Reviewers Recommend
Hole Snack, AHole Snack, A - review by fu_q
Starring: Scott Nails, Ryan Reid. Read review
All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 556 > Ok, this may seem a stupid question, but
AuthorPost
Funky monkey man
Member

6 Posts
8/06
Posted - Aug 23 2006 : 12:59PM
why have sites such as platinum x and redlight changed their trailers from hard-core to soft-core?

Seriously, wtf?

They make hard-core films. Celebrate that!

(Sorry if this has already been addressed. I haven't been on here in months. Came as a real shock. *tear*)

pinc_noiz
Deactivated User

758 Posts
6/05
Posted - Aug 23 2006 : 1:07PM
[invalid URL removed]past thread
Funky monkey man
Member

6 Posts
8/06
Posted - Aug 23 2006 : 1:22PM
Shame. Kids, like it or not, can get just about anything on the net. Sites such as platinum and redlight are not exclusive to the rest of the net.
zorge
Member

278 Posts
8/06
Posted - Aug 23 2006 : 2:53PM
(This rant probably only loosely connects to the thread, so bump it out if you think it's not appropriate here )

I'm reminded that I found porn when I was a teen (and I'm sure many here did as well), and I didn't have internet (there's just only so many places you can hide things in a house). But it also didn't make me go crazy or become a social deviant, it was probably helpful actually to confirm that the desires I was already having weren't actually abnormal. (far better than the religious repression foisted on kids that tells them they may be racking up eternal punishment for their thoughts.) Which is part of why I find all this talk in society about "the children" to be so stupid... (and why the PR about "online predators," while sounding well intentioned, actually comes across to me as having very little to do with "protecting kids" and a lot more to do with giving govt. and business more control over how you use the internet.)
When kids go through puberty they start to think about sex, that's pretty undeniable. I'm not saying that means they should be "legal" at that age by any means, but they're going to think about it and we should just admit that, we've all been there. This has virtually nothing to do with pornography if you ask me.
Part of the whole "morality war" going on seems aimed at re-instilling some sort of early idea of sexual control (as associated with early American Protestantism, govt. control under the notion of "self control", and to tame the "dangerous" notions of sexual desire as playful, meant for enjoyment, creative... and instead as something to be hidden and only for certain uses... the war on homosexuality fits with this too). In a broad context, it fits with other discourses in our society to deny our nature as sexual beings (which has political purposes, right?)... And these backlashes have been going on for many decades. One can sociologize and theorize as to why this happens, and there's no single reason... perhaps we'd be a better citizenry if we were universally uptight, repressed and neurotic???

Anyhow, I'm done ranting. Call me a skeptic.

Edited by - zorge on 8/23/2006 2:54:10 PM

Edited by - zorge on 8/23/2006 2:55:25 PM

duffy
Deactivated User

208 Posts
4/06
Posted - Aug 23 2006 : 3:10PM
People who are well adjusted sexually are not addicted to porn.



Jump To: