Reviewers Recommend
Interview, The (All Her Luv)Interview, The (All Her Luv) - review by Danielmayu33216
Starring: Octavia Red, Ophelia Fae. Read review
All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 764 > My viewing policy (more of a guideline)
AuthorPost
Speelie
Senior Member

Fort Collins, CO
1191 Posts
5/01
Posted - May 8 2003 : 4:48PM
What follows is somewhat philosophical, somewhat like Mike Lyons' piece on porn and mood. The mods can move it where needed, if necessary.

I have noticed that I sometimes get frustrated with the directing style of certain scenes. Others voice this same complaint for different directors. For example, it is well known that I am a fan of Nacho's work, but lately, I haven't cared to see the same actresses from Nacho movies in David Luger or Pierre Woodman titles. Meanwhile, Wally, for example, would often rather see an actress in a Woodman scene. Others would rather see the same actress be in one of Brandon Irons' titles. This is fine, there's enough variety for all of us.

An issue that gets raised from time to time is boredom with an actress, after seeing her too many times. Ukrainian Alissa has been mentioned by some people, and I admit to find her overexposed.

What I have realized is that I can save myself some frustration, and also avoid burnout of some actresses, if I simply avoid movies in which I haven't enjoyed preceding volumes. So if I see that Woodman's latest scene collection has a bunch of my favorites, I will resist the temptation to view it, and instead await the DVD of a Nacho or Christoph movie with the same women. This isn't a rule set in stone, only a generalized plan of action, but so far, I like the results after a month or two of more selective viewing. And with so many new releases out there, this has also been an aid to my budget and time.

Has anyone else tried something like this, and does it sound like a good idea to those who have not?

DenverDon
Benevolent

Firmly Embedded in Depravity
5914 Posts
7/02
Posted - May 8 2003 : 10:23PM
Speelie,

This harks back to the thread that discussed, or asked the question, what's more important, the studio, the director, the star.

Sorry, I don't have the link to that.

If I recall correctly, a concensus generally boiled down studio, director, and then the star. A good studio, and a good director, can make a performer look pretty good. But if you have a hot performer (in your opinion) but don't like the directing style, or what the studio does with the presentations, then for all intents and purposes it sucks (in your opinion).

The plan you have outlined sounds like it would avoid a lot of the frustration of trying to pick up you favorite star, and then be frustrated because of the directing style, the theme as it's presented, and what the studio did.

And as you say, it can be an aid to your budget and time.

DenverDon

BIGmike
B-I-G-m-i-k-e

2335 Posts
3/01
Posted - May 8 2003 : 10:41PM
You know, I am gonna sound like Joey Silvera spokesperson or something, but I truly love what he does.

I can usually count on him to bring out the best in many performers. Just like I can count on many Evil Angel DVDs to be tops. Many already know that Evil Angel is a studio that delivers the goods.

Now I have probably seen 2 Nacho directed movies, maybe 3, while they were good, they weren't always my cup of coffee I have had one of the Killer Pussy's (#7) for over a year, haven't brought myself to review it yet, though I have scanned it. I think I may have only seen one under Ribas' direction.

I also haven't seen much of David Luger's direction, so I can't comment too much on him.

I do know that watching Julianna Sterling in Rookie Cookies 4 , directed by Luger, didn't seem lifeless, but seeing her in a Wax Lardcore film, totally destroyed her for me.

I will not think about what Wax did to Taylor Rain, because if I dwell on it, she'll be destroyed for me as well.

I usually don't follow girls, mainly because of Joey, who rarely films the same girl twice. So, I've grown to expect at least one good performance from a new girl with him, and might be surprised with another good performance from the same girl in another film.

There are several girls who I've seen once, but haven't seen since because I rarely buy from any other studio than the big 5.

So the director is key... if I see Joey Silvera in the title, I can be guaranteed one good scene, at minimum. Same goes for Jules Jordan, Mike John, Tom Byron [who recently broke off from Extreme, or so I read], and oh so many others out there.


”Time and money, two things I have so little of.
But if I had both, I’d be bored and rich.”
–BIGmike.

SueR
Member

Under a hill of books
262 Posts
12/02
Posted - May 12 2003 : 12:41AM
Uh...yeah...Speelie. Don't watch series you don't like. Good idea.
Goldmember
Member

518 Posts
7/02
Posted - May 12 2003 : 1:28AM
I agree with DenverDon "This harks back to the thread that discussed, or asked the question, what's more important, the studio, the director, the star."

I have found over time that there is the greatest chance of dissapointment if you buy based on the cast. Personally I think that the director is the best indicator of the type of product you are buying.

 
aybesea
Senior Member

Caroline Cage - Hungarian Hottie!
1485 Posts
5/02
Posted - May 12 2003 : 9:18AM
Another vote for director. No matter how strong the cast, the genre, or the box cover... the director has the most impact. I sometimes try stuff to see if I like it. Most of the time, if I didn't like the prior volumes, I don't like the recent one either. But if I try a new series from a fav director (like some of the new Thring stuff), it generally delivers the goods.



Jump To: