Featured New Release
Box cover for Chloe Cherry Is Euphoric
Chloe Cherry Is Euphoric
Studio: Team Skeet
Release date: 7/28/2026


all new releases
All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 471 > No model release?
AuthorPost
Kensington Chapp
Senior Citizen

Mine is the biggest.
610 Posts
7/07
Posted - Jan 16 2008 : 2:44PM
We all know porn chicks sign releases for the scenes and photoshoots they do.
And dish out IDs etc for the whole USC 2257 crap.
Butt what about all these sites selling low picture quality, amateur home made porn? Do all the people involved in these (sometimes secretly filmed) videos sign releases?? Do they all give up copies of their IDs etc?

I had my fun and that's all that matters.

Jacco All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

"liable to deprave and corrupt"
2673 Posts
5/04
Posted - Jan 16 2008 : 5:42PM
You don't really believe in "secretly" filmed porn do you? And the whole paperwork is also the reason why "celebrities" protesting the release of their home porn movie are a joke.
Nothing (especially in the US) goes out without the paperwork.
Jacco
conquistador
Deactivated User

Hellhamster.
2947 Posts
10/03
Posted - Jan 16 2008 : 5:44PM
^^^
[url=455713]the upload screen at [link removed: No tube sites]
" Make this video available
Worldwide including the United States (radial button)
In all countries except the United States (radial button)
By making the video available in the United States, you agree to provide 2257 documentation upon request.
"
I didn't go farther into the process because I don't have any home made porn I want to share. They might enforce record keeping but from the looks of it you can upload what you like and you will have to provide ID upon request.
Edited by - conquistador on 1/16/2008 5:48:47 PM
Kensington Chapp
Senior Citizen

Mine is the biggest.
610 Posts
7/07
Posted - Jan 16 2008 : 6:11PM
Gentlemen, I'm talking about the likes of this.
Jacco, would everybody featured in these videos have provided releases and IDs?
I know what you're smoking about America paperwork jazz, I work for a US corporation and I need to file an application to take a whizz.

I had my fun and that's all that matters.

Jacco All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

"liable to deprave and corrupt"
2673 Posts
5/04
Posted - Jan 16 2008 : 8:22PM
That's just an affilate site for several amateur pornsites. If you click on them, you'll go to the real sites, and those have a 2257 link. Actually, you probably do not want to click on anything there without proper protection of your computer, there seems to be some shady sites in between.
Jacco
[I actually had to force my browser to close on one of them]
Edited by - jacco on 1/16/2008 8:27:44 PM
 
Everett
Senior Member

2088 Posts
6/05
Posted - Jan 16 2008 : 8:41PM
ask Joey Buttafuoco. I mean the press said he & wifey were unaware that Rob Spallone was filming them. I find that hard to believe yet the Buttafuocos haven't made a stink about being filmed and about Spallone peddling it. Buttafuoco & wife were probably privy all the while, it just makes good advertising for sales. But Spallone most likely got them to sign off on something.
xxaru
Member

128 Posts
6/07
Posted - Jan 16 2008 : 8:58PM
A release and 2257 compliance are kind of 2 different things. 2257 has more to do with age verification. A release is really just an agreement where the person waives their right to sue arising from certain activity. If you're just posting your private video up for a few friends to see, then you probably can get away without having a release. But, you could still be sued if someone in the vid felt there was an invasion of privacy, defamation, or violation of right to publicity. So if your using the vid for sale or advertising purposes without a release, you're asking for trouble. And if the person involved is doing anything sexual and they didn't consent to you posting the video (and they find out about it), they can definitely call for invasion of privacy and/or defamation.
Edited by - xxaru on 1/16/2008 8:59:42 PM
xxaru
Member

128 Posts
6/07
Posted - Jan 16 2008 : 9:00PM
BTW, I am not an attorney, so don't take what I say as professional legal advice.
Kensington Chapp
Senior Citizen

Mine is the biggest.
610 Posts
7/07
Posted - Jan 17 2008 : 3:13PM
I made an animated video of an ex friend being railed by an old man, to the beat of some bouncy bopper tune, posted it on youtube.
He called me up one day and just screamed at me to take it down.
Refer to my signature below for my feelings on the matter.
I had my fun and that's all that matters.
dead horse
Most Beaten Member

305 Posts
6/06
Posted - Jan 17 2008 : 3:34PM
did you take it down? Since it was animated, was it obvious it was him? could he prove you put it up? I think if it's meant to be funny there is some kind of satire protection?
pornlaw
Member

578 Posts
10/05
Posted - Jan 18 2008 : 4:06AM
Everyone has a right to privacy and publicity. In order to commercially profit on a video, barring newsworthy uses, most circumstances require a signed release.
No release = civil liability. Its called Civil Code section 3344 in California.
But it requires those being exploited to enforce their own rights.
There's a ton of vids on the net that could be the basis for legal action. But most dont either know they are posted some where or they choose not to go through the expense.
Michael
www.adultbizlaw.com
Kensington Chapp
Senior Citizen

Mine is the biggest.
610 Posts
7/07
Posted - Jan 18 2008 : 3:14PM
I had a photo of his head on a stickman body. It was as funny as hell.



Jump To: