New Pornstar Interviews - [more]
Little Puck Interview

"I’m a woman of varied tastes. I can get off to a lot of different things. I enjoy switching it up."
All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 420 > No subject
AuthorPost
sec
New Member

1 Posts
11/08
Posted - Nov 9 2008 : 1:15PM
[message edited away by the OP]
Edited by - sec on Mar 26 2009
Edited by - heynow on Mar 26 2009
Ramsey
Senior Member

Trina Michaels fan
10332 Posts
10/02
Posted - Nov 9 2008 : 1:29PM
You know they can spell a fatwa on you right? ;-)
You can put Rasheen Karim-Koram on your list and on the male side Zenza Raggi and Hakan.
Jameson2k4
Member

185 Posts
11/04
Posted - Nov 9 2008 : 1:42PM
You know that this request is kinda creepy do you ? Especially in combination with a Hotmail adress, if you ran a studio it might be different but why would a porn actress want to contact a stranger on the internet.
drdoom
Member

317 Posts
5/07
Posted - Nov 9 2008 : 6:01PM
Sahara Knight is Muslim. She is of Pakistani origin and fucking horny, hot and downright dirty!
Lovely Muslim chick...
I'd love to see HER do a Facial Abuse scene for sheezy!
sk.jpg
sk2.jpg
sk3.jpg

Aylar Lie/Diana might be Muslim too.

BlackSix All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

pornography wasn't sex but fantasies of an impossibly hospitable world
12377 Posts
9/07
Posted - Nov 9 2008 : 6:51PM
After Prop8 maybe we should have a Mormon-focused porn release. Start with Belladonna.
 
JohnW
Senior Member

1351 Posts
6/08
Posted - Nov 9 2008 : 6:55PM
Well, there are porn stars of arab, persian, pakistani or indian background. I figure that might be what you were wondering. Whether they consider themselves muslims is impossible to know.
killbillvol69 All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

^Lucy Pinder
18631 Posts
4/08
Posted - Nov 9 2008 : 7:28PM
There is actually a surprisingly large number of porn stars from Mormon families. I won't get into a list here, but it's BIG.
[edit: used "large" twice. It looked stupid.]
Edited by - killbillvol69 on 11/9/2008 7:29:11 PM
Shylock
Spieglergirls.com

"Patron of the Tarts"
2431 Posts
3/03
Posted - Nov 9 2008 : 9:27PM
RandomPrecision
Senior Member

Enjoy!
8175 Posts
3/06
Posted - Nov 10 2008 : 12:57AM
Indeed. I don't think you're likely to find too many "Muslim" porn stars. Arab? Maybe. Islam is a religion.
T0MBOne
Senior Member

1200 Posts
5/08
Posted - Nov 10 2008 : 10:28AM
I just watched a documentary called Debbie Does Dallas: Uncovered that has a bonus BBC documentary called Diary of a Porn Virgin, which features Sahara and a few others in the early stages of their xxx careers---T0M
Ramsey
Senior Member

Trina Michaels fan
10332 Posts
10/02
Posted - Nov 10 2008 : 1:17PM
Coolest name ever :-) Has he done any movies yet?
But he also could be a hindu, not a muslim.
aussie_guy77
Member

121 Posts
4/07
Posted - Nov 10 2008 : 11:41PM
I am thinking of Melody in the down the hatch 10.
Haze
Deactivated User

769 Posts
7/04
Posted - Nov 11 2008 : 12:37AM
Tory Lane is one I think.
Knuckle Kids
Deactivated User

287 Posts
4/08
Posted - Nov 11 2008 : 2:51PM
Wasn't there that one girl that did that one video about 5 years or so ago, can't remember her name or where she came from, but I think she was Muslim, or Buddhist, not really sure.
Ramsey
Senior Member

Trina Michaels fan
10332 Posts
10/02
Posted - Nov 14 2008 : 11:36AM
Jazmin was from Bangladesh but not sure if she was muslim or hindu.
 
