You know, I truly didn't expect to hear the word maudlin today. Thanks, Bob, thanks ma m, thanks ADT. You've been great, and I mean that from the bottom of my hardened little heart. (Don't believe it, it's big, hell, it's friggin huge).
You know you're not the first person to say that porn makes monogamy easier (I know I've said it, and have friends who agree), just the first person I've seen get shredded for it.
When I point and say "what would Bob have done", remember there are four fingers pointing back at moi. I wonder the same thing. When I feel I'm losing the battle to come to terms with (or at least serenely accept) the internal dichotomy created when the needs and wants of the corporeal form jangle so harshly against those of the intellectual and spiritual selves, I drink. I suggest more beer. Let the superego take charge and repress the ego for a change. I'd recommed a little mental illness, too, but it's like drugs, not everyone can handle it.
Truthfully, it's my love for my children that has kept me monogamous, not porn.
What porn has done is to ease the pain of the trade-off of keeping my family together at the expense of feeling sexually deprived.
Unless and until I can manage to untie that Gordian knot (for instance, by convincing my wife to "open up" our marriage) or see my way clear through to severing it, the part of me that wants more frequent, more uninhibited, and more fun sex is going to continue to feel like shit.
I wish I had the words to soothe you Bob, but I won't blow smoke up your ass. If she's not ready to change, or is unwilling to accomodate your needs, there's not much you can do. I understand staying together for the sake of the children. I've been there.
One thing you might consider is how strong the pull is between your wife and the children. She might feel that mothers don't luxuriate in sexual indulgence. She might be martyring her sexuality for her kids. Lots of us have done so. An exemplary mother certainly can't allow herself to be a depraved harlot even temporarily, even with the father of her children. Guilt is a powerful and destructive force. Some women never overcome it, and others learn to put it aside as they mature.
At the time we got married, the sex was good. The disparity was there even then but, being relatively young, I thought (foolishly it turns out) that things would get even better as trust and intimacy grew between us. But it didn't work out that way.
It wasn't until the kids were well along -- and she had opted out of both couples counseling and individual therapy -- that I began to realize that things in the sex department weren't going to get any better. Denial is seductive and powerful, but only up to a point.
that's terrible. especially if you love her/each other. i couldn't ever imagine being in a situation like that, and i have no idea how i'd handle it. kudos to you for finding a way to make things work.
Listen here dawg, If I EVER see that you've read my man journal, (men don't keep diaries), again, and then copied it word for word in an internet messageboard for all the world to see, I will sue you for blatant plagerism. And then I'll kick your ass. And then I'll buy you a beer.
That's MY misery up there, not yours.
BSD (23 years and counting, about the last 7 of 'em have been REAL tough.)
P.S. -
I'm down here in San Diego, and I know you're somewhere up in L.A. We gotta have a beer.
Sorry to hear things are this difficult for you, Bob. You'll already know that this sort of umm libido incompatibility isn't rare. A psychologist I know has written a couple of books about it. That link is to an amazon page which should also show lists for sexual incompatibility. I imagine you've already had a go at books since you mention couples counselling etc, but I thought I'd make the suggestion in case.
The other thing I wondered was this - is she aware just how lousy this makes you feel?
She's very aware. I'm not shy about expressing my feelings.
Edited to Add: I don't want to paint her as a bitch, because she's not. She had childhood traumas around both abandonment and sex that she's never really been able to get past.
I can only imagine that talking to her about it might evoke in her singly, alternately or mix and match, feelings of guilt, inadequacy, frustration, unfair expectations, pressure, defensiveness, disgust ...
Any of those? All of those?
"I don't like the things those girls do in that mess you watch. It doesn't turn me on. Don't ask me to do them. Besides, I can't believe you actually like some of that stuff."
"Why can't you just love me the way I am instead of making me feel like I'm not good enough because I'm not into [monkeys, funny hats, snorting horseradish, etc.]."
"I don't like that I don't make you happy. Stop making me feel like something's wrong with me just because you have a problem with wanting sex all the damn time."
"And just why do you want sex / jerk off so much? Is that normal? Doctor, is he normal?"
If I'm way off base, tell me. I can't get in the zone if I don't have the right subtext to guide me.
If it turns out you get some on the side to take the edge off, you have to tell us because I'm using it for my book.
You're right on the money -- everything you said, I've heard.
For me, getting some "on the side" doesn't work. Not for moral reasons anymore -- I'm just not a good enough liar. The available choices are (1) live monogamously with her and take the hit, or (2) get a divorce.
Both options are bad. It's just a question of which shit sandwich I choose. I've been sticking with (1) for the longest time -- partly because, until recently, I thought that some improvement might be possible. I no longer think so.
Oh, God, dude - I'm sorry. You're right. Hope is dead, love is a construct of convenience, and passion is just a temporary chemical reaction. I'd start practicing my lying, then, if I were you, or just kill myself.
Let Bob pick up the tab, BSD - he's not going to need money where he's going.
I can't bring myself to cheat. (Not out of any great committment to, or respect for, her. Just my own intrinsic morality won't let me.)
