Reviewers Recommend
Tres ViasTres Vias - review by Captain Jack
Starring: Christian Clay, Alex Jones, Blake Blossom, Azul Hermosa, Madi Collins, Matthew Meier, Melanie Marie, Sky Wonderland, Eve Sweet, Rikako Katayama, Vixi Rafi. Read review
All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 612 > No Hands?
AuthorPost
Endless Loop
Senior Member


Tomatometer
1129 Posts
8/04
Posted - Sep 7 2005 : 5:17AM
Why when giving head, are girls so often instructed to cease and desist, applying their hands to said cock?

Is it they can't restrain from unloading otherwise?
In years past, I never recall this being such a prevalent directive?
Personally, I rather enjoy seeing a delicate set of fingers stroking a pole, in conjunctive rythm with a succulent set of slurping lips, and if it means losing it, so be it.

Blow away I say, then if necessary, wait a half hour, and move on with the rest of the scene.

Loraine
Senior Member

1559 Posts
3/04
Posted - Sep 7 2005 : 8:07AM
I'm with you EL I like to watch blow jobs with hands on the cock, it seems more active on the part of the giver.
picman
Senior Member

Nothing says I love you so much as a tongue in the ass.
2884 Posts
1/03
Posted - Sep 7 2005 : 8:15AM
As Wesley Pipes is wont to say "If the dick is hard, why do you need your hands". Actually they become an obstruction for the camera view. No hands looks better.
tritone
Deactivated User

1009 Posts
4/03
Posted - Sep 7 2005 : 9:51AM
This is my feeling. I watch BJs to see the image of girls beautiful lips wrapped around a dick. If her hand obscures this too often, the effect is lost.

Its okay every now and then when trying to coax out the final load. But too much hand ruins the scene from the viewers perspective.

Do Not Filter My Results
Member

173 Posts
6/05
Posted - Sep 7 2005 : 12:44PM
I like a combo of both. The hands working the dick is hot to me cause that's how I've received head in the real world.
 
mrsome
Member

montreal, canada
20 Posts
8/05
Posted - Sep 7 2005 : 10:30PM
+1 for No Hands
Walter Burns
Legendary Quoter

IAFD, supporters of beastiality. Just say no.
7564 Posts
11/02
Posted - Sep 7 2005 : 10:52PM
+ 1 for no blow jobs




Mr. Pete said:
“Czech girls have mostly self naturally lubricated asses”
Walter All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

1445 Posts
3/05
Posted - Sep 8 2005 : 12:13AM
Fellow Walter,
You have been possessed by the nefarious Dr. Evil!
Seek help immediately! Only a bj queen with superhuman slurp-power can save you!
Walter Burns
Legendary Quoter

IAFD, supporters of beastiality. Just say no.
7564 Posts
11/02
Posted - Sep 8 2005 : 1:37AM
You can call me Mr. Burns, you know, just so we avoid confusing anybody




VincentVanGauge said:
“Lord, give me patience NOW !”
cross
Senior Member

I Love Beef Curtains!
1072 Posts
6/05
Posted - Sep 8 2005 : 4:50AM
I don't think it's because the guy is going to blow his load. It's because watching a girl work cock with her tougne, lips and mouth while looking up into the camera POV style is fucking hot.
+1 for no hands
picman
Senior Member

Nothing says I love you so much as a tongue in the ass.
2884 Posts
1/03
Posted - Sep 8 2005 : 6:41AM
One aspect that I think needs mentioning is the hands behind the back variation which is a very submissive pose. Melissa Lauren has always been automatic at this. It gives the guy free rein to her mouth with no possibility of restraint. I know that for me, personally, that's a big turn on, and in real life, a show of trust.
Beavis69
Member

278 Posts
9/04
Posted - Sep 8 2005 : 7:35AM
I love the combo of hands and mouth also, good point about it being more true in real life. I always loved the way Amber Lynn(the alltime bj queen..in my opinion) worked a cock while looking up at her guy w/her beutiful eyes and nasty?hot look as only she could do ! Todays girls could...make that should watch some of her vid's and take a few notes !
BSD
Senior Member

San Diego, CA
2508 Posts
11/03
Posted - Sep 8 2005 : 12:36PM
Friends -

+1 MILLION for NO, (or minimal), hands during blow jobs.

When someone is using or supposed to be using their mouth on a dick that is a BLOW job.

When someone is using their hands on a dick, that is a HAND job.

I do not pay to see hand jobs. To me, too much hand action, even while the mouth is attached to the end of the dick is a lazy or unenthusiastic blow job, and really bugs me. I like to see a lot of enthusiastic mouth loving and or face fucking, without a lot of jerking and hand tugging.

Two of the worst practicioners of this too much hands stuff, are two porn angels that I otherwise love. Old pro Nina Hartley , who is notorious for controlling all aspects of the blow job, to the point where it looks like she's choreographing it, more than actually being involved in it, (Nina's also notorious for cum "aiming", if not outright cum-dodging), and one of my new favorite squeezes, Julia Bond who has ruined some beautiful images for me with her constant hands on dick when she should be sucking.

I get that girls get tired, or if she has a small mouth, having a big dick slammed in it can be a little much, and a little hand action breaks up the blow job and affords her a little relief. I'm alright with that. But for my tastes, the vast majority of the blow job should be "hands-free", and the imagery is much more erotic when it is just pretty face filled with cock.

BSD

Edited by - BSD on 9/8/2005 12:36:59 PM

Lazerus
Member

187 Posts
9/03
Posted - Sep 9 2005 : 2:25AM
I think this is a question that can tell you a lot about how different viewers like their porn these days. Generally speaking:

No Hands=Passive/Submissive

Hands=Active/Dominant

I like both, depending on the context and performers.

Porn today suffers from too much repetitious blow job filler with no point of view at all.

If you're serious about putting her hands behind her back, then tie them there . . . oops, never mind--I see the porn police coming . . .

What I'd really like to see more of is "no hands" by the men in the scenes. Now that would be innovation.

Slider
Member

110 Posts
7/04
Posted - Sep 12 2005 : 8:45AM
I love no-hands, but I also like certain kinds of hand-aided blowjobs. For me, it's not so much the use of hands, per se - it's whether they obstruct too much of the action or not.

For instance, when I'm watching a bj that's filmed from the side, I hate when the girl grabs/strokes the cock from the camera side - the near side. The width of her hand covers up a good amount of cock (especially if the guy is just average), and you lose some of the sheer piston-pumping aspect of it. If, however, she holds it delicately, loosely, from the other side, with only her fingertips showing as she strokes - that's hot. Or stroking with the fingertips along the underside half of his shaft... Somewhere there's gotta be uninterrupted cock all the way to the girl's mouth.

One man's opinion.

But I think the reason I like no-hands best is that it has to do with the perception that she is totally surrendering to the man and his tool - letting him treat her mouth like he'd treat her pussy or her asshole. Oh yes!! Just got wood!

- Slider

Edited by - Slider on 9/12/2005 8:46:33 AM

 
spitty
Member

730 Posts
12/04
Posted - Sep 12 2005 : 9:15AM
I prefer "no hands" ! I just want to see her mouth and tongue do the job. Also , when 2 girls are blowing the same cock with lots of spit , I hate it when they start stroking the dick with their hands to remove the spit. Leave it there so that they could share it.
Hardware All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

Your other left
14594 Posts
3/02
Posted - Sep 12 2005 : 11:34AM
On the other hand (hehe), I prefer the woman to be an active and equal participant. So, while I agree that no hands head makes a nice visual, I'm happy to see enthusiatic stroking included in BJ's as well.



Jump To: