Reviewers Recommend My First Sex Teacher 88 - review by Captain Jack Starring: Kayla Paige, Skylar Snow, Rachael Cavalli, Armani Black [I] (2020s), Bunny Madison. Read review
Watched a not to be named video last night with two well known female stars - one had all natural small tits and the other had a thin body with two extremely large, hard grapefruits hung off to the side with too wide a gap between them. Every time the latter women got on all fours you could see the outline of the implant clearly through the skin like seeing erect nipples in a wet tee shirt contest. I love natural tits of all kinds and sizes and hate the lousy, grotesque implant jobs that are so obviously overdone. Are men in the industry encouraging the young women to stay natural or are they demanding "more cleavage"?
Why did Hillary Scott and Alectra Blue feel they needed to get implants when they were already so hot and naturally sexy?
Can you please give me the names of any female stars whose implants really make them look hotter and more appealing to you than they did before they got them?
Eva Angelina. Plenty hot and alluring teen cream dream before the boob job. Super-smoking hot woman now.
Sunrise Adams. She looked like a whole different person once she signed with Vivid. Some look at that as a negative. I think she looked 1 hex better.
Jada Fire. Didn't even know of her until she got pumped up and I caught her in Steve Holmes' Perversions. She's literally been on fire ever since.
Lucy Lee. I was initially against her augmentation but I've since changed my mind.
Catalina and Layla Rivera. Both were already two of the nastiest girls in the business (and that's expected when you hang around Max Hardcore) but there was a noticeable rise in their confidence level once they got implants.
Mari Possa 's been enhanced, too, right? I think she's hot but I never get to see her because I never see Seymour Butts' movies.
Edited by - Crucifixio_Jones on 2/26/2006 12:08:03 PM
I have noticed every set of Vivid tits looks the same. Do you ever get tired of "that Vivid tit look"?
Can't Vivid find a plastic surgeon who knows how to do the job without everybody knowing where he went in and exactly what he did? If I leave my barber shop and somebody says nice haircut, I will look for a new barber.
Haven't seen Electra's yet, but I think Hillary's look extremely good. They are the perfect size for her frame and amazing don't look all that unreal. It helps that she's sexy as hell.
Nothing says I love you so much as a tongue in the ass. 2884 Posts 1/03
Posted - Feb 26 2006 : 12:51PM
As much as I respect CJ, I disagree with him on every woman listed except Layla Rivera, who I don't know. A lot of these women are led to believe that it will enhance their ability to work, either in front of the camera or as feature dancers. I don't know that it's the truth but it seems to be the conventional wisdom. Not all boob jobs are horrible and usually work well if there was empty area to be filled in the first place. Hillary's look good and will be even better if the scarring under her areolae disappears completely. She had space to fill. I don't like Lucy Lee's breasts. She was a firm A cup and her look made me salivate. Now she has bolt ons. Only Vanessa Lane gets away with that look in my book. Jada Fire started out pretty large, but maybe a little floppy. She's very aware of positions that make her look bad like doggy where the bag puckers. Mari Possa and Eva Angelina went from being extraordinarily cute to stripper slut looking. Their enhancements are obvious which tends to turn me off a bit. I think Catalina looks ridiculous with hers and Sunrise went too big.
The first four that come to mind are Juli Ashton, Terri Summers, Victoria Paris, and Devinn Lane, but they all (have) had their implants their whole career. I guess that means I can't think of a single porn star who I found more attractive after she got implants than before, except for maybe Hillary Scott. I don't think it's entirely a psychological thing where just because I've seen the before I can't enjoy the after. For instance, there are some girls with implants who look good to me when they are standing still, but when they get in motion and the bolt-ons stay perfectly still or, even worse, part like the red sea I get turned off.
Jane tells me Hillary looks better after than before and needed to do something. Hillary needed a little lift, had room and was sensible with the enhancement. So we agree 100% with your comments especially the no-motion, red sea part .... that is a God awful look and seems prevalent in a lot of these "LA/Vivid boob jobs".
And looking at your avatar, we gotta believe you're in favour of all natural! (I'd stick a smilie in here to show I'm trying to be funny, but I hate the damn things.)
Naturally, folks are going to disagree as this is a hot topic and always will be. I'm not really going to argue my picks since that's futile. To all of those with an opposing point of view I simply say "to each his own" and "add Rio Mariah to my list."