Pentasa
Deactivated User

233 Posts
9/08
Posted - Nov 15 2008 : 7:44AM
I dunno if these girls are genuine Arabians pornstars,(let alone Muslims) but cover girl Kaila looks hot as hell! Arab Street Hookers is the series.
http://adultdvdbestdeal.com/cart/item/83865
Can someone tell me how to post full pictorials of DVD covers and pics of stars rather than web links please? Thanks..
Edited by - Pentasa on 11/15/2008 7:55:34 AM
blowfish
Member

874 Posts
1/08
Posted - Nov 15 2008 : 9:40AM
killbillvol69 All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

^Lucy Pinder
18631 Posts
4/08
Posted - Nov 15 2008 : 10:18AM
^Wow. That site doesn't seem like propaganda at all.[/sarcasm]
edit:
@Pentasa: when you're creating a message, there are buttons below the message, like "URL" (for making links) and "Upload Image" for posting images. Click on the buttons and follow the instructions.
BUT... Please read the image policy very carefully before posting any images. I can't say this strongly enough. Almost every user posts an image that is not allowed on their first try. NO images of sex acts (this includes masturbation). NO pussy or penis or pubic hair. NO pics that have a pussy or penis blurred/cropped out (if it wasn't ok before the blur/crop, it's not ok after). I stress this because if you screw up too much, then your ability to post images will be taken away. Got it?
Edited by - killbillvol69 on 11/15/2008 10:23:54 AM
blowfish
Member

874 Posts
1/08
Posted - Nov 15 2008 : 12:33PM
Propaganda? Ok, what is the proper way to execute a Muslim porn star?
killbillvol69 All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

^Lucy Pinder
18631 Posts
4/08
Posted - Nov 15 2008 : 2:50PM
^No, the site in general. Did you read the rest of the stuff on that site?
Not to mention the tone of the article itself.
Honestly, I wouldn't be surprised if the entire thing was made up, just to make Palestinians look bad. I'm not saying it didn't happen. I'm just saying that I'd prefer a more reputable source.
blowfish
Member

874 Posts
1/08
Posted - Nov 15 2008 : 3:20PM
CNN already pulled their version...
A couple others still online.
Times of India
LA Times
Notice the tone is not much different than the anti-Arab propaganda.
RFrog
Member

396 Posts
10/07
Posted - Nov 15 2008 : 3:49PM
I'm not touching this subject with a 10 foot dildo.
Forget I was ever here.
Pentasa
Deactivated User

233 Posts
9/08
Posted - Nov 15 2008 : 7:28PM
Thanks killbillvol69...
Edited by - Pentasa on 11/15/2008 7:52:09 PM
killbillvol69 All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

^Lucy Pinder
18631 Posts
4/08
Posted - Nov 15 2008 : 11:15PM
Thanks for the alternate sources. I think the tone was slightly different. Perhaps not radically so, but the emphasis was placed on a couple things that I feel were missed by the first article you posted.
1. This was not so much related to porn as it was related to any "straying" by a woman.
2. Social circumstances play into phenomena like "honour killings".
These two things were indeed missed by the first article, which basically said (and the comments posted most certainly backed it up, with enthusiasm) that Israeli Arabs (notice it refused to call them Palestinians, as Zionists refuse to acknowledge that Palestine ever existed) are monsters who are anti-porn.
[edit: wrote "phenomenon", when I should have written "phenomena", because it's plural.]
Edited by - killbillvol69 on 11/15/2008 11:15:59 PM
blowfish
Member

874 Posts
1/08
Posted - Nov 16 2008 : 6:55AM
An Arab woman beaten with in inches of her life. A life that would have been snuffed out if Israeli's authorities did not save her. She made a choice to do porn. I assume to feed her 8 children. Porn by all counts sold very well in the Arab community.
Why do we give arab Muslims a pass? A mob not only took the law into their own hands, they invented a crime. In no way was the woman's action a illegal. She was an Israeli on Israeli soil. Theoretically, the same thing could happen in America. I too want to see more real Arab in porn. Some how Latino's in veils and burkas don't cut it.
I agree honor killings are a product of social circumstances. Those circumstances being ignorance, intolerance, and lack of humanity. In no way can that animalistic behavior be justified.
 
