I love those DVDs where the girl wearing panties is walking away, and the camera focus is on the butt, so you can see each butt cheek wobble, as if they are trying to escape from the panties.
I love it when the panties start to ride up, creating a wedgie.
I love it when the panties are pulled down, revealing a big, round, bare, butt.
However...
I hate g-strings.
They just annoy me.
To me, they are neither one thing nor the other.
You think you've reached bare butt, but's there's this annoying piece of cloth in the way!
As I said, I love to see a girl in panties, as it creates the expectation of what is to come.
I love a bare butt, seeing it in all its glory.
But g-strings, I hate 'em.
I hate it when I buy a butt fetish DVD, and the girls spend half the time in g-strings.
I hate it in gonzo DVDs, when the direction is "show us your butt", and the girl turns around to show the butt, but there is a g-string in the way, so you can't see the ass crack! To me, that is not a butt shot! I'm watching porn, I can see g-strings down at the beach!
I hate it when, during the tease segment before the scene, the girl is shown wiggling her butt, but again that annoying g-string is in the way!
I know g-strings they are popular these days, as so many adult DVDs have women wearing them, so I guess I'm resigned to looking at them if I want to watch porn, but they are one piece of clothing I wish had never been invented.
Patience is a virtue, but who wants to be virtuous? 4283 Posts 4/00
Posted - Nov 29 2006 : 1:47PM
once again, we have a thread that shows how diverse the opinions of viewers are... which is why mixing it up instead of always showing the same thing is a wonderful thing.
I've just watched Alexis Texas in Anabolic's Ass For Days #4, they took far too long to remove her g-string/thong during the scene, this ruined the scene for me, I wanted to see her bare ass.
I personally think G-strings are sexy as hell. I love it when girls pull it half way down and the string is wrapped around their butt cheeks. How could anyone NOT find that sexy?
Bisexual, Ass Creampie Nymphomaniac, UK 130 Posts 11/04
Posted - Aug 29 2007 : 1:10PM
For me G-strings are pretty much there to cover the front. To be honest if it isn't that time of the month you might as well go underwear free unless you want to avoid embarrassment with those short skirts and white trousers. Just to let you know these things aren't cheap, you pay more for less cloth (in this case string), pfff. Love Louisa
I agree that there needs to be more variety in the panty department. But I don't hate g-strings.... I'd prefer to see some thongs with a bit more material, but they all have their place. But "The Death of The G-String" could be a good film title for scenes that involve the females' g-strings being ripped off are something during the action.
I hate 'em too. I just made a thread about this the other day. This thread didn't come up when I searched. I guess I didn't use the right words. Anyway, completely agree. G-strings are just OK. But what's the point? It's dental floss for the asshole, basically. I like panties. I like ass. I like to see a nice ass in panties. G-strings are silly. Want to show the bare ass? You take off the panties.
I think G Strings are hot, but i also like boyshorts and no underwear at all. It is all a matter of diversity for me, as long as it isn't granny panties.
Micro G-strings and thongs are the ultimate turn on for me, especially when worn with 5 inch or higher heels. I love to see the girl's thighs open wide so that the tiny patch of material is stretched tight across her hopefully wet and welcoming pussy. Of course, I like knickers and panties too, especially if there is a damp patch on display! lol! I wish that the manufacturers of these garments would extend their range of 'naughties' with sexy comments. I bought my gf a thong recently which had written on it 'I feel like a million - one at a time boys! She thought it was hilarious and promised to wear it next time she partied! Knowing her as I do, she will try her best (with condoms of course). Maybe the makers of these garments could expand their range to include other messages e.g. Enter! Why are u waiting? Kiss me Kwik! Cum inside!
If you can't fuck a girl every which way but loose while she wears a g-string, you are doing something wrong. I can't imagine one being "in the way" of anything. There just isn't anything to them to BE in the way. I dislike them as well though. Anytime a girl is wearing one in a movie, I think she would look better in something else. I AM a big fan of thongs, which cover a bit more and are big enough to have patterns or designs or whatever.
[Link]
Clam Digger Deactivated User
Many a man fails as an original thinker simply because his memory is too good. 2268 Posts 1/05
Posted - Dec 26 2007 : 3:25PM
Thongs, g-strings sexy lingerie all are turn ons to me - if they are worn by the the right kind of female (eg, somebody hot). At the very least I enjoy a lot of fore-play with them on. I am disappointed if they come off to quickly.
