Is it just me who feels that the makers of some of these porn parodies can do so much better with their scenes? Some of the movies feel almost exactly like the original that there's no fantasy involved, for example in both Seinfeld 1 and 2, the character of George doesn't get to have sex with anybody, sure this fits in with his loser character from the original sitcom, but surely the makers could have added a scene for his character purely in the name of fantasy, at least he'll have someone to fuck, I know I like scenes where unattractive/older guys get to fuck attractive women.
This isn't across the board however, in the Halloween parody (the Lily Labeau one), Laurie fucks Michael (****SPOILERS-technically revealed to be her brother in Halloween II****END SPOILERS), sure this is a Luke/Leia situation from Star Wars XXX where they're just messing around, but it's something that's interesting and/or appealing to fans of the movies being parodied.
Yet in parodies such as the one for The Silence of the Lambs, Clarice and Hannibal don't have a scene together, or Dorothy and the Tin Man or Scarecrow in Not The Wizard of Oz, surely these are missed opportunities, or is there some contractual rights law thingy that the makers can't breach when deciding which characters to pair together?
Does anyone else have an opinion on this?
Sorry if this has been posted in the wrong section, first post :)
Topic Moved by - killbillvol69 on Apr 5 2015