2. thread on raincoaters

3. Cowgirl - she rides him. Reverse cowgirl - she rides him, but facing the other direction (his feet).

4. The Private movies that I have seen (Faust, Italian Flair, Gladiator) were all annoying, for various reasons.

5. I agree with the term 'All girl.' Most of the women are not lesbians, they just get paid to do girls.

[Link]

- Saki [faqs]

[Link]

FWIW: The original theatrical release of THE OWL AND THE PUSSY contained a shot where Barbara Steisand tells a bunch of young punks to go "Fuck off!"

Not long after its release that one part of the scene was cut, and the result is that the scene doesn't quite play right on the VHS release (you can't figure out why it ends with the punk agrily chasing Barbara and George. Maybe the missing line has been restored on the DVD.

-T.C.

[Link]

Edited by - M.B. on 8/17/2003 11:12:32 PM

[Link]

But while I can understand the reasoning behind what you're saying (judging the name by the preference of the actors involved) I think that it really should be about the fiction that's being portrayed on the screen - not about what happens behind the scenes. If it's a movie about a lesbian couple, it shouldn't matter what the sexual preferences of the performers is - it should be a lesbian movie.

Having said that, I don't believe that most of these "all girl" movies really are about the portrayal of lesbian couples / groups. Don't most of them simply revolve around "straight" women who get together with girlfriends, talk about their male partners, and then who get it on with each other? In that sense, you'd be right to call it "all girl".

Still, in yet another sense, there's a point where these distinctions are a little bit ridiculous when you consider it all. At best, these "straight" women are really bi...

Edited by - Mythsong on 8/18/2003 12:03:26 AM

[Link]

TonyC wrote:

[Link]

Edited by - YogaGrrl on 8/18/2003 12:27:23 AM

[Link]

P.S. Personally, I would always prefer the company of a woman to that of a girl. And, yes, at the very least the terms used should be consistent across gender lines.

Edited by - Mythsong on 8/18/2003 1:02:13 AM

[Link]

Some threads just turn out to be unexpectedly funny!

[Link]

To get back to the original question, my WAG is that "all girl" is simply more concise than "lesbian movies;" it gets the point across fast in a short space, and yes, it's kind of cute (potentially less threatening, as Walter pointed out).

[Link]

Good question. Probably NOT. Here is an interesting thought experiment: take your favourite hetero gonzo film (e.g. Euro Angels Hardball 20), imagine how it would look with an all-female cast, then compare this to the all-female stuff actually on the market. The difference is huge!! Almost all lesbian hardcore is low-paced, low-energy, dildo insertion stuff. Many people are so disappointed with the harder lesbian videos, that they now prefer the softer material (with lots of kissing, pussy licking, breast play etc). See for example the LezLoveVideo website.

>What can you recommend?

* Buttslammers: well okay, this is lesbian hardcore. But it is very peculiar and I don't recommend it. The scenes start with dancing, the girls use a lot of oil, and they wear rubber gloves... [see how this infinitely far from gonzo?]
* Everybody wants some: this is similar to Buttslammers (same label: NuTech), but actually slightly better, since there is no dancing.
* Bella's Perversions: widely recommended but I haven't seen it yet.
* Sky's Perversions: similar to Bella's Perversions but (apparently) not as good.
* Dirty Girlz: this is a recent Jewel D'Nyle title that got some positive reviews here at ADT. In my opinion you better avoid it, because it is mediocre and boring and has nothing to do with gonzo.
* Gut gebaut und top versaut: this is a Videorama title. Actually it is just another Harry S. Morgan film (so it has a lot of fisting and anal) but this one is with an all-female cast. I like it! It is easily better than 99 % of the American lesbian porn on the market.

[Link]