killbillvol69 All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

^Lucy Pinder
18631 Posts
4/08
Posted - Nov 16 2008 : 1:37PM
^I'm not trying to justify it. Not by any means. This incident is horrific, and a damn shame.
But I'm also not trying to vilify an entire culture based on the actions of a certain few, which I feel the original article was trying to do. That was my only point.
blowfish
Member

874 Posts
1/08
Posted - Nov 16 2008 : 4:00PM
^^^What if she was attacked for cultural reasons?
killbillvol69 All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

^Lucy Pinder
18631 Posts
4/08
Posted - Nov 16 2008 : 6:16PM
^I don't understand what point you're trying to make.
blowfish
Member

874 Posts
1/08
Posted - Nov 16 2008 : 7:22PM
Ok, let me turn it around. You said the writer was vilifying an entire culture. What part of Arab/Islamic culture are defending in that first article?
killbillvol69 All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

^Lucy Pinder
18631 Posts
4/08
Posted - Nov 16 2008 : 7:45PM
^I'm not sure that I'm defending anyone/thing. I'm just trying NOT to say that because of this particular incident, all Arab Muslims are de facto evil monsters.
Are there evil monsters amongst Arab Muslims? Sure, why not.
Are there problems with Arab Muslim culture? Of course, like any culture.
Should this be justification for continued occupation of - and military aggression against - Palestine, as the original article almost went so far as suggesting (and the comments most certainly did suggest)? I don't think so.
blowfish
Member

874 Posts
1/08
Posted - Nov 16 2008 : 10:28PM
^^^You read way more into that article than the average learned person would. Of course, you can't hold the writer accountable for reader comments. Another issue - Arab Israelis are not Palestinians. The Israeli version posted said nothing about Palestine or Palestinians.
The assault occurred in Tira, which is not a Palestinian territory. A mostly Arab village but still falls under Knesset laws. The woman was Israeli therefore afforded rights as an Israeli citizen. Just like in America, religious law does not supersede the state.
killbillvol69 All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

^Lucy Pinder
18631 Posts
4/08
Posted - Nov 16 2008 : 11:46PM
Alright I'm basically done with this. But one final thing: the Israeli article from a clearly Zionist website couldn't have mentioned Palestine or Palestinians, because according to Zionists, there is not, nor has there ever been, a place called "Palestine". The word simply does not exist.
On the other hand, to Palestinians, there is no such thing as an "Arab Israeli" - there are only Palestinians living within Israeli-occupied territories.
Knuckle Kids
Deactivated User

287 Posts
4/08
Posted - Nov 17 2008 : 12:32AM
I guess this just settles arguements on two things:
1. Porn hurts women
2. Women entering porn are already on drugs. They don't start doing drugs after they enter porn.
blowfish
Member

874 Posts
1/08
Posted - Nov 17 2008 : 5:51AM
Just so I know where you are coming from? Humor me with one more time... Does Israel as a country have a right to exist?
killbillvol69 All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

^Lucy Pinder
18631 Posts
4/08
Posted - Nov 17 2008 : 10:42AM
^Too difficult a question for me to answer.
The whole "land without a people for a people without a land" claim was clearly BS to start with, because there were people there. That's the problem. They're still there. And they refer to themselves as Palestinians, because the place where they lived prior to 1948 was called Palestine.
But at the same time, what can you do now? You can't "kick out" people that you feel shouldn't have moved there, because now they're there.
Does Israel, as a country, have a right to exist? I guess I'd have to say they have no more or less right to exist than the US, Canada, any country in Central/South America and the Caribbean, Japan, Australia, New Zealand, and any other country that was founded by settlers. Which is to say, yes and no.
What I can say is that it's likely that the current Israel/Palestine situation could be vastly improved. And not by war.
 
