States and municipalities have laws banning specific acts. IIRC, an obscenity law has to be built on a foundation of a violation of a state or local statute, ie the law says no fisting in videos, and the video in question has fisting in it. A quick internet search will yeild a weath of state and local laws that are perverse in the specifitity of the acts banned from being depicted in films/videos.
Whether or not the state or local statute is a constitutional restriction of speach hinges on Miller. If the fisting depiction is defensible (as decided by a jury) under any one of the three prongs of the Miller test, the suppression of the depiction is deamed unconstitution under the First Ammendment.
If the depiction cannot be defended by any one of the three Miller tests, then it is deemed to be "obscenity" which according to Supreme Court presedent is not speach protected by the First Ammendment.
I don't think semantics is the same thing a complex legal issues.
At any rate, I believe that idea "obscenity" inconsistant with America's core values, and will ultimately prove to be an untenable legal concept, but in the meanwhile, Miller provide a fantastically large umbrella of protection. If you and I did a fisting film Kami, I can guarentuckenty that it would find sanctuary in Miller.
I'm saying the person wants to know can they get fisting with a democrat in office
the answer is no
It's great we all need to understand what the legal points are but the poster just wants to know can I get me some fisting vids soon. why make them wade through all that
If you have a DVD burner on your computer and a fast internet connection, you could make your own. They have a certain amount of self-fisting and lesbian fisting videos on Hungarian websites by DDF productions and 21Sextury. 21st Sextury has a website devoted to the subject, I believe. Teach Me Fisting, I believe it is called.
As some who was making and selling dirty pictures both before and after the last time a democrat held the office of president, I don't think the answer is as clear cut as a simple "no".
You would not believe the (self-imposed under fear of proscecution) restrictions that magazines worked under. I wish I still had the old guideline sheets, because they'd look unbelievably quaint by today's standards.
When Clinton came to office, it was the stated policy of his justice department to table obscenity (ie consenting adults) proscecutions, and focus on the explotation of children. IIRC there were zero obscenity prosecutions during Clintons two terms, and if you look at magazines publish in 1997 vs 1987 you can clearly see the difference Clinton's policies had on what sorts of images where published.
[Link]
DzaR Deactivated User
Deep Within The Consciousness Of My Own Mind 64 Posts 9/06
Posted - Oct 5 2006 : 1:44PM
Thankyou, Gentleman Jon!
I shall definitely have a look at those sites.
I have a dvd burner, but unfortunately I only have a dial-up telephone connection (56kbps). I am going to upgrade to a faster connection sometime in the near future.
Fortunately, a friend of mine has a higher-speed connection, and is happy to download vids on my behalf.
Excellent. Thanks again, Gentleman Jon.
http://www.freewebs.com/davidjburrell
[Link]
Eric381 Deactivated User
What are you looking at? It 2452 Posts 3/05
Posted - Oct 5 2006 : 5:40PM
I concur...and I think Leyden can 3rd that!Tony, I got lost in all this. Not really viewing material at that age in my life, by what you're saying, which were stronger in terms of sexual nature / obsenity ('87 or '97)?Edited by - Eric381 on 10/5/2006 5:45:23 PM
Well this brings up one of the most bizzarre aspects of the entire concept of obscenity.
Obscenity, at least as a form of speech that is denied constitutional protection, is only speech pertaining to what happens between our legs. Violence, no matter how graphic, can never be considered obscenity, so long as it does not involve cocks, pussies, or assholes.
This is all part of an absolutely bizarre doctrine that holds that the state has some special claim on our genitals that they don't have on the rest of bodies, and some special claim on our minds, when we are thinking about sex, that they don't have when we think about anything else.
It's an absolutely medieval attititude that I regard as one of the last vestiges of monarchal rule by divine right, ie the state, in the form of the king, is granted, by God, ultimate dominion over it's citizens. We fought a war over this, yet the stink of this notion that the state owns your sexuality still lingers. It's a notion about the relationship of the individual and the state that is perverse and antithetical to our most deeply cheerished ideas about liberty. Yet it persists.
Don't forget that obscenity isn't necessarily a federal crime. Obscenity can be prosecuted at a local level as well...and usually is.
Just changing the party in control of the White House and Congress won't eliminate attempted censorship. A change also needs to take place in local elections.
That's why, regardless of whether the largest candidate that you are supporting is a shoe in, has no chance or will be in a tightly contested race, it's important to show up and vote for candidates in the smaller elections as well. Probably even more important.
[Link]
Eric381 Deactivated User
What are you looking at? It 2452 Posts 3/05
Posted - Oct 6 2006 : 1:55AM
I wish he & all his religious right-wing cronies never became anything more than a dribble down their mama's leg.
Tony, that sounded excellent, like something I read out of Camelot. But nonetheless, excellent...after I read it the 3rd time.
'bout the only top flight fisting I ever saw was that gorgeous Czech, Meridian, doing sweet Danielle Rush in her ass by paw a couple of times. Very, very fine piece of cinema, that.
Watch [invalid URL removed]Meridian's German movies! I think there's a wrong image of Meridian at egafd.com [invalid URL removed]Meridian at eurobabeindex.com You will find her assfisting Daniella Rush in[invalid URL removed] Die Spermaklinik (german) for example There are a few more fisting titles with Daniella Rush from Videorama and DBM. [invalid URL removed]B.B. Nass Und Geil from DBM At lovelot.com you will find [invalid URL removed]DBM Classics Tornado - Versauter Engel with Meridiantwo titles for the price of one ! Here is a [invalid URL removed]Review of Schlampen mit der Faust gefickt! I have googled some images: http://fetishfilms.ru/schlamp.htm Twizted, info enough ?
BTW, Kelly Wells takes a fist in her ass euro style at [invalid URL removed]Casa Max Take a look at the Euro trailer of Universal Max 8 !
Edited by - gapelover on 10/12/2006 11:18:51 AM
[Link]
Ben Sanderson Deactivated User
32 Posts 10/06
Posted - Oct 13 2006 : 10:57AM
Is that the much talked about scene that was filmed at the AVN Convention last January?
I remember both Max and his cameraman said that is one of his most brutal scenes ever.
For the original poster, I don't think it will matter much if the democrats "win" the next election (2006), because in that scenario, while they would take over the house and the senate, the justice department (the agency that files these obscenity complaints on the federal level) will still have key appointments from the current president George Bush. If a democrat wins the presidency in 2008 then this may change (probabaly not if Hillary get's elected...lol)