New Pornstar Interviews - [more]
Tiny Khloe: 2026 Exxxotica Interview

"I’m attracted to people’s intelligence. I like some substance. I want to be able to hold a conversation."
All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 320 > Men eating their cum ain't cool > Men eating their cum ain't cool (page 2)
Page 2 of 4 First 2 3 > Last
AuthorPost
Gunzo
Senior Member

1377 Posts
2/05
Posted - Mar 23 2007 : 2:50PM
I don't think this is about homophobia at all, I think the issue here is how the focus switches from the girl to the boy, like the classic male face close-up before or during the facial.
turcottes
Member

32 Posts
10/06
Posted - Mar 23 2007 : 4:27PM
Yes, porn police will be stepping in and as I anticipate this will be my final letter let me identify the scenes in question for the person who asked
Mikey& Gia- Cream Pie for the Straight Guy 1.
The Mark Davis scene I don't remember I think he was in a few maybe.Theres a whole series devoted to the topic called "cum in my mouth I'll spit it back in yours".

for the record I don't give a damn about gay sex- whatever floats your boat. I think I said that issue wasn't really my complaint. But can an act between men and women have gay overtones o be gay/bi? I like to watch double anal, but all you hear over at climax corner is how gay it is, and I guess technically they have a point, the two cocks rubbing thing comes as close to gay as it gets I would think. I wouldn't do it, probably because of that reason, but I like watching it if its well done( does that make me a hypocrite?)Another potentially gay position is that DP position where the girl rest on her shoulders upside down with her ass way up in the air and her feet by her head, and two guys dp her facing each other- thats WAY too close for comfort in my opinion.

But as I said if eating cum is done in the context of domination cool. If Ariana Jollee demanded it, who could say no? To do it on your own with no prompts seem pathological and deviant. Who cares though, too each his own. I just thought I'd bring it up, life and porn always go on.

BustdownGal
Member

539 Posts
7/06
Posted - Mar 23 2007 : 5:08PM
This thread has spawned a discussion of homophobia and misogyny over here.

but...on this thread, wow! from "just a preference" to "pathological and deviant" in 60 seconds. Man that heterosexism handles well! Does it get good gas mileage driving over gay rights?

I know it's hard to see baby love. I know it is! When you are mired in smog you think that the air you know is the only kind of air there is. But your glibness, and others' glibness, in tossing off (pun intended) this harsh double standard reveals more than you may even realize.

Let's transfer this to your own bedroom. How do you think a sexual partner would feel if you tossed off in her face then treated her with the disgust you're displaying toward cum? How do you think she would feel at the moment of realization that this fluid you just shot off in her mouth was too disgusting for you, but not too disgusting for her?

I'll tell you how that would make her feel: lower than you. But that's what you want, right? "Eat my cum, you [insert derogatory name of choice]. Haha! I'm the man and you're the woman, on your knees with my body's garbage in your mouth. And since I'm a nice guy, I'll get you some Listerine and a warm towel. But don't get any on me! I'm no fag!"

Fag - hetero dude slang for "man who acts like woman."

Edited by - BustdownGal on 3/23/2007 5:55:02 PM

Dither
Persona non grata

I love America
650 Posts
8/05
Posted - Mar 23 2007 : 6:03PM
Not an option. Flushing her down the toilet isn't feasible.
 
BustdownGal
Member

539 Posts
7/06
Posted - Mar 23 2007 : 6:08PM
And the other questions I asked Dither? Go ahead and answer them. Please, show us your glib prowess.
Dither
Persona non grata

I love America
650 Posts
8/05
Posted - Mar 23 2007 : 6:28PM
I don't do things to other people against their will, and I expect them not to do anything to me against my will. Then love's lost. That's my concept of equality, not the submissiveness you're apparently looking for. If appreciating your femininity requires robbing men of their masculinity, then you're the sexist, the misandrist.

I choose the porn that floats my boat, consenting participants is definetely a criterion. The rest is down to my individual preferences, I don't buy porn to make a political statement. It's all fantasies anyway.

BustdownGal
Member

539 Posts
7/06
Posted - Mar 23 2007 : 6:56PM
Holy Shit, Dither. You are so fucking money and you don't even know it, bro. I am bookmarking this thread as a shining example of how clueless the average Western man is about his own need to dominate women, right down to his fantasies. He is, in fact, so clueless that he freely admits it and doesn't realize that he justifies and fuels every feminist out here.