loop
Senior Member

1409 Posts
9/03
Posted - Nov 17 2008 : 12:14PM
just to clarify things -
this sentence is 100% not true. i don't know where u got the meaning of the word "zionist".
i consider myself as an israeli zionist and so does like 95% of israleli jews no matter what their politic views (both right and left). also , more than 2/3 of israelis do believe in a two state solution both israel and palestine (of course only if there's gonna be real peace with security and zero terror and not just "on the paper" kind of peace).
being a zionist meaning that u support israel as the only state to all jews around the world - those who wish to live here (and we have only one state unlike other nations). it doesn't refer to more or less territories - u can be a zionist wanting all palestine as an israeli territory or be one supporting palestine in 1967 borders.
Edited by - loop on 11/17/2008 12:15:48 PM
killbillvol69 All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

^Lucy Pinder
18631 Posts
4/08
Posted - Nov 17 2008 : 3:23PM
^Hmm. I apologize if my use of the term "Zionist" was too broad. It seems that the term simply means those who desire a Jewish state.
However, in the common context of today, both among Jews and non-Jews, among Zionists and anti-Zionists, the term is almost never separated from those who believe that the Jewish state should be located in what is referred to today as Israel, and possibly including what is referred to as Palestine as well. It was not always this way, of course. In the early part of the 20th century there were even suggestions that an Israeli state should be established in Uganda.
But anyway, I'm not trying to educate you on the history of Israel, or what is a Zionist. What I wanted to say is that I have been given the impression, by Jews who consider themselves to be Zionists as well as Jews who consider themselves to be anti-Zionists (though none of whom live in Israel), that the whole reason that the geographical area which is today called Israel was chosen as the potential place for a Jewish state was because it was considered to be a place which did not have a population that belonged there. In other words, that there was no such thing as "Palestine" prior to 1948.
Thus, the use of the term "Palestinian" is almost completely not in existence in websites such as this (the original website I was referencing in my quote above). And if the term is used, it is only used in the context of referring to those who live within the post-1967 borders of "Palestine", as opposed to the Palestinians who live within the post-1967 borders of Israel, who are referred to as "Arab Israelis" - the implication being that prior to 1948, the Arabs in the area did not belong to a particular, distinct people of their own, and thus the only identification an Arab living inside the 1948 AND 1967 borders could have is an "Arab Israeli", while that Arab would quite likely refer to themselves as "Palestinian".
Perhaps there is another term that I - and others - should be using here. Maybe a modification of the term "Zionist" (like "anti-Palestinian Zionist"), or maybe a term without "Zionist" in it at all. But nonetheless there is a segment of the population within the Zionist movement, both in Israel and living abroad, who claim that no such place as "Palestine" existed prior to 1948. Some of these people may very well be in favour of the 1967 borders, or a two-state solution, but only acknowledge "Palestine" as a recent creation, as opposed to something that existed prior to the creation of the state of Israel.
I don't want to imply any wrongdoing on the part of those who desire a state of Israel (Zionists). That is neither my belief, nor would it be my place to pass judgment upon if it was. I do however see a certain portion of the Jewish population who claim to fall under the "Zionist" banner who refuse to acknowledge certain historical truths, and that, to me, is problematic.
I do, most importantly though, want to acknowledge that I recognize the error of my phrasing in using the term "Zionist" to refer to individuals for whom I should have used a different, more precise term. And I'm sorry for that.
blowfish
Member

874 Posts
1/08
Posted - Nov 17 2008 : 7:02PM
Thanks for answering.
TeganLuv27
Deactivated User

23 Posts
11/08
Posted - Nov 17 2008 : 10:13PM
If youre looking to recruit muslim pornstars try your local 7/11.



Jump To: