Re; Tommy Byron. No doubt the Dems were to blame that he had to sully himself doing Uber driving, he manages some VapeShop grocery store now and prolly prostrates himself before Prez Drumpf thinking he personally got him upgrade in his job prospects. I found Byron VERY active on Insta. He broke the news about Jeanna Fine's untimely death there last year.
I unfollowed him though, cannot share any kind of his rah-rah political sensibilties - though not saying he's "wrong". Just depressed me with his witless AI generated bilge the kind the oh so busy Prez also shitposts daily.
Edit to say, the guy in my avatar, Shaun Costello a big director and male star from 1972 onwards did Uber driving too before he died in 2023, so it's a thing apparently. Costello was massively anti Trump though.
Edited by - Helmuth Richler on 1/25/2026 9:43:32 AM
I'm always surprised to read that a porn star supports the current Republican Party regime. Honestly, I think that anyone who isn't a billionaire or a white Christian evangelical who supports the current Republican Party is either delusional or downright stupid. For porn stars, the disconnect is stark. Project 2025 is the Republican playbook and while they haven't done a lot on the anti-porn stuff now, Project 2025 has the aim of criminalizing porn and the people who make it. Would Byron be at risk now? I don't know, but I since the Republicans have no problem with their gestapo shooting and killing citizens exercising the right to peaceful protest or "capturing" a five-year-old boy, then if I was Byron, it wouldn't be a gamble I'd be willing to make.
I know I shouldn't go too deep into politics on a porn forum, but I think that people blaming Trump are missing the bigger picture. This is the Republican Party. All of them. Every single one of them. If someone remains a member of that party as the party descends deeper and deeper into racism, fascism, misogyny, anti-gay hatred, and just general hatred of anyone they deem to be "them," then that person doesn't get to say that they remain a party member even though they don't support the current policies. It would be like someone in Nazi Germany in 1942 who was a member of the Nazi Party because they like the spiffy uniforms and precision marching. No, you're all in or all out. Conservativism used to be principled, and maybe it still is, but the principles have changed.
Last point, while I have been anti-Republican for a while now, and it's not really meaningful anyway since I'm not an American nor do I live is the US, the Dear Leader said something a few days ago that really sharpened my focus. Saying that NATO military personnel stayed in safe positions in the Afghanistan War isn't just a lie, it's offensive. Deeply offensive. I'm a veteran and while Afghanistan wasn't "my" war, I know many people who served there. Some were injured and some lost colleagues. Canada had losses proportional to the US given that we're about 10% of your population. I've read that the Danes, who have been deemed an enemy now by the Republican Party, had proportional losses beyond those suffered by the US.
Here is something that I can say with 100% certainty to the Dear Leader and his sycophants: no one who served in Afghanistan got a deferment.
From what I read back then, Byron didn't blame political crap he blamed piracy for his failling business so I wouldn't gloat too much about his predicament if part of the aim of this site is to support creators and denounce piracy and the things that caused the downfall.
^ Fair, but that still doesn't excuse him aligning with racists, fascists, misogynists, etc. I'd have a lot of sympathy for him for what piracy did to him if he wasn't aligned with those people.
^ Nothing wrong with earning an honest living as an Uber driver. I'm not assuming that porn performers accumulate massive fortunes - especially during his era.
^ I agree. Given Tom's career as a performer, director, and producer, I'd have guessed that he was reasonably well off. If he says that piracy killed his income, I assume those are royalties that have dried up. If so, then maybe he didn't save money from the outset on the expectation that royalties would continue forever. If that was his assumption, that's flawed. While I love Tom's movies and bought tons of them (I suspect he could have purchased a car just from the royalties attributable to me), a young porn collector likely has never heard of Tom nor has any interest in his movies.
Hateful politics aside, I hope he's doing well.
Can you imagine getting an Uber at LAX and your driver is Tom Byron? I'd offer to buy him lunch just to sit and talk with him about his porn days. Lunch and dinner, probably. I'm sure he has some great stories.
[mod edit: comment/link removed. From the ADT forum etiquette: "No topics about prostitution or escorts. Due to the passage of FOSTA/SESTA Adult DVD Talk cannot allow any topics, private messages, posts or Tweets that promote or facilitate the prostitution of another person. This means you can't talk about which porn stars might be escorts and where you can find them to engage their services. We don't have the luxury of giving out warnings. We'll delete the post or topic and likely ban your account immediately."]
^ Not to go too far off-topic, RearAdmiral - but do adult performers / crew get royalties? I would have thought it would be a one off payment per scene and that's it.
^ You're right, performers are paid a rate and don't get royalties. I forgot that. I assume that as producer/director that Byron would have been eligible for royalties, but like others, he may have sold those rights thinking that the up-front cash was better than the royalties. It would be a tough call to make that decision. Porn gets stale dated. Sure there is a market for 'classics,' but even that is small. How many downloads of "Insatiable" would VOD sites sell in a year? Probably not many. Buying or selling royalties would be a tug of war. The buyer wouldn't want to overpay knowing that the "value" of the movies is declining, and the seller would need to carefully balance a one-time payment against diminishing royalties.
I may be a bit biased when talking about Byron's movies though as I think they stand out from so much of the cookie-cutter stuff of the era. I still watch them, and watch them often.