Featured New Release
Box cover for Livestream Wet Dream 2
Livestream Wet Dream 2
Studio: PornFidelity
Release date: 7/28/2026


all new releases
All Forums > The Feature Side > The Feature Side Forum Page 57 > Money shots, internal or not?
AuthorPost
pil008
Member

138 Posts
12/04
Posted - Apr 8 2005 : 3:59PM
Hi,

I understand the reason for the money shot in porn features, it plays a handy role of giving the scene its "climax"; but are there times when you're watching a scene that's so hot -- and there seems such a powerful connection between the two performers -- that the money shot seems wrong, if not downright insulting?

Personally I can think of only a few such incidences, but as it would take hours to go through my porn collection and find the names, I'll only mention the most recent I've seen.

The scene between Nick Manning and Olivia Del Rio in "Angel X".

The scene between Asia Carrera and Jonathan Morgan in "A is for Asia".

The "black and white" scene in Zazel. I don't know the actors' names.

I'm surprised that there are not more.

Phil

vodka tonic
coolest cucumber

who
1243 Posts
11/02
Posted - Apr 8 2005 : 5:13PM
I've gotten so accustomed to money shots through the years that I plead guilty of being frustrated when there's none. "Pink Prison" had very few money shots for example. I need this visual sense of closure. But you're right, it shouldn't be necessary. It doesn't hinder my enjoyment of a scene, but, y'know....I love cum
Juster
Member

67 Posts
3/03
Posted - Apr 9 2005 : 10:45AM
I dunno about insulting, but sometimes there's no legitimate point to 'em (money shots). I think where it really gets out of hand is when the guy pulls out, puts a strangle hold on his dick and staggers up to the woman's head so he can pop on her face. But then again, I don't see the need for facials at all.
Cuddly Wombat
Senior Member

Just another bare bum in the shiower
1739 Posts
12/04
Posted - Apr 9 2005 : 12:01PM
I need a cum shot purely for my own psychological satisfaction of the scene - that is, so that I know that the guy was really turned on by the girl and she took him all the way. If he doesn't visibly cum, I figure he couldn't get excited and I just mentally picture a guy losing wood on a porn set, and so I too lose my own excitement.

I don't need the cum shot to be external though. A good internal cum shot that leaks out naturally can be very hot and consistent with the storyline of some of the softer, more romantic, feature films.

Dover
Member

24 Posts
1/05
Posted - Apr 9 2005 : 8:28PM
I like to be suprised, internal, external, it doesn't matter to me :)
 
astroknight All-Star Supporter
Questionable Moderator

Tastes so good...
4187 Posts
11/99
Posted - Apr 10 2005 : 11:26AM
I feel robbed if I don't see the pop, and if I don't see one I figure that the guy couldn't perform completely. It doesn't have to be a facial, but it shouldn't avoid the face either. This subject has come up several times, and I have to go with what I think Stagliano said about pop shots. If not an internal pop (which I think should be used a bit in couples movies because it is a natural ending for so many couples) it should go to the girl's most beautiful feature. If she has a great rack, it goes on the tits, if a killer ass, it goes on the ass, if she's got the most beautiful face around, it should be a facial. That leaves you focusing on the girl's best feature as the scene ends. More importantly than where it goes, though, is how it goes. Guys standing around pulling their pud is a much bigger problem than the overabundance of facials.

"Vegetarianism for me is about saying ‘yes’ to things - even meat." - Coupling

Endless Loop
Senior Member

Tomatometer
1129 Posts
8/04
Posted - Apr 15 2005 : 5:48AM



Jump To: