too off base with my original diction. No big deal though... Edited by - Agave23 on 7/28/2010 8:15:01 PM
Yeah because going to their site, typing "Porn Star" and being redirected to their page entitled "Pornographic Actor (Actress)" was totally unreliable.
ps - What are your experiences with Wiki's "non reliable source of knowledge?" Typical response is that "anyone can go on and edit an article and there are lots of inaccuracies." Which is true, registered use can edit articles, but I just think it's funny when people say that as if everything on the site is erroneous. Wikipedia has 3,350,000+ articles in English and yeah, not 100% of them are perfect, but more times than not it's damn better than most other crap on the internet. I wouldn't use it as a reference for a term paper (because I'd use my University's online library database), but throughout my undergrad I'd use Wikipedia for personal research on different academic topics (i.e. Genetics, Physics, Biochemistry, Organic chemistry, Anatomy & Physiology, etc...). I would have Wiki side-by-side with my class's suggested text book and class notes and I found Wikipedia to be as good, if not better in covering some of the material. I'm sure you're aware that it's no longer 2004; Facebook isn't just for Ivy league students anymore and Wikipedia is monitored for proper citations and edited by page moderator's that delete any fictitious information they come across or that is reported to them. Some cultural references might be slightly off, but for the most part it's a pretty damn good source for information. Welcome to 2010.
no. cos I was eyewitness a couple events in the past.. I was in Rwanda in time civil war between Tutsi and Hutu. I saw almost everything. Story by Wiki this is bunch of lies. I try to change it a couple times. I try to write about catholic priest, who kill dozen Tutsi and later was send to hideout in Belgium. In other words "he was send in new catholic mission" - official statement by local catholic church. Same thing happen in other cases. Wiki try to monopolise history, I mean .. one version for all, with PG rating as well. So far history books was write by scientist, Wiki is writen by computer geeks, who can do copy-paste, mostly without understanding. Not enough? Biology maybe? Go to "Eugenics" and try to find any trace about letters from A. Hitler to US government with thanks for great ideas (I mean sterilisation), which was used in Mein Kampf. You can find error in statistic over here.. not 60.000 but over 215.000 people was sterilised. So don't tell me about Wiki any more. Let be honest.. I really don't know how is legal situation porn performers. I don't want to offend anyone. As I remember.. when you want to be an actor/actress you must be in guild or association? (then you can work as waiter :) in L.A. ). Oldest porn sites don't use a word "Actor/actress" but performer. regards Ps. As I said.. was not my intention to offend anyone, I mean people from Industry. Don't be angry, I'm big fan of yours :)
Posted - Jul 22 2010 : 5:24AM
