Molly Stewart

and to answer the questions:
@hawki , i dont know, the guy that posted them on a private discord im in didnt said how much but he didnt post the vids, only those screen caps, i guess it was the 400$ vid she was giving or else he would have shared it whole
he did said though it was not worth the money cause it was very disappointing, that camera angle is all there is in the vid and you see no penetration at all, they dont change position at any point and she looked like she was stoned and was a boring fuck

@nastybiker , these are two separate vids

[Link]

With that much you can have access to 1 million professional movies or an escort girl.

MOD:
Treat fellow posters as neighbors. Please be respectful of each other and each other's threads.

Edited by - flash on 11/8/2020 12:24:28 PM

[Link]

interesting that she seems stoned - that won't help her if she's scamming fans with poor quality "exclusives" that she's not even interested in properly participating in

Edited by - flash on 12/21/2020 10:56:12 AM

[Link]

The caps were she is fucked from behind are from the softcore bg video that she released a few weeks ago for 100$

The full hardcore bg video is 2 parts of both 15 minutes. Each part is 100$, so 200$ in total. In that vid you see her giving that bj and see her getting fucked in multiple positions.

Edited by - Street13 on 11/7/2020 1:13:03 PM

Edited by - Street13 on 11/7/2020 1:13:54 PM

Edited by - Street13 on 11/7/2020 1:14:19 PM

[Link]

From your criticism of the content, Molly would need to have promised studio-level production values for your money and deliberately chosen not to meet that promise with a low quality video for a scam to have taken place. A scam requires wilful misrepresentation so unless you can establish that beyond your attempt to appeal to emotion, there is no "fact" to change.

Would you care to explain why non-custom content cannot be charged at $400? An individual or a studio can charge what they like, custom content or not, but whether they get paying customers is another matter.

Edited by - AngryPirate on 11/8/2020 6:36:56 AM

[Link]

Edited by - Flash on 11/18/2020 9:07:32 AM

[Link]

For Brazzers HotandMean Series

Starring: Molly Stewart, Lacy Lennon

Title: No Turkey, Just Ham

Already released on: 11/25/2020

Here the Link to the Scene.
Brazzers HotandMean - Molly Stewart, Lacy Lennon

[Link]

on the B/G front, unlike fellow cocktease, at least Molly delivered some actual B/G penetrative sex on camera, something Darcie has failed to do since day one! so she gets some credit for actually delivering, despite failing to deliver a quality scene to live up to fans expectations

[Link]

Did you see the quality of her own previous productions (Step Sisters etc)? It was top notch stuff. Now maybe I'm misremembering but then didn't she ask her fans to pay for her "first BG" production costs if she was to shoot one with the quality she did before by setting up a crowdfunder for it with a goal of tens of thousands of dollars - which was fully reached? Didn't the people who funded her still have to buy the video separately? Didn't she initially cut up the video into tiny pieces and sell them each for hundreds of dollars? And then does the whole thing look like a production that cost over twenty thousand dollars or rather some crappy camshow recording she had laying about from her early days?

IMO there are 2 reasons fans have to be upset:
- the business practices
- completely botching a first BG by a GG performer who had teased and denied her fans so exquisitely for more than a year. A crime against porn!

Edited by - hoochimama on 7/26/2021 1:13:16 PM

[Link]

Edited by - Hugo Bass on 7/31/2021 8:57:46 AM

[Link]

Edited by - hoochimama on 9/20/2021 1:36:09 PM

[Link]

[Tweet is no longer available]

[Link]