more performer info on...

Image of Mike John

Mike John

Participate...

log in
register

Browse...

Etiquette
Active Topics
Popular Topics
Member List
Search

All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 358 > Mike John's Raw. Er, Totally Unprofessional

Author	Post
DarkPlaces Member 477 Posts 3/07	Posted - Aug 5 2010 : 1:37AM In tradition of Mauel Ferrara's Raw (or honestly, Ed Powers and Pierre Woodman, but much, much, much less skeevy) Mike John joins the fray of simply fucking the girls alone in a room with the camera on the side, no longer even pretending it's about creating a fantasy for the viewer but letting the director get him some. Well, at least it'll be well shot because the reason Mike John is king of POV is because he never puts pleasing his dick before getting a good shot (Chris Streams please note this). And almost no one has better chemistry with Rayveness than, of all people, Mike John. That makes this almost an instant buy alone. [Link]
buckaroo Member 283 Posts 10/08	Posted - Aug 14 2010 : 5:00PM Ah, let him have his fun. Guy's a good shooter no matter what [Link]
mike john Mike John Productions 389 Posts 8/02	Posted - Aug 14 2010 : 5:17PM This movie is all about chemistry,an attempt to show you pros letting go and really being themselves.I have been including this type of footage in my POV movies bts for years,people liked it so....Katie st Ives and I went to mammoth for her first trip to the snow,just seeing her all excited catching snowflakes on her tounge and flashing her boobs is enough to get me stroking.Each girl was chosen because of chemistry I think it shows a side of the girls rarley seen.I used multiple cameras and included tons of POV,it was much more complicated to shoot than a regular POV.The trailer is up over at the jules jordan website,it gives a good example of what to expect.thanks for watching Edited by - mike john on 8/14/2010 5:25:19 PM Edited by - mike john on 8/14/2010 10:13:15 PM [Link]
realtip Deactivated User 2301 Posts 6/04	Posted - Aug 14 2010 : 9:39PM DarkPlaces wrote: In tradition of Mauel Ferrara's Raw (or honestly, Ed Powers and Pierre Woodman, but much, much, much less skeevy) Mike John joins the fray of simply fucking the girls alone in a room with the camera on the side, no longer even pretending it's about creating a fantasy for the viewer but letting the director get him some. Click to expand Without having watched the trailer yet or knowing anything about it, I don't know whether or not I'll be checking out this particular flick. But I do know that I like these kinds of movies, and prefer this type of "POV" over the other type where the guy holds the camera the entire time. Hopefully, this type of "POV" will come to replace the other type that I find to be mostly boring and unintersting. [Link]
Algaliarept Senior Member 3557 Posts 7/08	Posted - Aug 14 2010 : 10:22PM Blossom wrote: I've watched some of his videos & I have to say I love POV & HE does a good job. :P Click to expand I couldn't agree more! I've bought other POV (Mike Adriano, John Strong, Erik Everhard, etc) and the POV shot by Mike John is the best of all IMHO, I'm not sure I can really say why, it just has that "certain something" the Umami of porn. [Link]

ntfighter Member 645 Posts 7/07	Posted - Aug 14 2010 : 10:23PM I'm looking forward to seeing it. It sounds to be just the kind of porn I've been hoping for. "pros letting go and really being themselves" Thank you Mike John for innovating and stepping outside the norm. Edited by - ntfighter on 8/14/2010 10:25:11 PM [Link]
buckaroo Member 283 Posts 10/08	Posted - Aug 15 2010 : 1:24AM [Link]
DarkPlaces Member 477 Posts 3/07	Posted - Sep 17 2010 : 1:41AM I finally saw this and while I am a clear Mike Johns fan, I found this a little disappointing, with the exception of---you guessed it---the Rayveness scene. The movie could almost be a cautionary tale as to why you cannot fuck porn stars and why guys like Mark Ashley are needed, as it is essentially Mike holding for dear life in almost every scene. I think Mike needs the burden of the camera to distract him, because without it these girls clearly are not to be trifled with. There are three pop shots in the Katie St. Ives scene alone and he's worked with her a number of times. Sara Stone looked like she was going to give him a stroke simply because she thought it was funny, while Baby Cakes just seemed disinterested (Mike if you have a weak spot in casting it's for large breasted sistas. I don't think you've had a hot one since Sierra all those years ago). Luckily, Rachel Love comes almost instantly so him having to stop constantly to control himself isn't a problem (and yes, watching her come repeatedly is hot). Of course the Rayveness scene rules because, aside from their chemistry (which they actually discuss while fucking) she involves the camera. It's as if it's a threesome and the camera is the third member. At one point she even takes it to film herself being fucked. It made this movie for me and normally I hate girls playing to the camera, but it was clearly getting her off, so it made the scene work. I've give it a Three out of Five, but next time I'm renting first (whereas I'm buying POV Perver 12 tomorrow outright)...unless he's a bastard and puts Rayveness in every one of these, which would just be cruel to my wallet. Edited by - DarkPlaces on 9/17/2010 1:43:46 AM [Link]

All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 358Mike John's Raw. Er, Totally Unprofessional

Previous topic: This Girl Reminds Me Of Amia Miley
Next topic: Okay, Mike John. This Is Your All-Rayveness Movie.

Link to this post

Use the code below to link to this topic or a specific post.

URL of this thread

Link to this post with HTML

Link to this post with Forum Code