I don't get that concept. In many new movies the girls start out really rough, fucking eachother/them selves with monster dildos that are like 14 inch long and thick as a beer can, then after 20 minutes a guy comes in to fuck her/them in the ass. For normal anal scenes the girl's have to prep to be able to do anal, but how can fisting/monster dildos be considered prepping for anal sex with a 9 inch cock? :P fucking should be considered prepping for the toys. It's probably not so pleasurable for the guys either to fuck a sloppy stretched (and sometime rosebudded) ass, the girls probably don't feel much either. To me the whole concept of anal is that the ass should be really tight tighter than the pussy, I think the guys are useless in such scenes, rather see the producers omit them, to they just take away from the scene. Another more serious aspect is the std risk, after extreme penetration there are sores that guarantuely will cause the girls to get any std that the guy might have (not that it's common, but there are accidents)
I totally agree! It should start small with the guy working his cock in the girl then maybe toys and fisting... Just makes sense and it much easier on my body.
EverythingButt's been like this damn near all the time, ever since they stopped doing solo and g/g scenes and started shoehorning a man into every scene. I've seen it in some Jay Sin DVDs, too.
I had everything butt in mind when I asked the question because that is the only place where I have seen that type of content. All the other sites tend to be G/G only. I think the reason why Kink went the G/G large toys and fisting first was because part of their members wanted the content to be G/G only while others wanted some B/G added to it. By having all the extreme G/G stuff in the beginning then you satisfy your G/G only crowd and by having the boy later on than you satisfy your other members. I suspect Kink took a midle of the road approach and that's why the G/G stuff is at the beginning and then it switches to B/G/G. You will notice that once the boy comes into play then it is usually standard B/G stuff with anal of course. There is rarely any fisting once the male is added.
Hopefully my above post will explain why Kink does it the way they do it. I agree that starting small is better for the performer but then again they could always shoot the B/G/G content before they shoot the more intense G/G only. It's not like they don't stop the camera to go from G/G to B/G/G anyway.
I can't remember where I saw it, but I saw a scene with Alysa (she of the monster gapes, double fists in the her ass, etc. etc.). She prepped with some of the largest material I've ever seen entire a woman's rectum. Then the dude--who had a pretty substantial Johnson--started fucking her ass. And literally when he positioned himself correctly, he was fucking air. Her rectum was so stretched out that he fully inside her, yet not touching her pretty much in any way. Wasn't particularly hot, but it made up for it with the sheer "Holy Shit"ness of it all...
You all are assuming that no prep has been made way before the scene , I remember Clayra Beau in another thread about anal sex that she begun to prepare days before with toys and buttplugs taken in for hours to be sure her ass is already loose enough to not get hurt during the scene. I would assume that any actress with even just a couple of neurons wouldn't go to extrteme anal without proper foretreatment Edited by - Laurie Cameron Fan on 4/22/2012 11:00:04 AM
IF you're the fucker yes but it's meant for the viewer , someone buying a DVD for the monster dildos , someone getting excited by seeing a girl incredibly stretched out and jerking off while watching , then a guy representing the viewer in his fantasy comes in and fuck the girl as the viewer would like to, then he cums and maybe the viewer too. Does this make sense?
I prefer to be a "fly on the wall" voyeur/watcher while the girls are enjoying themselves in all manner of G/G depravity and having G/G fun without any guy around to cause distraction or interference. If a viewer absolutely requires to see an onscreen penis spurting cum in order to cum IRL, then that viewer needs to be watching B/G porn and not G/G porn. Otherwise, by your logic, every porn scene should have a B/G cumshot tacked onto the end to appease all those viewers who require seeing a guy spurting cum onto a girl's face. Gay sex scene would have a girl walk in at the end and have a dude jerk off onto her face. Solo guy scene would have a girl walk in at the end and have the dude jerk off onto her face. Solo girl scene would have a guy walk in at the end and jerk off onto her face. Does this make sense?
^As explanations go, it's the one that makes some (small amount of) logical sense. I'd be curious to know if anyone actually likes/prefers seeing a guy inserted into an otherwise purely G/G scene, or are most viewers merely tolerating it because of few alternatives. Edited by - ninja1 on 4/23/2012 11:37:14 AM
Posted - Apr 19 2012 : 11:13AM