In sort of a companion to the "RLD/Platinum X DVD Problems" thread, I'd like to point out that I've been noticing picture quality issues on other companies DVDs recently.
There seem to be three main issues:
(1) Video that never seems to be in focus. It's watchable, and typically better than VHS, but it is noticeably inferior to what we have come to expect on porn DVDs.
(2) A "blurred halo" effect. There is a blurred halo around performers and some sets/scenery items.
This is particularly annoying when it's noticeable around cocks and faces during cumshot sequences.
I think this is different than the colored halo issues being discussed in the RLD thread (but it could be due to related equipment and authoring issues).
Which leads to...
(3) Blurred video during performer's quicker movements. Again, particularly annoying during cumshot sequences!
For any of you who have experimented with variable bit rate (VBR) vs. constant bit rate (CBR) in capturing and editing your own digital videos, this looks a lot like the "pixel-box blurriness" you get with VBR and lower bit rates when video action first starts to move quickly
following relatively slow or stationary scene movement.
I most recently noticed these complaints on my original DVDs of "Deep Throat This" #14 and #15.
These are noticeably inferior to the quality I've come to expect from Peter North's DVDs!
Do we have a significant bootleg problem now with DVDs?
I'm wondering if the problems I'm noticing might be with distributors selling duplicated DVDs using compression schemes (like the 321 software)?
I checked through my "Peter North" DVDs (God knows which studio or production company each belongs to... LOL) and found all DVDs I checked to be single-layer UDF file formats with about 4 GB on a disk
(Contrast this with my Evil Angel and RLD DVDs I checked which were double-layer "unknown" file formats with about 8 GB on a disk).
It very well could be that Peter's DVDs have always been of lesser quality (bit-rate, etc.) in order to squeeze them onto a cheaper single-layer disk?
Maybe Peter's experimenting with VBR solutions to maximize content on a single-layer disk (instead of popping for dual-layer media)?
Or, Peter might have a serious bootleg distribution problem?
Any one have any insights?
[Link]