Featured New Release
Box cover for Real. Hot. Wives.
Real. Hot. Wives.
Studio: Wifey.com
Release date: 7/27/2026


all new releases
All Forums > Tech Talk > Tech Talk Forum Page 36 > Plasma vs LCD vs Rear Projection > Plasma vs LCD vs Rear Projection (page 2)
Page 2 of 2 First
AuthorPost
Bob All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

5516 Posts
3/03
Posted - Jan 1 2007 : 12:17PM
Thanks, Bill! Thanks, pinc_noiz!
pinc_noiz
Deactivated User

758 Posts
6/05
Posted - Jan 3 2007 : 6:33AM
FYI, from a mail-conversation I had with NeoDigits/Oppo manufacturer Winbase Electronics, concerning both Oppo DV-981HD and Helios H-4000:

"Production models can play PAL DVD titles in native PAL High Definition video mode (720P/1080i @ 50 Hz) as well as native NTSC High Definition video mode (720P/1080i @ 60 Hz); they will be able to play PAL DVD titles with NTSC HD TVs in NTSC HD resolution."


p_n

Bob All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

5516 Posts
3/03
Posted - Jan 3 2007 : 1:32PM
How would you distinguish between these two DVD players? In your mind, are they essentially the same or is there a clear choice between them?

pinc_noiz
Deactivated User

758 Posts
6/05
Posted - Jan 4 2007 : 3:35AM
First of: I did not compare the DV-981HD and the H-4000. My educated guess is (based on the general picture/sound-characters of both individual brands/ specific and general manufacturers info) the Oppo is gearing towards playback-quality, the Helios towards playback-flexibility. Knowing what these players have in common though, the differences will not be very marked under day-to-day circumstances.

So far, it's seldom seeing a product doing everything well. Mostly it's build around (commercial) trade-offs/ compromises. In this case, the difficulty for the design teams most possibly was to make the electronics deal with as many playback-formats as possible, with as high a standard of reproduction-quality for each individual format as possible.

Each customer it's own needs and interests: each their own product. In this case, as said, the Oppo gearing towards higher playback-quality, the Helios towards more playback-flexibility.


p_n

 
Bob All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

5516 Posts
3/03
Posted - Jan 4 2007 : 3:53PM
pinc_noiz,

Just to clarify (I can be dense):

By "playback flexibility", do you mean the number of formats that a player can read?

By "playback quality", do you mean the degree of the player's fidelity to the source?

pinc_noiz
Deactivated User

758 Posts
6/05
Posted - Jan 5 2007 : 4:59AM
absolutely so indeed

Bob All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

5516 Posts
3/03
Posted - Jan 5 2007 : 1:48PM
Thanks, p_n! I really appreciate your expertise.
pinc_noiz
Deactivated User

758 Posts
6/05
Posted - Mar 4 2007 : 6:26AM
Yep: why shoot HD in the first place (some nice articles here BTW)?

Yesterday I bought a Canon DC50 camcorder (doubling as digital camera), a 'higher'-quality/ high-compatibility piece due to a high 'maximum bit rate' MPEG2/ high effective pixel count of 3690K (against 2000K-ish of most competitors), even (especially?) compared with HDV and AVCHD gear.
I'm not by far like a second Quaserman in both my knowledge and/or my handling of this topic, but having shot with several different HD camera's (all around the $1.5K mark) last two weeks did learn me some. Non-HDV/AVCHD movies look more natural to me: not primarily a technology or cost issue, but a performance one (damn: do I, man of all things blue-ray and up-converting, write this?: it is what I experienced buying a camcorder though...).


p_n

All Forums > Tech Talk > Tech Talk Forum Page 36 Plasma vs LCD vs Rear Projection > Plasma vs LCD vs Rear Projection (page 2)

Previous topic: Mobile Broadband
Next topic: Font change at ADT?
Page 2 of 2 First



Jump To: