First of all, sorry if this message is a little long, but I want to get my point accross.
I know you monitor the boards regularly and respect the input of your fan base so I wanted to bring a request to your attention...
I find myself purchasing more and more of your titles, and less of many other studies (such as anabolic/diabolic, i feel their quality of movies on many different levels, which I wont get into, has been depreciating over the years). I do however, have one complaint regarding the majority of Redlights releases, particulary the Throat Gagger series. But this subject may be addressed to all series.
Why is it, that almost ALL scenes that end with fellatio, must end with a cumshot to the face? Why is it we never see an internal cumshot during a concluding fellatio scene? Do we really need/want to see every scene end with a guy stroking himself off into someones awaiting mouth or face?
Why do you think the Gag Factor series won AVN ? I'll tell you why, they won because they have no frig'n competition when it comes to aggressive oral and INTERNAL ORAL CUMSHOTS.
I own several of the Gag Factor DVD's, and while I think Gag Factor #1 was a masterpiece, the majority of the following releases were less then garbage (just my personal opinion). Ugly women, poor studio set ups, and the same generic 'hang your head over the couch' position. But, they're providing something that no other studio is...
I think 90% of porn viewers want to see a nice load shot across the face or in the mouth. Anal cream pies are all right but nothing to rwrite home about for the average person.
DreamWeaver, first off, thanks for the kind words about Red light district, I have no problem with you buying more red Light district than other companies, I'm gratiful for that, as far as ThroatGaggers goes, I got a new Director doing it, it is very aggressive, and I hope you like it, when it gets done, I will send you a free copy and you could post your review on the best porn message board in the world "AdultDvdtalk, and you can post your review, before these guys spend there hard money on this video, the director is jake malone, he is a sick Fuck, as far as Erik everhard and mike john, those boys can put a pretty romantic show together,let it be known, that No Cum dodgeing Allowed has sold over 15000 copies between Vhs and dvd, Mike John is pretty happy owning his own stuff,Mike is probably surfing rightnow counting his money,do the math mike, 15000 times, you know what the wholesale price is, don't forget my percentage,you might be living next to vince real soon.
Congrats to Mike John & Red Light for the overall success of "No Cum Dodging Allowed"! It's number 1 in sales/rentals in the local shops & many places online.
Even if Mike say got $5, that's $75,000 for one movie. No wonder owning your own product is so desired in the biz.
[Link]
Porn Scout Deactivated User
3735 Posts 10/02
Posted - Aug 11 2003 : 9:04PM
I echo this sentiment. I'm getting used to the anal creampie, but it's still kind of a letdown. Swallowing is number one in my book and facial is naturally second. Although parlor tricks such as the anal creampie to cocktail glass to mouth to gullett are pretty cool, for the most part anal creampies are just kind of there, and I do not like vag creampies one bit. These are just my assorted opinions of course. Everybody has their thing and these days there's plenty of porn out there to pretty much satisfy everyone's tastes and generally, I think RLD does a good job addressing the tastes of a broad spectrum of the porn fanbase.
Dion - I've given it some serious thought, and I've decided I'll have to take you up on that offer of a free copy of the next ThroatGaggers. ;) I'll let the board know with a review if your new director has what it takes to make us happy.
Porn Scout posted - "Everybody has their thing and these days there's plenty of porn out there to pretty much satisfy everyone's tastes and generally, I think RLD does a good job addressing the tastes of a broad spectrum of the porn fanbase."
I'd have to agree, RLD is NEARLY providing what everyone wants. If you want euro girls, they got it. Want teens? they got it. Anal, DP, DAP, They got it all. Want to see a vag/anal cream pie? They got it. Want the ladies in lingerie? They even have that too! You get the point. .......But, where is the AGGRESSIVE ORAL with INTERNAL ORAL CUMSHOTS? We're still waiting.
