Ok, so maybe the responsible thing would be to wait until morning to evaluate whether or not to mindlessly rant but then again, I've been known to down a couple of Bloody Marys before 10am on occasion (Bloody Ceasars actually, for any Canadians who might be reading this) so there's really no specific time when I might be free of booze. That being said.....
I'm sure other directors can relate to the following scenario...
Girl begins scene and almost right away it is apparent that there is absolutely no rythym and no chemistry. She doesn't look like her pictures and she appears to be counting the moments until she can leave. The scene progresses and you're thinking to yourself "This f*&king sucks!! I can't possibly put this scene in a movie" while at the same time you're hoping that some spark happens and the scene suddenly becomes watchable. Half way through the scene you're finally forced to make a decision to put a halt to this erotic farce. But then, how do you do it? Do you come right out and say "Honey, you're a big, fat pig and you've exhibited nothing resembling a pulse. You should never be without clothing" or do you do what I ended up doing: lie and then pay the girl $400 to put her clothes back on and go home.
Somehow without looking like a complete asshole I would like to issue a press release that states... if I hire you for a scene and you completely suck, I'm not paying you a "kill" fee. I'm simply going to hand you the tape and thank you for your time. In the past week I have paid 3 different girls to go home. I'm tired of it. I pay your rate. I don't nickel and dime you and I have you in and out within 3 hours. Can't you return the favor? Don't tell me that you're "sore" from a previous scene. I am paying you the same exhorbitant rate as the guy that shot you before me and I deserve the same performance. As a matter of fact, don't give me any fucking excuses. If you don't feel like working, be honest and tell me up front. I will happilly reschedule and I will hold you in much higher regard for being honest. And guys, don't blame your sub-par performance on anything other than yourself. Everyone has a bad day. Your ego will survive. Just cop to it and I will happily book you again and write off your flacid performance to bad luck.
The bottom line is that I'm tired of spending my boss's money on bullshit. We are one of those companies who NEVER try to bargain on rates. We pay what you ask. In return we expect our money's worth. I shot Jenna Haze this morning and paid her a small fortune. Do you know what I got in return? A mindblowing performance. She was involved every step of the way. "Do you need more of this? Is this okay? Does this look good?" All new girls should look to her to see what they should aspire to. If you don't like sex, don't get into porn. We all know you're in it for the money (we all are) but you should try your best to make it seem like money is the last thing on your mind. If you want to phone in a scene, give me a discount so that I can put the scene in a comp or tell me ahead of time that you hate sex, males, and porn so that I may make an educated decision to send you packing.
So I guess my rant is really directed at the "kill fee" aspect of the pornographic production processs. If you suck, it's not my fault. Don't expect money for your half-assed effort.
I'm too inebriated to contine typing. Hopefully I made a point of some kind.
What you should do is give performers this rant before you negotiate for their services.
I'm sure you have enough credibility with the talent agents that they'll know you aren't just trying to stiff the performers. Unfortunately, I'm not sure that no other shooter would try stiffing them, so taking away the kill fee is probably a bad idea.
I would have thought that the many had not been through the grind of a 9-5 and thus had a lot of exposure to professionalism.
[Link]
pinc_noiz Deactivated User
758 Posts 6/05
Posted - Aug 18 2006 : 5:18AM
Why ? You didn't hurt anyone, and it's your honest feeling ...
p_n
[Link]
Ejac Deactivated User
851 Posts 9/04
Posted - Aug 18 2006 : 8:10AM
Reading this reminds me of how fortunate I am to be able to have free unhibited sex without pressure (I'd never make a good porn stud), and still be able to pick something up off of the shelf at a whim.
Tough racket (like a lot of others), but I'm thankful that it exists.
I have an idea for you guys. Hire older porn girls. when is the last time you guys tried to hire a woman like nicole sheridan or Lisa Ann? these women seem to love their work.