Homophobia (ho mo FO bi yuh) n. insecurity about being heterosexual

Dither
Persona non grata

I love America
650 Posts
8/05
Posted - Mar 23 2007 : 8:01PM
The western man...something tells me you've not been to Africa or the Middle East, where feminists are really needed to fight for womens rights. To the stark contrast of mainstream porn where you already pretty much rule the scene (more money, more fame et cetera). It's like fucking Bill Gates asking for allowances, I say turn your focus to where it's actually needed, this is much more worthy.

But by all means, bookmark all you want, run your ignorant feminist crusade. Piss on all the women and gays who really struggle, just so you can throw a punch at whatever man who happens to cross your path. I couldn't care less, I get along just fine, so do my female acquaintances, and gays even. Have a nice life.

Edited by - Dither on 3/23/2007 8:09:58 PM

the unknown pervert
Deactivated User

I'd like to stay but I've got a plane to catch.
3243 Posts
5/06
Posted - Mar 23 2007 : 8:15PM
I'm on Dither's side on this. I like dp scenes and even some dap scenes and these could certainly be argued to be more homoerotic than the subject of this thread. Bustdown seems to think that homophobia is the only reason why someone wouldn't watch these types of scenes. I want my porn to focus on the woman not the man. I think it is safe to say that most males who watch porn feel the same otherwise studios could have saved themselves a whole lot of money and just filmed Ron Jeremy sucking himself.
BustdownGal
Member

539 Posts
7/06
Posted - Mar 23 2007 : 9:03PM
*BustdownGal raises her sword of Justice toward the sun*

BY THE POWER OF HERA, FORM MECHA-BUSTDOWNGAL!

*The Porn Pool rumbles as all the metal in this thread begins to quiver and hurl itself toward BustdownGal, forming a shining and multicolored 100-foot tall super-specimen of invincibility*

*I squint*

*A glint from Hera's star reflects down my eyelid as I move my pupils at a rapid pace to assess my targets*

*I bow to you all, then beckon you with a word...

"Go" I whisper.

From the getgo, turcottes, you establish the act of eating cum as something that "subs" do. In the above words you reveal that although men can "play" sub, the natural sub in life's order of things is Woman. When the way you see life's order is disrupted, you are disgusted. You are turned off. When the spooge from your own body that you gladly spurt onto a woman ends up back on the body of the Man, your natural domme in the order of things, you are disgusted. You don't want to see it. In your conceptualization of sexuality, there is always the dominant and submissive, and that dominant is always Man and that submissive is always Woamn. Unless they're "playing". When there is no "play", and your natural order is disrupted by the dominant, Man, committing an act that only the submissive, Woman, should do, you exhort that this is an abomination that should "NEVER" be shown to others. Notice you didn't even hold back and say "I don't want to see that." You exclaimed that this blasphemy should be banned and not shown to ANYONE. Sure, you may never support such actual legislation. But you have plainly shown how deeply you hate the idea of seeing a man licking his own disgusting cum...which makes the female recipient of that cum a garbage can.

This harsh double standard is why feminists fight. Because it's this deep-set attitude that women are less than men within the bedrooms...no...within the very *minds* of men that leads to every single expression of inequality toward women. Men don't get to hide in their fantasies. Oh no, baby doll. Because only autistics stay in their minds. Human thoughts are not disconnected from our actions, so there is no place where human discourse should not allowed to flourish and examine. So don't gimme that "it's just my fantasies!" We're goin' in, baby. Dive! Dive!

And don't get all mad because I've called you and Bornyo, Dither, etc. on your shit. I've asked you to be accountable for the harsh double standard you've proudly labelled an entire thread with. So now I'd like you to at least fess up to it like Dither did, and then we can move on from there.

Bornyo didn't like the wording of ma meeshka's awesome question "is the general rule that each person should only taste/consume the other's bodily fluid or is there a double standard where she does everything and you do as little as you want?" So notice how he answered the part he saw error with as opposed to the center of the question "Is there a double standard?" Even after ma meeshka re-worded, where was Bornyo? No where.

We like to shout out our sins:

But we disappear when it's time to justify these unfair double standards against women.

turcottes, what really made me explode was this:

This linking of cum-eating to Jon's death just shuts down completely the part of my netiquette that doesn't want to call to task someone who only has 16 posts. I mean, how dare you imply that Jon was gay, one, and two, how dare you imply that being secretly gay might have had anything to do with his death?? That's disrespectful on so many levels, dude. He was doing a scene with a woman, for Cripe's sake! So because he thinks his own cum tastes good, he's gay? So because he thinks that he can eat what he makes women eat, that makes him gay?

You have shown that so much of being gay in homophobe's eyes has *nothing* to do with same-gender-sex. It has to do with not imposing dominant behavior over every woman you encounter. And any man who behaves in a way that looks like he's treating women equally, then he's "gay".

"unknown queer"...jesus christ!

