I mean movies that feature: - natural light - camera shows the "action" in general or just fixed manually somewhere + occasional POV elements - Girls working up a sweat from fucking + visible (!) perspiration and other natural things - unlike most of american porn - uncut cocks also count Please share your suggestions!
[Link]
AsianAnalPantyhoserGuy Deactivated User
Ass fucking/ foot fetish/ pantyhose= insanity! 465 Posts 3/10
Posted - Nov 2 2010 : 8:32PM
First of all, let me say that Manuel Ferrara is a very handsome man. It is believable, that in his handsomeness, women would be severely aroused by him. He also seems like a very cool guy. My personal opinion of his performances....watching his uncut cock, barely go in and out of a woman's holes, is like watching paint dry. Sure, he's looking intense. Sure, his balls are flying all over the place, but his tool is not getting the old "in/out-in/out" like an American performer with a big circumcised cock would. As far as natural light goes...fuck that. Russian websites like teencoreclub.com are 10 times better at lighting their women. Check out assteenmouth.com, girlsgotcream.com, tryteens.com, maketeengape.com, and whiteteensblackcock.com. When it comes to lighting, you'll see how Russians are beating the living shit out of "American made" porn.
Honestly? I don't think there is anything like RAW done by anyone else. OK, wait, Ed Powers. I don't know if you've seen any of his 500+ Dirty Debutante vids, but they are similar in that he just set up the camera in his living room and went at it. However, Ed is not quite the porn stud Manuel is, did not have a very big wang, and honestly, once the series got up in the 100s, it became more or less, Factory Porn, where Ed was just punching the clock; Getting 'em in and gettin' em out.
I just recently watched Raw #6. I have to say that this series is definitely one of the best series in porn right now. It is the only good series where the sex actually looks like real sex instead of porn sex. No ridiculous acrobatics, no posturing for the camera, no handheld POV the whole time (having it for part of the scene is OK, but having it the whole entire scene is just annoying). Instead, he just sits the camera down on a tripod and films himself and a girl doing some straight fucking. Not sure why Manuel is the only person in porn to catch onto this idea. But I like it.
I agree. I think the reason more Raw-type movies aren't done is because few stars other than Manuel, Rocco, James Deen, Everhard, Stefano (maybe others) really connect with the girls in the scene beyond position 1 switch to position 2 and so on. The first objective of any porn guy/director is to make the girl feel special and get her off, all the rest will fall into place if that happens. Some guys don't even look at the girl but Manuel almost commands the girl to look at him. I've seen some of Manuel's early work with girls that started the scene shy, uninterested, but by the end they were totally different. I don't think that's acting its just how the guy is and that's why Manuel is #1. It's a cliche, but its all psychological with women.
