Genitalia is a category that not many people can improve on, and as long as the guys keep getting it up, and off, then they'll be around, 'til younger guys cum along.
---BIGmike, over and out!---
[Link]
Little Puck Interview| Author | Post |
|---|---|
| FastForward Member 60 Posts 1/03 |  Posted - Jan 29 2003 : 8:35PM... is having some kind of standard for the guys in it. Not saying everyone needs to look like Nacho, but they don't have to be butt-ugly either! There are so many craggy faces, sloppy bellies and below-average genitalia, it almost makes it seem that loserdom is a job requirement. Most guys DO NOT look homeless, and a lot of them can see their dick over their belly too. Wouldn't hurt porn to find a few of them. [Link] |
| BIGmike B-I-G-m-i-k-e 2335 Posts 3/01 | Posted - Jan 29 2003 : 8:59PM Genitalia is a category that not many people can improve on, and as long as the guys keep getting it up, and off, then they'll be around, 'til younger guys cum along. ---BIGmike, over and out!--- [Link] |
| dumblonde Senior Member 2352 Posts 7/00 | Posted - Jan 29 2003 : 10:20PM A little downsizing in the dick dept. wouldn't hurt, and would allow an influx of better looking guys, but I think we're probably in the minority on this issue. Porn seems to hire the same few guys who can deliver the wood, and that's all many people wanna see. [Link] |
| Pontus Maximus Senior Member Man of Steel, meet your match. 1346 Posts 9/02 | Posted - Jan 29 2003 : 11:27PM Pontus [Link] |
| Ishamael1 Member New Zealand 81 Posts 12/02 | Posted - Jan 29 2003 : 11:32PM 1) Many consumers like to see the girls stretched, particularly in Gonzo, downsizing probably wouldn't hurt in couples flicks and the milder features, but it would take some enjoyment out for the more hardcore fans. 2) Theres a practical reason!! Theres got to be enough room to get a camera in there AND still screw the gals, so big dicks really are a bit of a requirement in that aspect. [Link] |
| blklthrjkt Passionfruit Video Dallas 105 Posts 7/02 | Posted - Jan 30 2003 : 9:05AM
[Link] |
| Gabriel Nine Senior Member Firecracker 1273 Posts 8/01 | Posted - Jan 30 2003 : 9:19AM I just received a copy of Assault that Ass #2, and obviously I'd paid more attention to the girls when I chose it. On looking at the geezers on the cast list, I hardly felt like opening the wrapper. (As an aside, why are RLD's discs always sealed on the side so the cellophane wrapper sticks to the box? That's really annoying.) [Link] |
| lou sapphire Member Take the plan, spin it sideways. 685 Posts 9/02 | Posted - Jan 30 2003 : 1:55PM yeah better looking guys would definatly help lure the females in our lifes into enjoying porn more. why alienate a potential audience? [Link] |
| FastForward Member 60 Posts 1/03 | Posted - Jan 30 2003 : 8:36PM [Link] |
| futureofporn Member 658 Posts 1/03 | Posted - Jan 30 2003 : 9:31PM [Link] |
| SueR Member Under a hill of books 262 Posts 12/02 | Posted - Jan 30 2003 : 11:18PM THERE IS NO STANDARD FOR GOOD LOOKING GUYS. Right at this moment, there is another thread going about the pretty boys of (straight) porn. I myself have asked posters to explain what they individually think is hot in a guy's physical characteristics, but got little response. I'll try it again now (see Polls). There are a lot of straight porn guys, and I challenge anyone to give me a reasonable description of physical "hotness" that I cannot find a suitable match for. I've seen guys in porn that look like doppelgangers of "hottie" celebrities like Tom Cruise and Andy Garcia. I, who pays less attention to "hotness" and more attention to sexual performance, cock girth and cumshot explosiveness, find myself taking note of the "prettiness" of guys like Frank Gunn, Lex, Julian, Brian Pumper, Omar, and (not a suckup) Jules Jordan. I think our thinking about this topic would be more fruitful if we asked "What straight porn guy do you think is hot?" [Link] |
| Ishamael1 Member New Zealand 81 Posts 12/02 | Posted - Jan 30 2003 : 11:36PM [Link] |
| Walter Burns Legendary Quoter IAFD, supporters of beastiality. Just say no. 7564 Posts 11/02 | Posted - Jan 31 2003 : 9:38AM [Link] |
| lou sapphire Member Take the plan, spin it sideways. 685 Posts 9/02 | Posted - Jan 31 2003 : 9:51AM although most of us know the difference between a troll and a prince. let me flip the standard question slightly. is there a standard for good looking girls in porn? [Link] |
| FastForward Member 60 Posts 1/03 | Posted - Jan 31 2003 : 6:42PM That's not unreasonable for girls, and it shouldn't be for guys either. OK, does it matter whether the guy looks like Nacho? Or Mike South? Maybe, but what matters A LOT MORE is that he not look like he smells bad.
Edited by - FastForward on 1/31/2003 7:23:30 PM [Link] |
| lindi Senior Member 12345 3205 Posts 9/02 | Posted - Mar 7 2003 : 4:00PM [Link] |
| Use the code below to link to this topic or a specific post. |
| URL of this thread |
| Link to this post with HTML |
| Link to this post with Forum Code |