SHING!
*Mecha-BustdownGal pulls sword out of turcotte's body*
"Hello again, Ramsey," I say with a voice as cold as my Adamantium Arbiter.

Now Ramsey's on the bandwagon. "If the man isn't making the woman do something that he won't do, it's not straight sex. Not only that but it's irregular." And Ramsey wants us to put warning labels on our movie sleeves.

"Warning: men and women treat each other equally in this video. Don't watch if you think that women should do salacious sexual shit that men don't have to. Don't watch if you think women should be fucked, pissed on, splooged on then run away from by the fuckers, pissers and sploogers as if they were litterboxes."

*Mecha-BustdownGal shakes Ramsey's life-force off her sword and grabs Dither. His legs are still running even though I've lifted him off the ground*

"I will have mercy on you because you were honest," I whisper.

*A silver tear falls slowly from Mecha-BustdownGal's metallic eye. She drops Dither and doesn't chase after him.*

How much richer this conversation could be if everyone just fessed up to the obvious double standard of "men eating hteir cum ain't cool, but women eating men's cum is way cool." Then we could explore questions like

"Why is that your preference?"
"Why do you put up with this unfairness in yourself?"
"Do you see how this double standard would make a female sexual partner feel like you thought she was less of a person than you?"
"How do you think a woman in your real life would feel knowing that you fantasize about human toilets? Called a human toilet not because you cum on it...but because of the disgust you feel *after* you've cum on it? Because you treat the cum from your own body like waste to be flushed. Down HER throat."

The attitudes many have unwittingly revealed here, are what anti-porn feminists are complaining about. If you've ever wondered why they're hating on us, this is it. This is the dead center of it. This root-level belief that sex is as much about dominating another as it is about the pleasure of sex itself.

It is a self-delusion to believe that a double standard in your sexuality will never make it out of your head, or out of your bedroom. It will escape into the real world. It HAS to. It's our sexuality. It's so central to our personality. We never interact with the world without our sexuality present, influencing our interactions in small and large ways.

So, are we going to be real enough with ourselves as porn fans to discuss this in an honest way in the only place we're safe to open up about it?


Edited by - BustdownGal on 3/24/2007 10:45:53 AM

melpster
Member

582 Posts
5/05
Posted - Mar 23 2007 : 9:17PM
Oh my.
benderset
Deactivated User

477 Posts
8/06
Posted - Mar 23 2007 : 9:18PM
+1 on avoiding all his movies
BigMatt
Member

Sunrise Adams, Queen of Cute.
498 Posts
12/04
Posted - Mar 23 2007 : 9:37PM
*applauds BustdownGal*

This needed to be said.

turcottes
Member

32 Posts
10/06
Posted - Mar 23 2007 : 11:08PM
Holy shit! Write a damn book, Who gives a fuck? But I guess I have to try again....

Turcottes:
Now Mickey, he always was a cum eating freak, it worked with Missy because she played the domme so well. But his scene with gia paloma, was just sick- Gia didn't give a damn, and mickey went out of his way to have her shit the cum into his mouth...Men eating their own cum is something best done in private- NEVER to be recorded for posterity.

From the getgo, turcottes, you establish the act of eating cum as something that "subs" do. In the above words you reveal that although men can "play" sub, the natural sub in life's order of things is Woman.
_______________________________________________________

Give me a break, As I've said on numerous occasions and as you've ignored, I stated that it was fine as long as it is within some type of natural flow. "never to be recorded for posterity". I'll take that part back , somewhat. After all as I said, I had no problem with mickeys antics with Missy, including the classic strap on scene from Beyond Reality and all the rest. I had the highest respect for Mickey and regarded him as the heir to Jamie Gillis. But this particular scene with Gias indifference was repugnant.Yes men eating spunk outside the context of domination is best done in private, it makes for bad porn. I stand by that statement and if it makes me an oppressor then so be it.

When the way you see life's order is disrupted, you are disgusted. You are turned off. When the spooge from your own body that you gladly spurt onto a woman ends up back on the body of the Man, your natural domme in the order of things, you are disgusted. You don't want to see it.

I didnt say that- see Arianna Jolie comments.

In your conceptualization of sexuality, there is always the dominant and submissive, and that dominant is always Man and that submissive is always Woamn.
Unless they're "playing".

Thats such garbage. I never said that and I don't believe it.

You exclaimed that this blasphemy should be banned and not shown to ANYONE.

I said that its best done in private, and although I did make all inclusive statement I obviously qualified it later. Calm down, I didn't have any reservations when mickey licked it off a toilet seat, because it followed the logic of the scene.

And don't get all mad because I've called you and Bornyo, Dither, etc. on your shit. I've asked you to be accountable for the harsh double standard you've proudly labelled an entire thread with.

