okay, i've had enough. i'm just watching wicked's "hook-ups", which features the umpteenth pairing of real-life couple nicole sheridan and voodoo. damn, as much as i love checking out sheridan's nasty ways this becomes real old now. there's two bones i have to pick i guess. firstly, isn't it kinda boring to watch the same two pieces of talent boning away time and again? and secondly, how do you peeps out there feel about watching real-life couples? to me it even feels kinda uneasy to watch a real-life couple in a hollywood movie. is it just me or are there any more weird feelings out there? please nicole and voodoo, rethink your agreement or whatever the reason is we won't really see you guys shagging other people!
normally I would agree that watching scenes whith always the same couple is lame but not Nicole and Voodoo. Nicole is dead gorgeous and Voodoo is very good looking guy!
imo 90's couple Racquel Darrian and Derek Lane was way more boring!
Nicole and Voodoo are extraordinary performers and their scenes together are usually smoldering but the inherent problem with any porn couple is that one gets the feeling that they are seeing the same scene over and over again after awhile no matter how hot it may be.
At least Voodoo can get the job done. Some of the hottest chicks in porn over the years have been tethered to useless, flaccid goons.
I always try to shy away from movies with real life couples because watching real life couples in action is not that thrilling to me, it's very boring. Of course not counting the Tricia Deveraux-John Stagliano scene from Buttman's Toy Stories because that was one of the best scenes I have ever seen.
I hate it even more when girls only want to work with their boyfriend/husband, that's ever more boring.
I don't see what the big deal is, how many of you actually watch porn to see the guys? In my opinion a chicks performance is going to be similar with just about any guy she is comfortable with. All of the starlets have some kind of signiture way of boning down and the guy they're with doesn't really change this.
I agree entirely. I saw Hook Ups also and was yet again disappointed to see the Sheridan/Voodoo pairing. She is quite hot, and the first couple of times I saw them together was fine. But now it is just old. No, I don't care all that much about the male talent, but watching these two over and over makes me just crave seeing her with ANYONE else. I believe Nicole does do Randy Spears in Hook Ups, but of cours Voodoo is right there next to her so to me it doesn't qualify.
Good answer Walter! I'd have to say that part of the problem is the formula to which porn scenes have been reduced. If we didn't see the same progression of sex acts every time, then watching couples wouldn't be so much 'more of the same.'
Walter Burns wrote:I'm with Hardware -- this is a great answer, Walter.
In fact, I prefer watching real-life couples in porn videos. The sex can be incredibly passionate and very intense. The Amber Michaels/Frank Fortuna scene in "Ass Worship 2", for instance, is a scorcher. Something special can happen when two people are hot for each other and comfortable with each other -- a breakdown of the distinction between "performance" and "reality" (in Walter's terminology, I think, "blissful rupture"). IMHO, THAT is the essence of great porn.
For what it is worth, I filmed Nicole and her Husband Voodoo. I swear to you, they did the ultra-nastiest scene of their careers in my movie Juggernaut. She was beyond throat fucked in the full U-Arched, Kerkove heel grab. It was insane. Slobber flew everywhere, sometimes over 2 feet long. They were spitting in each othewrs faces. Nicole was kind enough to stick 4 of her black latex fingers deeply into her ass. Nicole gaped the size of a mother trucking silver dollar, not a quarter a silver dollar!!! Nicole and Voodoo tore it up, like you have never, ever seen them do! They rule! They were incredable. I cannot compliment either one of them enough! It was extremely hardcore from begining to end! If you ever want to see Nicoles wildest, most hardcore scene of her career to date. It is in Juggernauts. Juggernauts is available this week. No big boob movie has ever been shot this hardcore. Double anals, spitting, slapping, Cum farting ass the other girl, slurps, sucks and violently swallows every drop of cum, ass juice and lube out of the other girls ass. There are 2 double anals in the movie. Big time anal stretching at its finest occurs in this movie! Total Glamour and full on fetish ware clothing. The movie is a specialty tape, it is not for everybody! My God, you have never seen a big tit movie filmed like this before. I do know one other person who would dig it for sure!!!!! John Stagliano would enjoy "Juggernaut" Skeeter Kerkove "Sodomy cures the sick, prevents heart attacks and has even raised the dead" God Bless Sodomy and God Bless You! "Proudly serving God and Country", one anal movie at a time! Porn producer, director, performer. I am a huge fan of hardcore porn and I love all of the women in porn. "God Bless Pornography" A womans ass is a beautiful thing" Woman rule!
IAFD, supporters of beastiality. Just say no. 7564 Posts 11/02
Posted - Aug 5 2003 : 8:15AM
Thank you, but is it quotable?The formulaic nature of a lot of porn (scenes) is the main reason why I believe that we fans both ask too much and too little form porn producers, as I indicated in another thread. Look at the main forum here and you can see for yourself that the majority of the posters are asking for MORE standardization, preferably of their own personal likes. The fact that those likes are quite divers allows companies an easy way out when differentiating their output, while at the same time standardizing it. A company like RLD is built on this principle. The problem for me is, when differentiation processes are in line with standardization processes, "creativity" takes a step back and the (aesthetic) formal system is beginning to get cast in iron. This creates what I call a "flatline aesthetic", with no highs and no lows, where everything (should) look the same. When the formal system is cast in iron, the only thing that can be used successfully to differentiate your product is a distinctive stylistic system. I have yet to see a truly intelligent discussion on the stylistic system of porn on this or any other board.
BIGmike said: "I'm too fucking paranoid of disease that follows some sexual encounters to bother fucking."
Walter Burns wrote:I didn't, but I do now. Thanks, Walter! That is very quotable -- which has nothing to do with MY poll of YOUR quotes, does it? I mean, did anyone else get to choose their personal favorite from their posts for your polls?
IAFD, supporters of beastiality. Just say no. 7564 Posts 11/02
Posted - Aug 6 2003 : 10:09AM
Uhmm.. thanks but no thanks. I have learned my lesson well. Besides I am a coward and a lazy bastard.
Maybe I will write something soon about narrative structure and porn. You know, some basic things, like the difference between fabula and sujet, leading to such things as the systematically different relationships between story time, plot time and screen time that are characteristic for classical cinematic storytelling versus porn storytelling. Or maybe I won't write such a thing at all, because I am a coward and a lazy bastard.
duganrm said: "I think once or twice a year is keeping a good pace."
Two my favorite girls right now Nicole Ray and Faye Reagan perform with their real life boyfriends and I think their scenes are very hot. The chemistry definitely shows. Luckily, they both do other guys as well.
I almost always enjoyed Jill Kelly and Julian's scenes. I think you're mor likely to get honest to god chemistry out of scenes like that. Those two always delivered.
Maybe, but they can also tend to fall into the same patterns too. I suppose that's not unlike any other scene or film though. I don't have a problem with couples on film, but I will admit I'll usually want to see them with somebody else soon after though. Just works better for me on a fantasy level, plus I think different people tend to add different elements a lot o times.