[Link]
gapeape Deactivated User
usa 106 Posts 2/06
Posted - Feb 26 2006 : 7:12PM
with a few exceptions, i hate fake breasts. they seldom make the girls look more attractive, on the contrary, they make girls look much less attractive.
small breasts are fine. there is nothing wrong with small natural breasts. in fact, many guys i know prefer small or medium sized breasts rather than huge breasts which a lot of implants seem to be.
yes, it is a big turnoff to see the "ridges" and unnatural space between each breast.
i can't think of one porn star i consider one of my favorites who has fake breasts.
jenna jameson is the perfect example. she was way better looking before the implants. but the fact that she became a huge star has probably influenced lot of girls decisions to get implants. that's a shame.
breast implants, mainly the large ones, just look like the girl has aliens inside her chest or something. it looks like there is something in there that is going to bust out at any moment. it's actually quite frightening.
Julia Bond's boob job looks good IMO. Kaylynn's new rack looks really good too. Also I like the way Hillary's boobs look now. I also asgree that Jenna Jameson looked better all natural, but like Crucifixio_Jones says, it's all a matter of opinion, and or taste.
Natural tits are much more prevalent in porn now than a generation ago--don't let the exceptions fool you. There was a stretch between 1985-95 where the majority of the top female performers were enhanced. Which probably encouraged other girls to do it. Since then, we've slowly moved back to the all-natural look (with breasts, I mean). I think the rail-thin Jenna Haze body has been the biggest selling look over the last few years, although full-figured girls have been more common again lately.
The other thing which may have changed since the 1990's is that, during that period, many of the girls worked as feature dancers before going into porn--and big boobs are more mandatory (fake or not) in the dancing circuit. Today, it seems fewer girls start as dancers, but rather tend to go to dancing after they get their share of box-covers, etc. So maybe today you are likely to see girls getting enhanced on their way out of the video business, instead of on their way in.
Although there does seem to be a non-stop express bus from Tampa to porn valley . . .
I'd like to believe that certain studios don't encourage talent to go bigger, but I really can't. It seems that starlets change their appearence once they sign a contract with a big studio, and I guess that could be because they could feature dance. Strippers with smaller boobies probably don't get much money compared to those with grapefruit sized titties.
I like natural, I am not opposed to surgical enhancements, but I'd prefer natural. It used to be for me, when a star got implants, I'd lose some interest in her, and eventually I'd have none.
- -B -I -G -m -i -k -e, here and there, over and out! - -
As far as I'm concerned, there are only 2 conditions that would warrant implants:
1. If the woman is completely flat chested: If you look like a little boy with your clothes off, then fine, go for it.
2. If she has saggy, droopy tits due to extreme weight loss or child birth. That is the only kind of tits that feel worse to the touch than those basketballs they put on your torso at the surgeon's office.
Sadly, most women who get implants have no business getting them. A good example of that is Tera Patrick. Destroying those perfect tits should be deemed crazy enough to have her institutionalized against her will.
Maybe one day with advancements in medical technology they will come up with a material that accurately mimics the look and feel of breast tissue. Right now fake tits are the equivalent of a bad toupe on a man.
I hope you are correct and that "au naturale" beauty and bodies are coming back from the 90's look. No doubt there are better surgical techniques now than in the mid-80's or 90's. From our discussion here there is general consensus that some girls do look better after enhancement(i.e. Hillary Scott, Lanny Barbie, Jenna Jameson). At the same time, we have some agreement that some women who didn't need enhancement to look sexy have wasted money and others sadly have gone too far with implants that look unnatural.
From my modest experience in observing dancers at strip clubs, I would say the "natural look" is in there and the "unnatural" look is less prevalent there than in porn. So I'm not sure dancing careers after porn would be a driver of "overdone implants" in the women we see in porn.
dicknjane
[Link]
gapeape Deactivated User
usa 106 Posts 2/06
Posted - Feb 28 2006 : 7:06PM
i think i was the only one to mention jenna jameson and i said she was the perfect example of a girl who looked great BEFORE getting implants. jennna jameson's implants are terrible, like most implants.
so where's the consensus?
the consensus is that girls, with few exceptions, look better with their natural breasts. girls, especially petite girls, just look silly when they get large breast implants. they stop looking real and just look like cartoon characters.
well, its verryy haard here to get total agreement on anything, but it was my impression that the thinking was not all implants were bad, but that people in general don't like the bad ones. now there's one post from someone that says more boobs = good boobs so he could argue the other side as well. ain't life grand that we can reach "consensus" even though we don't agree.
i think, especially america, where there is a real silicon craze, ppl have seen so many silicon racks that u just dont really notice how fucked up and unnatural it looks.
but yes. some fake racks do look good, no doubt, now we all are just waiting for alektra to flash us :)
Agreed - I saw an episode of Porno Valley with Briana Banks going under the knife to get a reduction and i shit you not, moments before getting Ko'd she decided to go bigger. Crazy
Going too big so they look like missles ready to burst through the skin isn't the way to go. Increase in shape and size that still allows a natural look does it for me.