Yes I proudly stand by the threads title with the aforementioned exceptions which I delineated before your protestations.I mean for gods sake "swallow my squirt 1" was my favorite movie last year, with three of the best scenes ever( Tianna Ariana/ Tucci/ angela stone)I only enjoyed that because it was "play"?


So now I'd like you to at least fess up to it like Dither did, and then we can move on from there.

turcottes:
Speaking as a man, and not as a professional psychologist, and knowing his previous status in porn, I wonder if that particular scene had anyting to do with the end. I mean seriously, its one thing for an unknown queer to be eating his own spunk entirely another for Jon Dough to be doing it.

This linking of cum-eating to Jon's death just shuts down completely the part of my netiquette that doesn't want to call to task someone who only has 16 posts. I mean, how dare you imply that Jon was gay, one, and two, how dare you imply that being secretly gay might have had anything to do with his death?? That's disrespectful on so many levels, dude. He was doing a scene with a woman, for Cripe's sake! So because he thinks his own cum tastes good, he's gay? So because he thinks that he can eat what he makes women eat, that makes him gay?

Let me preface the following statements by reiterating that Jon Dough was one of my favorite woodsmen. He was obviously a legend I can barely even remember how long he was in porn, did he go back to the 80's even? I followed his career for years and saw his best fucks.He fucked em all, Kim Kyle, Kitty Yung, Audrey Hollander,there wasn't a major star he didn't do and do well. That having been said over the last 10 years I feel like I know the man. He was A MAN, and as a man I can imagine his thoughts and his guilt from having done this act, men like him just don't do that, I'm sorry if that offends you. It has already been confirmed by his partner in the scene that he was repulsed by it. My feelings on it had nothing to do with him being gay. I simply felt sorry for him that his career had been brought to that point. I started to think about how him and Mark Davis(although Mark unlike Jon has tasted his own cum from the beginning of his career and seems to enjoy it) must feel at being overshadowed by the new generation of wood.

And lastly don't blame men for being dominant after millions of years of evolution, women tend to accept it as well, just go to alt.com and compare the number of female subs with female dommes. theres no comparison, its like 1000 to 1. Is that a function of socialization. BULLSHIT!

You have shown that so much of being gay in homophobe's eyes has *nothing* to do with same-gender-sex. It has to do with not being imposing dominant behavior over every woman you encounter. And any man who behaves in a way that looks like he's treating women equally, then he's "gay".

"unknown queer"...jesus christ!

SHING!
*Mecha-BustdownGal pulls sword out of turcotte's body*


HAHAHHAHAHA, me bested by you?!!!!!! Thats the funniest shit I've heard in weeks! You've ignored every qualification that I've made over this entire thread. "And any man who behaves in a way that looks like he's treating women equally, then he's "gay"."Is this what your argument boils down to? Did I not confess in an earlier post to being a fan of Silvera's strap attack? I could go on but why bother, you're probably to drunk on war nog to read.

 
turcottes
Member

32 Posts
10/06
Posted - Mar 23 2007 : 11:15PM
Oh yeah, and by the way. My name "turcottes" it refers to Karen Turcotte athlete and sex Goddess from way back and its used in the possessive.SHe used ot make me watch bi porn when I fucked her sometimes, I compromised because she liked it. So much for my misogyny and need to be dominant.

If you're out there Karen- Luv ya babe!

justalurker
Member

241 Posts
8/03
Posted - Mar 23 2007 : 11:15PM
My eyes hurt.

People, please learn to quote correctly or don't bother at all.

Hint: There is a preview button you can use to see what your post is going to look like before posting.

renejohn
Member

Melbourne , Australia
102 Posts
2/02
Posted - Mar 24 2007 : 12:03AM
greetings
we cant believe all the fuzz I'm mean with all the shit happening around the world 'cum'on
we just got back from Europe and the guys there are generally more liberal and don't carry on like the Americans guys even under the nose of the pope in Italy the italians guys don't throw labels at each other sex is fun for stop>>>>>. take Rocco movies there is plenty of kinky stuff going on Does it mean he must be that dreaded word a bit of a Poof!!!!! opps sorry gay.

now what were these titles with these hot scenes where guys eat cum filled pussy??????
cheersps


john & rene

barrybrn
Senior Member

1568 Posts
9/03
Posted - Mar 24 2007 : 10:07AM
are there any male performers that ramsey likes?
Bornyo
Deactivated Member

803 Posts
12/04
Posted - Mar 24 2007 : 3:51PM
That's beautiful. You should have identified yourself.
Redish All-Star Supporter
Poetic Moderator

