No need to promote unsafe sex. But its a movie too....I wouldn't go blow a bunch of people away after seeing a violent film......
Mixed feelings......
[Link]
Equilibrium Ep 1 - review by fu_q| Author | Post |
|---|---|
| Billy Bathgate Member  Choooooooch! 507 Posts 7/02 |  Posted - Mar 3 2004 : 10:54AMJB-- A really good interview with Billy Wild. I had just watched Billy Cums Home from Raging Stallion (which I did like a lot) prior to reading your review. Obviously, there's a fair amount of controversy about oral cum shots and barebacking but there seems to be a new line being drawn between these two activities with oral shots becoming more acceptable but barebacking still shunned by mainstream and viewed as sort of an outlaw activity. As you have pointed out, RS has featured oral shots in their flicks for a while, but they seem to be doing and/or hyping it more, as evidenced by this from an ad sent to me: Pokin' in the Boys Room will be the most trend setting of them all! For the first time in almost twenty years a major movie from a major studio is being released with full-on, tongue coating, throat soothing, over the top, good and tasty oral cum shots. That's right guys, load after load is shot directly into the open, waiting mouths of Raging Stallion's eager bottoms. Other studios have filmed furtive oral cum shots--putting them in special features and the like--but no one since the 1980s has made swallowing a load of white hot cum the focus of a high budget, superstar-studded, top-of-the-line production. I do wonder if this is the start of a new, perhaps unwelcome trend that will eventually result in mainstream studios embracing bareback. Personally, I don’t find the oral shots especially extra hot, beyond what some really steamy sex scene does for me, but I know many guys do. Obviously RS feels this is a trend they can market to. Thoughts? Billy [Link] |
| netguy Member 687 Posts 12/99 | Posted - Mar 3 2004 : 1:57PM No need to promote unsafe sex. But its a movie too....I wouldn't go blow a bunch of people away after seeing a violent film...... Mixed feelings...... [Link] |
| joeblow69 Member 946 Posts 2/00 | Posted - Mar 3 2004 : 6:33PM Thanks for the compliments! I think you may be confusing Raging Stallion with the San Francisco Fetish Factory. Billy Cums Home is a SFFF movie, not a RS one. SFFF is the company that's being doing oral cumshots for a while now. As far as I know, RS hasn't had any oral cumshots yet. I know it's not very PC, but I love oral cumshots, and yes, I will probably buy Pokin' in the Boys Room as soon as it comes out, specifically to see what all the fuss is about. Edited by - joeblow69 on 3/3/2004 10:18:56 PM [Link] |
| Billy Bathgate Member Choooooooch! 507 Posts 7/02 | Posted - Mar 3 2004 : 9:33PM Yeah, you're right; I confused RS with FF formerly SFFF. But that makes the point. Here's a major studio now getting into the oral cumshot action big time. Billy [Link] |
| joeblow69 Member 946 Posts 2/00 | Posted - Mar 20 2004 : 12:43PM Well, I just got Pokin in the Boys Room yesterday, so I can finally give my initial impresssions: Honestly, I just zipped through the movie to check out the oral cumshots. What I saw of the rest of the movie (fucking and sucking) looked fine. If you buy this strictly for the oral cumshots, you may be a little dissapointed. Sure, there is a number of them, but some of them don't seem to be shot from the best angle. There weren't any real monster loads landing on someone's tongue either. My biggest beef is that there were a number of missed opportunites. Take the final scene for example. Hunky cover-boy Tag Adams is kneeling down with three guys jacking off around him. Two guys blow their loads on his shoulder and only one guy (Micheal Brandon) sprays into Tag's mouth. Seems to me if you are going to make an oral cumshot movie, you should make every pop count! [Link] |
| Use the code below to link to this topic or a specific post. |
| URL of this thread |
| Link to this post with HTML |
| Link to this post with Forum Code |