I think my aversion to them is that I like it when the whole ass is covered with a material that clings tightly to the skin and yet also gets easily "wedged" in a girl's asscrack or pussy. I like the tease of seeing the outline of what I want without actually seeing it. That and I find certain materials to be highly erotic. Latex, satin, silk, high thread count cotton, etc. g-strings are often made of stiff materials and even though they do get wedged in the pussy and ass, it just isn't as erotic to me as other materials and apparel.
To me that looks as sexy as if someone had taken a Sharpie and drew 2 lines across her ass. Yeah, she is sexy, but it has nothing to do with the Sharpie lines.
Except for fishnets, I personally dislike all lingerie because it stands in the way. What I really hate the most in porn is socks, nylons, stockings and closed shoes which hide the legs and the feet.
Patience is a virtue, but who wants to be virtuous? 4283 Posts 4/00
Posted - Dec 27 2007 : 2:22PM
3sb - I totally get what you're saying. However, these are the reasons I LIKE g-strings... - It's the least possible material you can wear without being naked. :) - You can keep your panties on and still have no problems fucking in any position. - You're kinda right about the sharpie thing. It's as much for decoration as it is for coverage. Exactly why I used to like tan lines in the 90s - they gave NO coverage, but still added to the sexiness of the girl. - It's a personality thing - a girl wearing a gstring is in no way going to be perceived as a prude, whereas a girl wearing a thong might just be trying to avoid panty lines. Those things being said, I also like a sexy thong or boy shorts on a hot chick. How do I avoid panty lines? I go without. :)
You can't ask for the death of the g-string once you saw Ruby walking in one in the opening scene of Buttman in the Crack. I've said it before but Stagliano really knows how to dress the girls in his Buttman movies. I also loved the outfit Leah Martini wears in the same movie. I think Borat used the same piece for his promo tour.
Patience is a virtue, but who wants to be virtuous? 4283 Posts 4/00
Posted - Dec 27 2007 : 6:52PM
RFrog- cool. I'm glad I'm a little coherent today. Crazy f'ing week. :) Yea - a better way to put it is, sometimes I don't really want to see a girl's pussy right that second, so having a big of material covering it (but not the butt cheeks AT ALL) is cool, and adds to the tease for me.
I used to be the same but recently, I've been coming around a bit. I used to really despise socks and stockings but I'm (slowly) learning to appreciate them. Along with shoes. Hell, I've even been getting into feet a little bit lately as I've tried to work on expanding my horizons. I just wish nylons and so forth didn't completely and utterly dominate the leg fetish genre. There should be room for guys who like bare feet and legs.
Interesting to read the feedback on this, thanks all for the comments. I have to admit, I know I'm on a losing cause with this, there's obviously a lot of people out there that love g-strings and thongs, they are so frequently used in porn. As I said, I like panties and I like a bare butt, but I don't find g-strings a turn on. To me, they are neither one thing nor the other, it's just frustrating. It's nothing to do with being able to have sex with a girl in a g-string, it's just that as a porn viewer, I much prefer panties in the build up to a scene. I've just finished watching Big Slippery White Butts 4, and it was great to see all the girls wearing bikini panties, the occasional wedgie, then panties pulled down to reveal bare butts, that's my kind of movie! However, to each his own. That picture in this thread of the girl in the g-string doesn't appeal to me, I'd much prefer a bare butt or a picture like this.
[Link]
Clam Digger Deactivated User
Many a man fails as an original thinker simply because his memory is too good. 2268 Posts 1/05
Posted - Jan 4 2008 : 3:10PM
It does seem to me that you see a lot more of panties,thong or g-strings left on during the actual fucking in European based scenes then you necessarily see in scenes based here. I also notice, for example, that a lot of Manuel Ferrara's and, Steve Holmes scenes do a lot of this. And, of course they are both from Europe.
G-Strings fuckin rock in my opnion. Nothing is sexier. There is just something about having two dental floss thin peices of cloth stichted together with a piece of two by two lace or silk. grrrrrrrrrrrooooooowww, thats fuckin sexy. Long live the G, he's my homie. Edited by - solidsnake on 1/4/2008 5:23:36 PM
This is what I like. I don't have a problem with g-strings or thongs, but I prefer something like this. Oh,and thanks Khyber for this pic of Crissy Moon, one of my favorite newer girls!