Long and Cursive road to the Ivory Pagoda in the province of Loraine
4076 Posts
12/03
Posted - Mar 24 2007 : 4:22PM
+1

Raoul Duke
Member

When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro
306 Posts
2/07
Posted - Mar 24 2007 : 5:35PM
Okay, see, Here is where you lost any pretense of rationality and entered into a dark twilight wherein anyone who so much as looks at you cockeyed is a Homophobe, a Mysogenist, and an Oppressor. (Wait, is "cockeyed" a mysoginistic term? Aaahhh, Fuckit.)This is a very serious case, the likes of which I haven't seen since my undergraduate days. Most serious, indeed. Ordinarily, I would prescribe the standard "Lockwood Cocktail" of Lithium, Depakote and Risperdal. But in my expert opinion, the case presented calls for Drastic Measures. I'm ordering 50,000 CCs of Raw Thorazine, STAT.


Edited by - Raoul Duke on 3/24/2007 8:18:48 PM

Ramsey
Senior Member

Trina Michaels fan
10332 Posts
10/02
Posted - Mar 24 2007 : 6:18PM
You can analyze this all you want BustdownGal but after 20 years of porn watching I'm not about to accept this all of sudden reverse roles thing. That's why I said I'm old school and eventhough I do believe porn should have their evolution, I want to decide what for me is watchable and what's not. That's why I'm against this mixing it up with regular porn.

Ramsey
Senior Member

Trina Michaels fan
10332 Posts
10/02
Posted - Mar 24 2007 : 6:22PM
Dave Cummings, Rodney Moore, Jean-Yves Lecastel, Jack Napier, Maxx Black, Richard Mann, Boz, Richard Mann, Nathan Treat, Jon Jon, Charlie Mac, Justin Slayer and Ramon and my all time favorite Lil'Pimp Hand for example.
melpster
Member

582 Posts
5/05
Posted - Mar 25 2007 : 12:23AM
Actually I got pretty excited because I suddenly thought we starting up a LARP. I was gonna go get my 12-sided dice.
 
Joe_Kurtz
Member

129 Posts
4/06
Posted - Mar 25 2007 : 11:19AM
So, you don't get your rug munched, or are you just that flexible?

Yes, guys eating cum is nasty, don't want to see it, couldn't give less of a shit if that makes me a homophobe or whatever new age faggy bullshit psychobabble.

Edited by - Joe_Kurtz on 3/25/2007 11:21:19 AM

LeeScott
Member

Glasgow, Scotland
77 Posts
5/06
Posted - Mar 25 2007 : 1:11PM
Bustdowngal,

Why cant you accept that porn and sex in general is all about "different strokes for different folks" instead of trying to force you point of view on people.

My opinion (and it is only that) is that there is nothing wrong with men that want to watch a man eat his own cum, if thats what he is into. You will find that the vast majority of guys are not into this, just because it isnt his thing.

It has nothing to do with being disrespectful or dominant over women or anything like that, if you truly feel this way then I believe that you are entitled to your opinion on the matter.

With regards to girl swallowing cum, you will probably find that these girls enjoy pleasing their partners and many eventually enjoy doing it. How many guys when they first went down on a woman though into themselves "this is disgusting" but got turned on by how much their girlfriend was enjoying it? And how many of these guy got used to the taste and enjoy any opportunity they get to do this.

Of course, there will always be men that dont go down on women, and women who dont go down on men. Everyone has their own taste, be it heterosexual, bi-sexual or homosexal and its each to her or his own.

For me , I personally do not want to watch this in a film? Why? because it does not turn me on. Just like I dont want to what a Scat film etc there is no reason for me to watch this.

I guess a lot of guys feel the same, and it is quite funny to see the storm that has brewed out of a tea cup.

Regards,

Lee

Edit for spelling error, sorry!

Edited by - LeeScott on 3/25/2007 1:12:27 PM

Kelly Allen
Deactivated User

N/A
2 Posts
10/06
Posted - Mar 25 2007 : 1:51PM
Another day, another psychotic break on ADT....
YankNSpank
Member

jumping in on you
29 Posts
1/07
Posted - Mar 25 2007 : 5:50PM
Ya, well apparently the amazon queen doen't like people stating their turn offs in a forum about porn. Whatever.

Personaly, in the last 3 years I haven't bought a porn video that DIDN'T have a female giving the strap-on to a guy. (It's called "pegging" BTW)I love it when my wife does me. Why? There is a thrill to see a woman in such a dominant position and to see her taking that position seriousy. I like it when she takes control. So is that wrong? Sometimes she leads when we dance and decides what movie we go to. I don't know how that upsets the universe; to have one in the position to lead while the other follows, especially if it is done with agreement and the roles change with the wind.