Nothing says I love you so much as a tongue in the ass. 2884 Posts 1/03
Posted - Aug 18 2006 : 9:58AM
I feel your pain Quaze. I know it must be tempting to just post something on pornstarperformance.com and trash the girl, but I don't think that would be very productive or classy. I do think you need to make your feelings known to the agents repping these girls, letting them know you don't feel like you're getting what's advertised, nor appreciate getting the back end of a double booking. Maybe it'll get you a rebate, future consideration for the hottest starlets, or just better disclosure from the agency. It also might get the agent to put his client on notice without a public embarrassment. Everybody wants to make as much money as fast as possible. Sometimes they need to slow things down to maintain some semblance of quality.
How about a new line, "Out-takes: Scenes from the Cutting-Room Floor"?
"Think it only happens to you? See professional porn stars having a very bad-hair day. Trust us, these scenes are real, and the performers were actually paid."
At least make a blooper-reel for the parties at AVN Las Vegas
You call that a drunken rant, Quaze? Not once in your drunken diatribe did you blame the jews for this problem and all other problems in the world, nor did you refer to Steph as 'Sugar Tits' or claim to 'own Malibu'.
Frankly, I'm disappointed....must try harder next time!!!
Didn't you say in a post last year you yourself are making six figures? Isn't ZT making money hand over first? Even if you had two a week, that's only like $100K tops. Like paying outstanding talent higher rates, isn't the cost of flakage, etc already factored in? All in the game, yo.
C'mon Tony. I don't recall ever making any attempt to boast about how much money I personally may or may not make and as far as the company goes, our annual revenue is irrelevant. I'm sure Bill Gates doesn't like to waste money any more than a homeless guy living on a freeway offramp. Wasted money is wasted money.
In the fog of the morning light my rant doesn't seem as offensive as I feared it might have been.
But I agree, I should have thrown in something about the jews :)
The one scene I shot for Quaze has been one of my most consistantly well-reviewed scenes. I think he's a fine director - if he can't get what he wants out of the talent, it's definitely the talent's fault.
That being said, I wonder if there is a tactful way for talent to say, "I can't get into this scene, this guy is abusive, repulsive, and I think he's stoned. I would love to work for you, but not here, not now. I showed up with every intention of doing my best for you, and I can't." without being blackballed, without being granted diva status, without being dropped to the bottom of the do-not-call list. Yes, talent is supposed to be professional and overcome personal feelings during a shoot, but it just isn't always possible to overcome when the talent you're supposed to be working with is working against you.
Kimi, if a girl ever said that to me I would be overjoyed and she would be at the top of my list for a future shoot. Telling a director up front that you don't feel well, you don't like the guy, you're having an allergic reaction to paxil and ecstasy, whatever, gives the director the option of rescheduling and not wasting anyone's time or money that day.
I gotta say that I'm a little disappointed that a drunken Chico Wang hasn't put in his 2 cents.
You're right Tony. I'm an arrogant bastard rolling around in piles of money.
I believe I used the term "6 figure income" to illustrate that a high school dropout with a bad liver can do well in porn, not to brag about the six figure income.
This is all I've heard and seen since her return to b/g. I never thought that after her JKP veggie days that I'd be saying this about her, but like Quaze mentioned, she's one girl a lot of current performers could stand to look up to.
Re: Kill Fees
It's a concept I never quite understood. Let me rephrase that: if talent shows up to my set and I have to send them home for some reason of MINE, then yes, I understand paying them a small fee to compensate them for their time. They showed up ready to work, expected to be working and because of some of my own, they weren't able to. Fine. Here's some money, sorry for wasting your time.
On the other hand, if the reason the scene doesn't go down is because of the performer, why should *I* pay YOU? Be it because you show up looking like crap, don't really feel like working, aren't vibing with your partner, etc. if it's on you, then I'm not paying you in addition to that. There are girls working right now who know they look nothing like the pictures their agent floats around anymore, yet they'll still show up to set after set, collecting kill fee after kill fee with no intention of actually earning their wage. Why should a girl be allowed to get sent home from three or four sets in a row ON SIGHT and STILL get paid just for showing up even if the problem is clearly HER and ONLY HER?
