University Coeds Oral Exams 10
Sex Addicts 1
Sex Offenders 1
These three are her only titles listed for the year 2002 on iafd.
TB
[Link]
Penny Flame @ Adult Empire| Author | Post |
|---|---|
| Robert Member  My past is a foreign country. Most things are different there, including word usage. 503 Posts 12/06 |  Posted - Mar 22 2011 : 2:48PMRecall reading here on ADT that it was her first BB/G threesome. After-hours in deserted bar. Behind bar. Two guys (naturally). Don't remember the names of the two guys nor the plot. Need the title. Thanks. [Link] |
| T0MBOne Senior Member 1200 Posts 5/08 | Posted - Mar 22 2011 : 6:13PM University Coeds Oral Exams 10 Sex Addicts 1 Sex Offenders 1 These three are her only titles listed for the year 2002 on iafd. TB [Link] |
| Robert Member My past is a foreign country. Most things are different there, including word usage. 503 Posts 12/06 | Posted - Mar 22 2011 : 9:50PM University Coeds Oral Exams is a BJ gonzo and not a BB/G three-way. Sex Addicts 1 (2002) ==>Scene 5. Penny Flame, Chris Charming (not a three-way) Sex Offenders 1 (2002) didn't give a scene listing and seems to be OOP [Link] |
| Robert Member My past is a foreign country. Most things are different there, including word usage. 503 Posts 12/06 | Posted - Mar 23 2011 : 9:37PM Scene 7 - "...what was advertised as Penny's first B/B/G scene." [Link] |
| ObiBong Senior Member 1162 Posts 12/02 | Posted - Mar 25 2011 : 7:26AM [Link] |
| Robert Member My past is a foreign country. Most things are different there, including word usage. 503 Posts 12/06 | Posted - Mar 25 2011 : 12:48PM That would have been a nice effect. If done correctly (slowly) the viewer would not have realized that everything became clearer as the scene progressed. There was some dialog that served not only to enhance the plot (unusual for porn flicks) but it also clarified the "too dark to see clearly" sex action. I wonder if it was the cameraman? Didn't have the correct setting for the lens aperture. Also, could it have been corrected/caused when it was printed? As ObiBong noted in his review - "It's non-anamorphic, the transfer is very grainy and noisy and there are technical glitches galore -- scratches and lines on the film like it's from the 1940s, other things I can't even describe." All in all, good intent, poor execution and results. [Link] |
| Use the code below to link to this topic or a specific post. |
| URL of this thread |
| Link to this post with HTML |
| Link to this post with Forum Code |