I don't prefer the whole sucking on a strap -on thing because it isn't touching any "sex-nerve" and is all for show, but my wife gets off on the visual so I do it.

Its all about the sensation in the anus and watching my wife bang me. Hot as hell if you let yourself get into it.

Now I realise that there are lots of posters in this forum saying "ewwww gross", but they read it anyway and respect my desire, perhaps with judgement and a pledge that they would never do such a thing, but who cares? It's my body my sex life and my marriage.

All that said, what do I say when the inevitable accusation of being gay comes forth? "It's not like I want some dude doing it."

And it's true. It wouldn't be what my _wife_ does to me and a guy just don't turn me on.
Have I eaten my own cum? sure, somewhere somehow. I don't make it a point to remember these things, but do I want to see some other guy swallow his? Not really.
But if my wife said it would turn her on I'd do it in a heartbeat.

second point, this board is where people talk about porn. Porn is a product. It is enjoyed in the privacy of your own home. If it doesn't turn you on it isn't doing what you paid for. This BS about "face your homophobia" is just that BS. If you bought a lesban movie expecting nothing but hotness and there was a 5 minute interlude of some guys hairy balls bouncing, you might want to think about complaining. Hell, I'd even back you up.

A better use of your time might be to figure out who told all the kids to say that anything that they don't like is to be labeled "gay." From Ice cream to cars to stepping in dog sh_it.
<second edit break>Oh, and BTW, I think every female porn star should strap one on and do ChristianX with "Groove is in the Heart as the soundtrack. My wife likes him and I think he is the best in the genre.

Edited by - YankNSpank on 3/25/2007 6:14:22 PM

Raoul Duke
Member

When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro
306 Posts
2/07
Posted - Mar 25 2007 : 6:08PM
And what is this "US"? By your own admission, you're a lesbian and, judging by your ramblings, a militant, man-hating lesbian with a serious chemical imbalance. Ergo, one may safely conclude that you, BustdownGal, are not going to "eat it," by virtue of your status as militant, man-hating, chemically imballanced lesbian. Why, then, would you presume to speak on behalf of those Hetero women that may or may not chose to "eat it," if that's what floats their boat? Speak for yourself, and stop trying to impose your position on others.

Edited by - Raoul Duke on 3/26/2007 3:01:01 AM

BigMatt
Member

Sunrise Adams, Queen of Cute.
498 Posts
12/04
Posted - Mar 25 2007 : 8:21PM
BustdownGal was right on the money on the most important point. The fact that several people DID label something as "gay" although it only entailed a man and a woman. But not only that, they did also talk about it in a deragatory way and even imply a link between this supposed "gay" behavior and suicide. That DOES show some dysfunctional thinking as well as issues with homosexuals.

As for the rest that this thread has developed into, I don't think BustdownGal would deny you the right to not like something.

As I said earlier, I lose interest if a guy drinks his own cum in a porn movie. However kissing a woman on the mouth or licking her body after cumming on her, I don't have a problem with. That's the limit for what I enjoy and do not enjoy. And that's ok. I just don't judge other people on where they draw their lines, as long as they're not being offensive or deragatory.

BigMatt
Member

Sunrise Adams, Queen of Cute.
498 Posts
12/04
Posted - Mar 25 2007 : 8:29PM
And no, we guys don't have to eat it. But neither does our partners if they don't want to.

Try to look at it this way:

  • A girl gets turned on on guys eating their own cum. She wants her boyfriend to do it but he refuses.

  • A guy wants his girlfriend to eat his cum. She refuses.

If you agree that no one has the more right to critisize the other, we are on the right track.

Raoul Duke
Member

When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro
306 Posts
2/07
Posted - Mar 25 2007 : 8:46PM
She most certainly attempts to deny people the right not to like something. By labling anyone who doesn't like this particular act "Homophobes," "Mysogenists," and "Oppressors, she is demonizing all those who express an opinion contrary to hers. As is typical of the zealot, she tramples on diversity in the name of promoting "diversity," as defined by her and her alone. As for those who have called the act of eating one's own ejaculate "gay," they are not exhibiting homophobia thereby. There is an undeniable element of Homoeroticism in a man eating semen, and "Gay" is the acceptable word in our society for referring to Homosexuality. It would be a different story if they had referred to the Actors who ate their own cum as "Fucking Faggots." Then I would agree that there's some Homophobia or even latent Homosexuality involved. But they didn't, so her entire premise is without merit.

Personally, I don't think that someone eating their own cum is particularly Gay, any more than Ron Jeremy sucking his own cock is. (Why does a Dog lick his balls?) It is not, however, something I would enjoy watching and I would sincerely like to see it labled on the box, so that I can avoid it. Or, conversely, so that someone who enjoys it can buy it.

