Reviewers Recommend So Extra - review by Sean DPS Director: Mike Quasar Starring: Tommy Pistol, Ryan Keely, Seth Gamble, Isiah Maxwell, Robby Apples, Kay Lovely, Melissa Stratton, Chanel Camryn. Read review
This is a celebration of the stars who aren't "classically beautiful according to current, predominant cultural norms", but are still capable of "rocking your world" and "blowing your mind"! The unfortunatley named Veruca James. Zoe Adrianna Chechik Casey Cumz Edited by - indisposed on Feb 5 2014 Edited by - indisposed on Mar 8 2014
Are you kidding man? Zoe Voss was a model prior of entering in porn and is outright beautiful and one of my favourite ever. Riley Reid , well I don't even know where to begin to say how beautiful she is , in addition is an outstanding performer. Veruca is a mistery I admit I overlooked her but many are praising her I have to give her some chances, I can just say she's one of the VERY few whose tattoos I like , a lot. About Adriana Chechick ,her body is flawless , so I can't really call them "oddly" attractive , they are attractive in many ways and on many levels Edited by - LCF on 2/5/2014 6:20:21 PM
I agree...you don't get to be a pornstar by being ugly. What may not be attractive to you is attractive to another. Nothing odd about it at all. The women you stated were "oddly bequtiful" are not so much to me...they are very attractive, highly erotic and are well known now for causing cocks to stiffen around the world. There is a body type for everyone. The women I stroke off to while watching their scenes may not arouse another person as much.
I haven't said that they are ugly or unattractive. In fact they are very attractive. However, they wouldn't be called beautiful in the classical sense.
[Link]
Superdeluxe Deactivated User
211 Posts 1/14
Posted - Feb 5 2014 : 9:35PM
If you could talk the average woman into porn style makeup, you would have a nation full of oddly attractive women. It's what they do and how they do it on screen that makes them a star!
[Link]
rtj2v0a Self-removed
Sports is to war as pornography is to sex. ― Jonathan Haidt 222 Posts 10/13
Posted - Mar 8 2014 : 12:21PM
There is a reason for the old saying "beauty is in the eye of the beholder." Classical beauty does... not... exist. Edited by - rtj2v0a on 3/8/2014 12:22:27 PM
i happen to disagree with all your choices especially riley and veruca. i think they are both gorgeous. the others I am not too familiar with but i think you can find unflattering pics of anybody. perhaps you can give us a few examples of performers you think are beautiful or beautiful in the classic sense. whatever that means.
Well, I'd probably define classical beauty in the broad sense of well defined features, symmetrical etc. in the vein of Vivan Leigh, Katherine Hepburn, Garbo, Kelly etc. Some I think would match up. Faith Leon Hayden Winters Jenni Lee Malena Morgan A couple of ladies who probably wouldn't qualify, but sets the heart aflutter and the old secretory organs aquiver. Lily Labeau Mia Rose Hope that helps...... muddy the waters.
[Link]
rtj2v0a Self-removed
Sports is to war as pornography is to sex. ― Jonathan Haidt 222 Posts 10/13
Posted - Mar 8 2014 : 6:02PM
Nothing personal, but if you are saying the definition of "classical beauty" is all white, all the time, I will stick to my original point. There is no such thing as classical beauty.
I nominate Belladonna. She's certainly not ugly or anything like that but I also wouldn't put her in a top 10 of hottest porn stars or anything like that either. And with that said, she gets me off more than any other porn star.
[Link]
La Lunitica Deactivated User
Zenogias 181 Posts 6/13
Posted - Mar 8 2014 : 6:52PM
I think your definition is more along the lines of women who don't look like Victoria's Secret Supermodels.
[/quote] Nothing personal, but if you are saying the definition of "classical beauty" is all white, all the time, I will stick to my original point. There is no such thing as classical beauty. [/quote] Unfortunately, most of today's definitions of beauty are the remnants of western cultural definitions. Which you have to admit, with the wide reach of the "western" media has become the most prevalent "cultural norm". These are however changing slowly with the rather slow influx of non white actresses into the mainstream. But if you do look at Hollywood, TV, glamour & women's magazines and even porn, there is still a significant ethnically "white" bias. Though I admit this is changing and will hopefully change completely in the next 10 to 20 years. Until then most beautiful non-white women will most likely be considered "exotic". Anyway, this is just my humble opinion. And to head anybody about to accuse me of racism off at the pass, I'm not white. Edited by - indisposed on 3/8/2014 7:13:45 PM
i see what you are getting at now. you are setting the bar pretty high though. you are eliminating like 99% of women and calling the rest oddly attractive. everyone has a type and you are entitled to yours but i wouldn't classify any of those women as oddly attractive b.c there is nothing odd about being attracted to those women. there are many women that fall short of grace kelly but are still attractive. and when you say oddly it is like you are saying there is no reason to be attracted to them yet you are for some reason. i will give the benefit of the doubt and assume your intentions were pure but i think this thread is not going to be a celebration. you must realize how those women could get offended by this.
[Link]
rtj2v0a Self-removed
Sports is to war as pornography is to sex. ― Jonathan Haidt 222 Posts 10/13
Posted - Mar 8 2014 : 8:05PM
Nothing personal, but if you are saying the definition of "classical beauty" is all white, all the time, I will stick to my original point. There is no such thing as classical beauty.
Click to expand
Unfortunately, most of today's definitions of beauty are the remnants of western cultural definitions. Which you have to admit, with the wide reach of the "western" media has become the most prevalent "cultural norm". These are however changing slowly with the rather slow influx of non white actresses into the mainstream. But if you do look at Hollywood, TV, glamour & women's magazines and even porn, there is still a significant ethnically "white" bias. Though I admit this is changing and will hopefully change completely in the next 10 to 20 years. Until then most beautiful non-white women will most likely be considered "exotic". Anyway, this is just my humble opinion. And to head anybody about to accuse me of racism off at the pass, I'm not white. Edited by - indisposed on 3/8/2014 7:13:45 PM
Click to expand
No, I know full well that's what the so-called "norm" is purported to be, but I don't -- and never have --accepted it. And while you may not be a racist, continuing to perpetuate what is essentially a racist standard is just as bad. You may continue to be part of the problem, to exhibit lazy thinking, or you can be part of the solution and reject it.
Maybe I should edit it to "classically beautiful according to current, predominant cultural norms", quit the mouthful. But as long as it toes the PC line.
[Link]
rtj2v0a Self-removed
Sports is to war as pornography is to sex. ― Jonathan Haidt 222 Posts 10/13
Posted - Mar 8 2014 : 9:37PM
Is it really that hard to drop a cultural standard that doesn't work? What's "PC" about looking at the beauty of all women, instead of "predominant, normal, acceptable" beauty and "other" beauty? Basically, you'd saying the same thing, just badly.
Now that we have discussed the kind of woman that this thread is NOT about, can we get back to the women who won't appear on the cover of "Vogue", "Victoria's Secret" or "Sports Illustrated"? If it's not too much trouble?
Mia Rose