I understand Mike's frustration. You almost feel as though you're the one being ripped off and taken advantage of.
You're probably hungover now, but here's a suggestion. Hire veteran talent exclusively. No newbies allowed. And pair partners that have worked together and shown chemistry in the past. That'll improve your odds.
Prior to every scene you shoot just spell out to each performer what you expect and that if they don't live up to your expectations they aren't going to get shit (maybe make them sign a waiver if you have to).
One of two things will happen.
1) They will agree and do the best they can to live up to your standards.
2) They tell you to fuck off and you're too picky.
Either way you win b/c you'll either produce a solid scene or not waste your time.
I think the ever growing demand for fresh faces puts him in a tough spot. As "joe consumer" why buy a $29 ZT tittle if it stars say Kira Kenner when you can buy a Vivid/Raw disc for $4.99. Therefore some of the unprofessonalism is to be expected the best thing you could do is print out or augment the rant and let them read before you sign up. At least then you did all you could do.
Porno movies, sexy videos, xxx. Adult DVD Talk at your service. 6409 Posts 11/99
Posted - Aug 18 2006 : 6:23PM
quaze - the rampant unprofessionalism in porn is the reason that those who display the smallest amount of professionalism are able to make an easy living. rant away, but know the competition for solid directors like you would be a lot greater if porn weren't full of bullshit.
that's what i tell myself every time we get ripped off.
(coming from the person who was ready to give up a couple weeks ago...)
So, what else is new? This is a new problem? Don't hire chicks you haven't actually seen, i.e., in person. If you do, and she doesn't look remotely like her pic on some agent's site, send her home without the kill fee. If she has a problem with that tell her to take it up with her handlers. They're the ones who put up the bullshit picture.
If she ain't giving at least 80% to the scene, tell her you're gonna call off the scene and see if that wakes her up. If it doesn't, send her packing. And don't give her the kill-fee on the set. Have a talk with her agent first and negotiate the kill-fee... Since when did $400 become the standard kill-fee?
Someone mentioned pornstarperformance. fuck that. that site has no credibility unless you happen to know who wrote whatever and you think they have some credibility.
I'm not telling yu your business. Like me, you've done this long enough and you know the score. But here's the deal, it ain't like there's a shortage of talent. Let's make the agents guarantee a little something more out of their clients then she'll simply be on the set on time. I mean, c'mon, who's paying who here?
quaze, once again, i felt really badly about that. i hope there is no hard feelings. believe me, i wish i could have continued with the scene! i guess we will try again next time! lol
From reading this thread, I'm just wondering where the responsibility of the director comes in to actually direct the scene in direction he wants it to go. If the director feels that the girl is giving a subpar performance, why not just tell her what he expects her to do instead of just getting frustrated and cancelling the entire scene because he doesn't like what he's filming? Does the girl actually complain all the time and say she doesn't want to be there, or does the director just assume this? The example provided of Jenna Haze is a fine example of an involved and proactive performer. However, the job of the porn actor/actress is to perform. They should not be expected to have to do the director's job too. If that's the case, what's the point of having a director in the first place? Might as well just let the girl direct the scene since she is obviously the one who is expected to not only fuck, but to also make sure the scene is outstanding from every other standpoint as well.
Having said that, I do believe that girls should be provided a kill fee, but not just for showing up. Directors should not have to pay a kill fee for a girl just walking through the door. However, if she gives a scene, but the scene is not complete because the director decided to cancel it (which is basically what the opening post of this thread says), then she should indeed be compensated for whatever work she has already done toward the scene. It is true that porn performers should not show up on set if they don't want to have sex. Likewise, directors should not take up the duty of directing if they expect the performers to be able to read their minds rather than just acknowledging them of what is expected in the scene. As in all other professions, I'm sure communication in porn also works both ways.