And where does the "suicide" come in, or am I missing something?

Raoul Duke
Member

When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro
306 Posts
2/07
Posted - Mar 25 2007 : 8:53PM
I agree that people should do and watch whatever they want to, whenever they want to. As I said, "Gay" is the accepted word for Homosexuality in our society and there is an inherent element of Homoeroticism involved in a man eating semen. There is nothing "wrong" with this, but the Homoeroticism is nonetheless there. Thus, to refer to that act as "Gay" is not to be Homophobic, but to use the proper word for it. BustdownGal's repeated use of the terms "Homophobe," "Mysogenist," and "Oppressor" demonstrate an extreme intollerance while purporting to champion tollerance (with her "Sword of Justice," nonetheless.) It's simply typical behaviour for a zealot.
BigMatt
Member

Sunrise Adams, Queen of Cute.
498 Posts
12/04
Posted - Mar 25 2007 : 8:56PM
Someone alluded to that Jon Dough was falling apart and that a scene with cum-eating was proof of it.

I guess we interpret BustdownGal a bit differently. I do NOT agree with her that "we" have to eat it for our girlfriends to eat it. BUT I think she makes some good points, and the points I described were directed at people who deliberately label things as gay just because it crosses their lines.

If her critisism was directed at the majority of people posting here, I think it is misguided. But if it is directed at the few people who made the most categoric statements using the terms "gay" about things they themselves had a strong dislike for, I think she has a good case.

 
BigMatt
Member

Sunrise Adams, Queen of Cute.
498 Posts
12/04
Posted - Mar 25 2007 : 9:01PM
Is it then "gay" (or "lesbian" if you want) if a girl masturbates herself and licks the juice off her own fingers?
BustdownGal
Member

539 Posts
7/06
Posted - Mar 25 2007 : 10:38PM
thank you BigMatt.
Raoul Duke
Member

When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro
306 Posts
2/07
Posted - Mar 25 2007 : 10:52PM
Hardware All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

Your other left
14595 Posts
3/02
Posted - Mar 25 2007 : 11:14PM
Bah, this is absurd. A guy eating his own semen is auto-erotic, not homo-erotic. Do you pick your nose? You do? Great, wanna pick mine? No? Well, I guess there is a difference, after all.

BTW, in how many scenes have you watched guys masturbate in porn? Are you gay, now? You've been watching a guy stroke his cock.

skronker
Notable Legendary Icon

Scopophiliac
9780 Posts
9/02
Posted - Mar 25 2007 : 11:26PM
Can't make an omlette without cracking a few eggs.
Unless you use Eggos.
justalurker
Member

241 Posts
8/03
Posted - Mar 25 2007 : 11:45PM
+1

While I don't care if a guy does it. I think it's much more sexier when a girl does it.

Raoul Duke
Member

When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro
306 Posts
2/07
Posted - Mar 25 2007 : 11:45PM
Hardware, the auto-eroticism of the act does not inherently preclude the homo-erotic element that is also present. Like I said, I don't really think it's any more "Gay" than Ron Jeremy sucking his own cock, which may be the most auto-erotic act ever caught on tape. Yet it still contains a Homo-Erotic element, by the very fact that he is sucking a cock. The more Important question is whether calling it "Gay", or even the mere fact that someone chooses not to watch the act makes one a "Homophobe," a "Mysogenist," or an "Oppressor," as BustdownGal repeatedly asserts. I say not. As I noted above, the problem with BustdownGal's logic is that it's either/or, black & white and does not allow for alternatives. Moreover, it shows an incredible intolerance for anyone who doesn't see things her way. Fanatics are like that. If she wasn't a radical lesbian, she'd fit in well with Jerry Falwell, Jimmy Swaggart and company.
AztecGold11
Member

514 Posts
8/05
Posted - Mar 26 2007 : 12:00AM
chaotic_23
Member

339 Posts
1/06
Posted - Mar 26 2007 : 12:06AM
See, if I'd seen that trailer, I might have rented the movie, but the pics that _were_ on the box cover turned me off enough to not give it a chance. So I agree the strap-on scene should have been clearly advertised, but for different reasons.
But, but, the "subtle" sexism of western culture is SO MUCH worse than the overt kind, because it lets Evil Pawns of the Patriarchy LIKE YOU claim that Western Culture is less sexist. And if you claim that that argument was circular, then that prove that it's right! Or something.
I'd agree with you, except their (Devil's Films) scenes aren't done very well. If the guys were to dive in tongue first and actually _eat_ the cream pies, it would be hot. But the girl's crotch hovering a foot above his open mouth while patiently waiting for gravity to do its job? Boooor-ing. Now, Joey Silvera would probably do this sort of scene right, if only Evil Angel would change their no-cream-pie policy...
And that's why I'm _for_ mixing it in, so that the newer generation will be innoculated against the hangups of the old, and the acts in question will eventually become 'main stream' and appear in all movies, while 'old school' prudes like Ramsey weep in despair. MWAHAHAHAHAAAA! ;-)
Hardware All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

