This harks back to the thread that discussed, or asked the question, what's more important, the studio, the director, the star.
Sorry, I don't have the link to that.
If I recall correctly, a concensus generally boiled down studio, director, and then the star. A good studio, and a good director, can make a performer look pretty good. But if you have a hot performer (in your opinion) but don't like the directing style, or what the studio does with the presentations, then for all intents and purposes it sucks (in your opinion).
The plan you have outlined sounds like it would avoid a lot of the frustration of trying to pick up you favorite star, and then be frustrated because of the directing style, the theme as it's presented, and what the studio did.
And as you say, it can be an aid to your budget and time.
DenverDon

