Little Puck Interview| Author | Post |
|---|---|
| tritone Deactivated User 1009 Posts 4/03 |  Posted - Apr 9 2006 : 4:57PMOK. Well not really. But their recent POV BJ release, Liquid Diet , while otherwise a very solid title, commits an almost unforgivable sin. In the main title intro there is a portion of a scene that does not appear in the movie!!! . This is the absolute worse kind of deception. It is worse than having something on the boxcover not show up in the movie. The scene in question is with "Emily": a cute brunette with a stacked body and nice, full lips. Well in the previews you see Mark Wood lying down (on a bed?) and getting sucked off by her in POV. Her beautiful eyes looking right into camera as her head bobs up and down. But when you get to her scene that part is nowhere to be found. The entire scene, while still very good, is shot from a standing-up perspective with Emily on her knees. Now I know that this mistake was probably not intentional. Most likely that part was edited out after the main titles were made. Or maybe the main titles were put together by a different person who had no idea what was going to make the final movie. Either way it doesn't make it any less dissapointing for the viewer. P.S. - I checked and the footage is not included in any behind the scenes or bonus footage. It does not exist at all on the DVD!!! P.S. #2 - A still from that missing portion is also on the back boxcover! Can you belive it? Double deception!!! Edited by - tritone on Apr 9 2006 Edited by - tritone on Apr 9 2006  [Link] |
| -Kelly- Senior Member 2517 Posts 5/03 | Posted - Apr 9 2006 : 5:27PM Okay. If you weren't intentionally pulling a Colbert with the thread title then that joke makes no sense. Anyway, the type of thing you are describing used to happen quite a bit, particularly in compilations. I know from experience how annoying it can be. Edited by - -Kelly- on 4/9/2006 5:29:21 PM  [Link] |
| Crucifixio_Jones Senior Member Arrogant & Obnoxious Narcissist 4727 Posts 10/03 | Posted - Apr 9 2006 : 5:48PM My example: I have Squirt for Me POV 4 and during the opening credits, Victoria Lan is shown looking really hot in the missionary position. When you get to her chapeter, this doesn't occur. I figure it was cut for good reasons but for whatever reason it was cut, then it shouldn't be included in the starting montage, either. [Link] |
| tritone Deactivated User 1009 Posts 4/03 | Posted - Apr 9 2006 : 5:59PM [Link] |
| Mark Wood Member 61 Posts 6/04 | Posted - Apr 9 2006 : 9:28PM [Link] |
| tritone Deactivated User 1009 Posts 4/03 | Posted - Apr 9 2006 : 10:09PM Thanks for the reply. Like I said, it is a real good movie otherwise. Nice POV shooting and a great selection of girls. There was some gagging (which I dislike), but not enough to be a big problem. I just wish that part with Emily made the final cut! She was one of my favorite girls in the whole thing. [Link] |
| Mike Quasar Zero Tolerance Reluctant pornographer 1765 Posts 7/01 | Posted - Apr 9 2006 : 10:16PM [Link] |
| Mark Wood Member 61 Posts 6/04 | Posted - Apr 9 2006 : 10:40PM Quaze-I see you got tired of looking at me naked in your computer and took the time to post. Just remember those aren't pillows. [Link] |
| PL Senior Member God hates us all, you know it's true, God hates this place. - Slayer 1726 Posts 10/03 | Posted - Apr 10 2006 : 10:07AM "What? The land of the free? Whoever told you that is your enemy" - RATM [Link] |
| Use the code below to link to this topic or a specific post. |
| URL of this thread |
| Link to this post with HTML |
| Link to this post with Forum Code |