Your other left
14595 Posts
3/02
Posted - Mar 26 2007 : 1:14AM
I'm really not here to defend BustdownGal's view. My problem started long before she entered the fray. It is a concern yet to be resolved. To whit, I perceive a selective blindness on the part of certain posters which leads them to only see 'gayness' in acts they dislike.

Dragging in Ron Jeremy sucking his own cock does nothing to disabuse me of the notion, as the subject at hand is a man having sex with a woman, then eating his ejaculate.

Obviously, a man having sex with a woman isn't usually considered homo-erotic fare. So, we've got a scene that is 99% undeniably male/female sex, with 1% open to question.

As I pointed out last time, proportionally, I don't see the difference between this and a guy jerking off to completion after having sex with a female performer. Surely, the guy jerking off is just as open to a homo-erotic interpretation as the guy eating his own ejaculate.

That being the case, I'm left wondering if people are merely applying the dubious logic that what turns them off must turn homosexual males on. Either that, or we're back to 'gay' being a code-word for bad and disgusting, which, come to think of it, might explain why BustdownGal is so upset.

Raoul Duke
Member

When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro
306 Posts
2/07
Posted - Mar 26 2007 : 1:28AM
Again, I don't think "Gay" is being used as a codeword, but a description of the Homo-Eroticism inherent in the act. If they meant it to be a put down, they'd have used more intemperate language. The guys jerking off is as irrelevent as you seem to think Ron Jeremy is, but personally, that's when I hit the Fast Forward button. It's not something I particularly care to see, although I recognize that, like it or not, it's become standard in the industry and it's here to stay. BustdownGal can be as upset as she pleases. It's a free country. But she crosses a line when she starts labeling every male a "Homophobe," a "Mysogenist," or an "Oppressor." I went to High School in the West Village, believe in equal rights and, as far as I know, have never oppressed anybody. I am none of these things, yet, according to her, because I don't want to see a man eat his own cum, I am all of the above. That is my problem, here. That and the fact that she seems to be in need of some serious medication with this "Sword of Justice" nonsense.


Edited by - Raoul Duke on 3/26/2007 4:12:51 AM

Endless Loop
Senior Member

Tomatometer
1129 Posts
8/04
Posted - Mar 26 2007 : 3:55AM
Some watch porn from a voyeuristic perspective, and see two people engaged in intimate sexplay.
Where I can see the offense many take by this, is that others watch porn with the perspective of vicariously performing the male role.
When that guy turns the tables, and drinks his cum, these viewers only see him drinking cum.
Any notion about it being his, or anybody elses for that matter, gets lost in the general aversion of the act, and the whole scenario gets flushed from the mind, along with any potential aftertaste.


Edited by - Endless Loop on 3/26/2007 4:09:27 AM

AlexPanzer
Deactivated User

1593 Posts
6/03
Posted - Mar 26 2007 : 4:09AM
Definatly not cool. Do it on your own/private time, but on on video.
scipio
Senior Member

1901 Posts
2/00
Posted - Mar 26 2007 : 5:17AM
It was pretty much the quality of the LARPers I've seen. Unfortunately this thread makes me sad in quite a few ways. I'm off to WoW, I think.

BigMatt
Member

Sunrise Adams, Queen of Cute.
498 Posts
12/04
Posted - Mar 26 2007 : 7:31AM
Agreed. People were just 10-20 years ago covering their eyes to A2M and DP, now it is quite common. I am all for "innoculating" people to things that are completely harmless by themselves. Now, myself I do not enjoy watching A2M, DP or even most anal scenes. But it's not like I'm repulsed or scared by it, and that fact is a good thing. No reason to fear it.
Raoul Duke
Member

When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro
306 Posts
2/07
Posted - Mar 26 2007 : 7:50AM
Not wanting to watch it is not the same as being afraid of it. If that's your thing, Fine. Go for it. I, however, chose not to. When I buy a product, any product, I buy it in good faith, fully expecting it to be as represented on the box. So for there to be men eating cum on a purportedly hetero porn flick, there exists a breach of trust between the studio and me, the consumer.
Page 2 of 4 First 2 3 > Last



Jump To: