The site I got this pic http://img78.imageshack.us/my.php?image=nadia5xo.jpg from says her name's Nadia, but can anyone be more specific?
Edited by - Mojo on Oct 6 2005
[Link]
Mojo Deactivated User
1223 Posts 9/03
Posted - Oct 6 2005 : 7:55AM
What the hell??!! No link to images?! What the hell's going on here lately?! How the hell are we supposed to have a conversation if we can't show pictures of what we're talking about?! Oh well, just use the frickin' code on the address bar to see the blinkin' image.
Edited by - Mojo on 10/6/2005 7:55:15 AM
[Link]
DenverDon Benevolent
Firmly Embedded in Depravity 5914 Posts 7/02
Posted - Oct 6 2005 : 7:56AM
Link to a page, not an individual picture.
[Link]
Mojo Deactivated User
1223 Posts 9/03
Posted - Oct 6 2005 : 8:00AM
I can't remember it always being like this? Must be me using other forums too often, ones that allow links to individual pictures.
[Link]
Mojo Deactivated User
1223 Posts 9/03
Posted - Oct 6 2005 : 11:46AM
Hey all, the web address on my original post still works. All you have to do is cut and paste. So could someone tell me who she is?
ADT can not link directly to pictures because the revised 2257 regulations the government is attempting to implement would then classify ADT as a "secondary producer," and make ADT responsible to maintain the same 2257 proof-of-age documentation that the true actual producers of adult products (i.e. studios, magazines, websites with original content, etc.) are.
No one can meet the burdensome paperwork requirements this imposes on free speech and informational uses (like here on ADT). Therefore, smart webmasters, like Drew and Steph, revised their image posting policies to protect their asses from the planned prosecutions of the adult industry.
This is the nicest explanation you're going to get. As Drew said, search through the posts here on ADT using "2257" as the search term. Don't simply whine about it.
I suggest you also go to Free Speech Coalition and read up on what we're all doing about this (many of us here on ADT have joined as members to help protect our Constitutional rights as adults to view adult materials).
[Link]
Mojo Deactivated User
1223 Posts 9/03
Posted - Oct 7 2005 : 5:26PM
No worries. I wasn't whining as you put it. I was just a bit puzzled about why such a simple thing (at least in my eyes) was banned. Call me naive if you will, but there you go. I'm also not an expert on law, especially US law.
Hazel Heart Interview
Posted - Oct 6 2005 : 7:42AM