I find your presumptuousness amusing. Sex performance, particularly in the "gonzo" genre, requires a great deal of personality from the performers. There is no script. They are not playing characters. It is impossible to create a sexual personality for a performer who would rather be knitting a quilt. I can not "direct" someone to have a pulse other than to say things like "a little more enthusiasm... pretend your enjoying yourself....please don't make that face like you're smelling something bad..." Perhaps I should incorporate a taser into my repertoire. The bottom line is William Shatner will never be Robert Deniro and some girls presently working in porn should stay home and knit quilts. I'm sure you would do it much better than all of us if given the opportunity
[Link]
Eric381 Deactivated User
What are you looking at? It 2452 Posts 3/05
Posted - Aug 19 2006 : 1:03AM
Fuckin' Khrighst....don't say that??!! What would all us fanboys do without the great host & hostess of ADT?
Quaze...a carp? OUCH!!
Eric (who's getting his drink on at the midnight hour)...Sambuca, Quaze, Sambuca...goes down like Twizlers!
Tyler, nothing wrong with that. It would SUCK to wake up a week later with a dick that looked like a Christmas cactus all because you thought that "questionable sore" looked suspicous. Good for you, man!
Quaze -v- Realtip = battle of the minds, I'll go to PPV to watch this and even put bets on who wins.
Edited by - Eric381 on 8/19/2006 1:11:23 AM
[Link]
realtip Deactivated User
2301 Posts 6/04
Posted - Aug 19 2006 : 2:13AM
Mike Quasar wrote
Dude, don't be so sensitive. I meant nothing personal against you. My comments were not aimed specifically toward you or any one particular director, but was just about porn directors in general. It just so happens that you are the one who started this "drunken rant," so I was kinda speaking to you rather than about you.
Anyway, I'm just failing to see what makes a girl "unprofessional" simply because she doesn't sport a fake grin all through the scene or repeatedly holler those obnoxious fake moans that I just always love hearing. You say that the performers "are not playing characters," but it seems like that's kinda what you want them to do.
I remember on the first job I ever had, my boss called me in his office for my evaluation. It was a stellar evaluation with only one problem. Not my attendance. Not my job performance. Not any lack of skills or job knowledge. It was none of those things at all. Instead, the only complaint he had for me was that I didn't smile enough. Yes, that was his only complaint. He told me that I needed to look "more happy" about my work. So everytime he walked past me, I would have to wear a stupid fake grin on my face. Otherwise, he would scream, "Smile! Smile!" It was damn annoying. This is exactly what the situation you describe reminds me of.
Personally, I much rather see genuine reactions in porn. I am tired of all this fake "enthusiasm" that girls are always expected to have. It's one thing if the girl is undependable; she fails to show up on time or doesn't show up at all; she relentlessly complains; she looks a hot damn mess; she pulls stupid antics on set (such as throwing a tantrum or locking herself in a closet); she plain won't follow directions, etc. With all that, I can understand cancelling the scene and having issues with paying a kill fee. But to cancel a whole scene because the girl is not "pretending" to enjoy herself enough just seems crazy to me. Maybe she wants to hurry up and get the scene over with because she has her grocery shopping to do that day. Maybe she just wants to do her job, but is not really in the mood to put on a fake happy act. Who knows? As long as she shows up on set and does her job, why does she have to also "pretend" to enjoy herself about it too, especially if she's really not?
I read this and thought about how I miss the old Mike Quasarrants.com site. I remember the good old days when Jenna was just a girl getting into the business and dating your assistant Snoopy (or Spanky or whatever his name was). How things have changed.
She reminded about that. She remembers very clearly that I referred to her as the "Vixen of Violence" and the "Diva of Destruction" and also that she was going to sue me for something called "depliction" of character. Apparently she's forgiven me :)