Tiffany Minx Jill Kelly
[Link]
gapeape Deactivated User
usa 106 Posts 2/06
Posted - Mar 1 2006 : 9:48AM
some breast implants look better thn others. i even think some look good, but, NONE of them look natural.
the only ones i think look good are the small ones. NONE of the big ones look good to me, they just look ridiculous.
There is so much breast augmentation information out there on the internet that I can't imagine any woman in porn getting a bad job, having those disfiguring scars or overfilled basketballs in this day and age. It's totally unnecessary. Old adage: Measure twice; cut once.
Supposedly Vivid sends all their girls to Garth Fisher in Berverly Hills. Sunrise didn't like the set that he originally gave her and had them redone elsewhere.
Natural boobs have not been 'in' for years, with the exception of big natural boobs, which are now their own niche. If natural boobs were in, there would not be so many girls getting implanted.
Did Tera Patrick ever explain the logic behind her getting implants? Maybe it was a peer pressure situation, because so many other performers have them.
Well, if one guy does every Vivid girl, that explains why they all look the same, but I still don't know why they all have to look so unnatural. They never move and look the same no matter whether the women are standing up or lying down. I'm not a booby shake fan but those boobies don't move at all.
It would be interesting to know what drives some women to get the implants and yet others decide not to. Maybe Gia Jordan or Kami will give us the inside scoop on what goes on in this regard ... I'm sure they know.
I prefer natural tits, but some of me favorite partners have fake ones. Hillary Scott and Jada Fire were already mentioned here. Some tit jobs are really ugly, but some are OK and some are really good. In the end I think the personality is the most important.
I don't know but I totally agree. I don't care if the tits are large, small, medium, saggy, whatever. I just prefer them natural. The fake ones are almost always obvious, don't move in a natural way and are actually very distracting. I can kind of get past it if I'm really attracted to the girl and she has good skills but it's still kind of upsetting that an otherwise beautiful woman would do that to herself.
Implants work really well when a girl already has D cup to start with (like Carmella) and then gets then pumped up some more. Vanessa Blue's are another good example of great implants. Oh, and Rebecca Love is another fabulous example. People in the KSEX chatroom ALWAYS think that hers are real, but they are enhanced.
Thanks for the link ... went, looked and Carmella's new tits are an example of what I personally call the grapefruit look. I'll bet grabbing hold of those would be like checking fresh fruit at the grocery store. I always like firmness in my fruit but when it come to tits, I prefer a little softer feel. I guess this just proves that we all see tits differently. The good thing is we all agree we love tits and ass ... "beauty appears to be in the eye of the beholder" ... you can quote me on that.
Defo natural tits for me, they look so much nicer and sexier then fake ones. I think (and it's only an opinion) that european girls in porn seem to have the nicest tits. Mainly becuase it's mostly natural, or I think it is. If I was to make a top ten list of the best looking tits in porn the majority of the girls would be based in europe, check this site out for what I mean clicky
Some people are crazy about big boobs, but can look past them if a small-breasted girl has a lot of other pluses. For me, it's that way with augmented boobs -- I tend not to like them, but if the woman is really appealing it ultimately doesn't matter much.
I was in porn-fan "despair" a couple of years ago when I heard that Venus was having her tits done, but her surgeon did an especially great job. She was amazing looking before and she's amazing looking now.
Hillary Scott and Kinzie Kenner strike me the same way. I wish they hadn't but I don't mind that they did.
Hillary did enhance her tits and actually made herself look better and she already looked great. I also wish they didn't feel thay had to do it, but if they gotta do it I hope they select a size which enhances but leaves you wondering if they are "real" in any position. Also I hope they select a surgeon who leaves no visible scars; the worst looking natural tits are better looking than the best looking visible scars.
No matter what size the tits are....play with them.... 732 Posts 12/08
Posted - Apr 15 2009 : 12:20PM
Dick Head wrote: boobs = power. ________________________________________________________________________________ That's a good call, my wife has big boobs...J.