My only worry here is the" done to death " syndrome. There is a huge glut of similiar lines with many emerging companies and most are not horrible. 2 Guys with 1 Chick. WOW....never thought of that before.What now having a dick makes you a retard when it comes to naming your series. I realize we do not want to confuse the customer but for many new customers they all sound the same. It may take them awhile before they figure out which ones are the best because they all sound alike. Young Chicks Who Drink Dicks....wow that one even rhymes. We all know the box cover is the primary reason for the sale/rental of the item, but at least give em a title to remember that separates the shit from the wanna-be's. Okay one more sick idea for a scene and or series. Get two bums to fight over who gets the crack whore. Let's see some non-viagra hardons in that one. The crowd would be rooting them on and afterwards cheer on the winner who sips his 40oz as he doggie fucks.....the spoils.
Ramsey they use the freshest faces in the Jizz Biz! A lot of the new girls they capture first at RLD.
And a strong cast of male talent like your all-time favorite Erik Everhard
I do admit they shouldn't use guys like Mr. Pete, Tony Teschedi, Joel Lawrence, & Pat Myne too often if never again.
I don't mind them using Mark Davis (your other favorite), Lee Stone, Brian Pumper, Steve Holmes, Brandon Iron, Manuel Ferrara, Dick Delaware, Mike Stefano, Lex, Franco, & other guys!
IAFD, supporters of beastiality. Just say no. 7564 Posts 11/02
Posted - Aug 13 2003 : 1:16PM
I have no idea whatsoever what this means or why you included a non-related quote the way you did (you sure don't know your way around here, do you?).
So let me explain MYSELF to you.
I have been watching porn for over 15 years now. In those 15 years I have seen, oh, ballpark figure, 10,000 porn titles. You could say that I am a well-informed consumer. Well, this well-informed consumer finds the porn he wants to see without hardly paying any attention AT ALL to box covers. In fact, I have learned, thanks to trial and error, the system I still use today to pick my porn, that box covers are about the least reliable things to look for. Now let's look at your claim that I am retail challenged. What does this mean? Sure I understand that from a business perspective, box covers are really valuable tools to sell/fool your audience/customers. But leave the collective "WE" out of your accessment of the way I choose my porn. Of course, I am retail challenged. If I don't like some shit, I tell my retailer and challenge him. And if I want some shit, I tell it too him as well, if he doesn't have it. And if he doesn't have it, I can hardly look at a box cover, can I.
About the non-related quote, here is another one. (And it is a good one. In fact, it is #30 for GaySatyr, so head over to the Polls forum and participate in a fun little game.)
GaySatyr said: "He who adorns himself with tattoos to accent his beauty defeats his purpose - the result is a distraction; he whose body art is intended as a distraction succeeds - he is lost in the background of his canvas."
I think porn-newbies are the ones who always go for the nice boxcover because they're impressed by it but I'm old school and I know you should never judge a pornmovie by it's cover.
IAFD, supporters of beastiality. Just say no. 7564 Posts 11/02
Posted - Aug 14 2003 : 11:45AM
Besides the fact that I am probably a sure thing (if I visit a store, I am going to rent something), I don't think I am the perfect customer at all. Because, well, when you wrote this:I generally have the opposite experience: I can tell the clerks what is good or bad, for me at least. IOW, I generally give the clerks a hard time ("Where is the latest ... title? What, you have never heard of ...? And how come you don't carry ...? And why do you carry both a German and an original American version of this title? ...). Unless of course, the clerk happens to be "Patricia Diamond". She has seen me naked.
I am sorry. I realize you are new to this board and don't know the particulars. Stick around and you will. It is just that, well, I tend to be EXTREMELY critical of any kind of recommendations.
No, no. No apology needed. In fact, let me apologize to you. I believe you completely when you say that it was not your intent. I, on the other hand, was rude and drew some conclusions way too soon (such as the quotes thing, which was obviously an honest mistake). I blame it on the heat wave here, which is luckily over. So welcome to ADT. And forgive/forget the bad first impression I gave you.
Sir Noel Plum said: "An American mocking your cooking is a bit like a Brazilian telling you how to manage your national debt."
Petite Hottie Has A Tight Grip - review by Danielmayu33216
Posted - Aug 11 2003 : 12:45AM