Over the past few years, I've compiled some pretty good stuff. I used all cam models from a pretty popular site and have video and written consent from most of them stating they give permission to post footage for whatever purposes I decide.
- deepthroat - gagging - snot play - Vomit - drinking vomit - piss - drinking piss - girls eating each-other's vomit - eating vomit out of toilet - licking toilet - eating cigarettes - choked out - tit/face slapped to tears
Theres a lot.
About 500+ videos of stuff nobody has seen before. And a lot of the girls are hot. Includes, Russians, Colombians and Americans.
Is there enough of a demand for this genre to put quick edits together and release these?
Except Brandon seems to have ethical business practices and supports sex worker rights, so I doubt he would do business with anyone who secured permission from "most" of the people involved and would likely avoid content where levels of consent are in doubt (e.g. performers being told what to do and/or begging to stop). In fact, I'm guessing Brandon wouldn't touch this with a ten foot pole.
That and also that having permission doesn't necessarily address the issue of 2257 regulations which I'm not sure the OP has at the moment. Frankly this feels more like a scam than anything else.
Sorry, if someone is being abused on camera and is begging for it to stop, and it's not acted or faked (as in pro wrestling for example) then she is not giving her consent and it becomes an assault.
Looks like your ideas have gone down like the vomit you're so fond of.
If there is no one in the room, who is providing "voice over telling the girls what to do"? Is the voice over a transcription of requests sent via Internet and added afterwards? Which entity are the girls begging to stop the show? The men out in the ether typing their requests? That seems rather strange. Three possibilities come to mind: 1. there are indeed people in the room running the show, 2. there are people somewhere else--not directly in that room but observing from somewhere--running the show, or 3. the woman is solo and the begging and crying are a performance.
[Link]
upsux Deactivated User
919 Posts 10/17
Posted - Jun 10 2019 : 3:03PM
So to sum it up - they keep going, keep crying, and keep begging for it to stop or they don't get paid... reading that right?
They are paid per minute. They set the amount and they decide when they want to stop. There is nobody in the room.
There is nobody in the next room. All decision from when they start, if they start, when they stop and how much per minute they are paid during the show is up to them,
the person who set up the show. Are u aware of camgirl websites? There are many which have different rates but overall, they work the same.
A model decides how much per minute. The guy has an account. That account is continuously withdrawn at the agreed upon rate until either the model or the purchaser decide to stop the show.
the balance comes between what is the model willing to do based on the money she is making. Some girls will not do anything mentioned in OP because its a hard limit or no amount of money would entice them to do those acts. While others have a much lower threshold. And then how long they will do these things comes into play. But they are aware that the longer they do it, the more they make. So, they have to decide for themselves (unless the buyer does), how long they will continue the show.
"monetary motivation" So if they quit they don't get paid , looks like coerction to me, exploiting women in dire need of money Are they losing their house, have a sick kid, a terminal ill mother? Let's talk about "monetary Motivation" and them begging to stop but still not quitting , and they gave consent to specifically what it's done to them or just "a little rough sex" "with "artistic changes on the run"?
You bring some sanity to what would otherwise be utter madness. That and you help clean the mess the rest of us do. It's just that some days the mess is a lot bigger than usual and it stinks a lot more. You have to remember that trolls do poop a lot.
Porno movies, sexy videos, xxx. Adult DVD Talk at your service. 6409 Posts 11/99
Posted - Jun 27 2019 : 8:58AM
Thanks, Pat. As we think about how to support the cam industry I'm beginning to think we should stick to professional porn where there is at least some transparency and oversight. Monetary motivation...
I've never been on a cam site though I have considered it. But based on this thread I think I'll scratch it off my list of things to do. I had no idea that it could be so exploitative until I read this. After giving it some thought based on this thread it seems to me that cam sites could be far more exploitative than mainstream porn where the model has a lot of control and knows what she's getting into even before she gets on set.
regarding tastes in porn, each it's own. regarding exploitation, not all cammodels are desperate, not all of them do the style that is presented, some say yes, some say no. For money? Yes. But your favorite pornstar who do anal in real life and don't do on camera until the right time, it's also a question of money ;) And some never do :) I think all that is really judgy. Personally i'm not into necesserly all of that, but i'd like to discuss with you TerrySilvers:)
all the judgmental things that was said about this guy and his fetishes
whatever people can think, be it mega vanilla porn or the most hardcore, all is objectification of the women (end sometimes men). I find it funny when people react as deeply angry about that. You can not like certan things, but at least if it's not in a sort of forced coercion, you can not like it or approve it, but being judgy is a bit hypocritical in my point of view. And what's funny, i know i have many chances to be judged by sharing my point of view xD Ah, the modern world ....
Edited by - captainxx-2008 on 7/26/2019 12:18:20 PM
^ No one is being judgey about preferences. People are rightfully cautious about and disconcerted by what sounds like abusive and coercive conditions. Equating this concern to kink shaming is lazy and disingenuous.
I'm apart of multiple fetish websites and a lot of the things the OP posted can be found on tube fetish sites. I'm also a member on a lot of these cam websites and it's pretty normal for the kink actresses to do these things. Unfortunately, I think the ADT community is still mostly vanilla and these type of acts would not be permissible on this website.
I see neither the OP, nor those who dismiss criticism as 'judgy' have answered the point I made that if these scenes are not faked as claimed, and there is actual coercion, then criminal assault is being promoted and condoned.
They are captured webcam shows that the OP mostly has ripped from tube fetish sites. A lot of these girls are from LiveJasmin's fetish section and they are located in Columbia or European countries. These are trained professional women who have done these kink fetishes hundreds of times and are used to whatever gross unimaginable thing you can think of from piss to puke and poo. They are paid to perform these acts. Most of them work in cam modeling houses and the owners do not permit any form of bodily harm that could prevent the females from working. Also you shouldn't be labeling this as criminal assault since your previous comments show you don't understand the context of that word and any real law student is having a good laugh at your expense.