We are basically incommunicado. (Although not hostile, which is actually worse. There is no passion, good or bad. We really don't even fight that much anymore. We're no longer invested enough to get that emotional. Oh yeah, I remember sex, it's something that happened YEARS ago.)
And I will not leave my 15 year old Asperger's Syndrome (a form of autism) son, and 12 year old daughter, solely to her mismanagement.
So we soldier on. Two ships that passed in the night long ago.
I refuse to lie to you - 1) being empathic with you can be a real pain sometimes and 2) I am thankful, thank you.
Don't be a martyr. I didn't see my dad for about ten years growing up, but I moved in with him when I was 15 and we're still close. Yes, that's the devil's advocate you hear, and yes, it's just me adding insult to injury.
Is sex really that important? She's right, you're a Freak, with a capital "F".
I'll leave you to your misery. I'll be back with some salt for them wounds, though.
Bob, BSD
*sigh* Aw, jeez, guys.
You're making me feel like a rich man in a soup kitchen. Let's forget about your problems for a minute and think how awkward it must be for me with my sane, rational, non-frigid wife.
Integrity and a sense of responsibility must suck. How do you slimes sleep at night?
Never mind, I think I know, and remind me not to shake your hands when we meet unless I know you've washed them first.
You guys ready to beat my ass yet?
You both know you deserve better. You know what your options are. You are aware of the long-term consequences of your decisions. It's painfully obvious that the universe is unfolding just as unfairly as it always has, but it's picking on you in particular and if you feel persecuted, you're certainly entitled.
that's what i meant. it may not be to your advantage, but at least you have somebody. you're not sitting alone christmas morning, carving into your wrists with a rusty blade.
You might think that, given how young you are. But it just isn't so.
Partly that's because there are several different kinds of "love". Even if a person is blessed with some of those kinds (for me, friend-love with my wife and parent-love with my children), they may feel starved for another kind (for me, sexual love).
Here's the weird thing, which I'll bet you can relate to:
However bad things are in my marriage (and it fluctuates), I often look at my kids and think, if not for her I wouldn't have them -- I might have other kids, but not them.
For that reason, despite the rest, I wouldn't undo what's been done.
I love my kids, but in truth I never wanted kids. And I was very clear about that before I was married. And the entire time we were dating, up to and through our marriage, my ball and chain was adament about not wanting children as well. I was, "Okay, this might work."
My mistake was believing that a 19 year old "woman" (term used loosely), really knew what she was talking about when it came to never having kids. I believe that she meant it at the time, but I should have been smart enough to not put so much stock in that. Because by the time she got to 26 and all her sisters were having babies, and life was looking a little different to her, and that "motherly" thing was jonesing on her, she started singing a much different song.
And there I was, seven years into this, fully invested, and standing there.
So I swallowed hard and did the right thing.
Don't get me wrong, I love my kids, and wouldn't give them back. I honestly believe that I would not still be here if not for them. Especially with my son being a special needs guy, and me being more in tune with him than anyone else. (Not because she's been a deficient Mom, it's just that I've spent more time with him than anyone else.) As long as they are here, I wouldn't think of splitting. And truthfully, we've (she and I) reached an operating level where the kids are not really harmed by our having grown distant. There is no open hostility. We sing from the same music, we're reasonably united in our spproach to the kids and how we conduct our lives, and we do function well as a family. But neither she nor I is happy with the state of our personal relationship and have just resigned to subordinate that to the other things we consider important. Many would say that this is what all marriages do at some point, and to some extent.
But hindsight being what it is, if I had to do it all over again, I can't say that I would.
I woke up this morning (the 10th of February). All the rancor I'd felt toward her from the fight we had a couple of days before over the "I'd Rather Eat Chocolate" book had passed.
It was my wife's birthday. All I felt was the desire to reconnect in the ways that we do connect (and have always connected) so well. And I wanted her to feel special and enjoy the day.
We had a very good day, she and the boys and I. Now she's asleep. The boys are long asleep. And here I am, the perennial night owl, typing away. I'll feel frustrated again tomorrow or the next day or the day after -- I know that. But right at this moment, I feel content basking in the afterglow of the very good day we spent together.
We, (she and I), agree on most things. Although we do sometimes have some childrearing philosophical differences. But since our kids are teenagers and mostly formed now, even those are pretty much in the past.
But the sex and intimate communication is a major problem, and after time that negatively colors the rest of the relationship.
It's funny, the only advice my Dad gave me at marriage, was to coordinate your financial goals and outlook, and do not get over the rocks about money, for that is the ruin of most marriages. Fight about sex or anything else in your relationship, but do not fight about money. It is a killer. And that has been the one area where me and my old lady have been in excellent concert from the beginning. Financially, we have always been in tune and pulling in the same direction, and it has served us well.
withholding sex is not ethical at all. if it's done consciously, then it's manipulative, it's about power and control. if it's actually a matter of simply not wanting to have sex, then, i can see what you mean about it being 'honest.' but, honestly, that's entrapment. how can you expect to keep your partner faithful and committed to you if you deprive them of sex? if you know they want to fuck, and you put them in a situation where they can't, and then don't find a solution to that problem... what kind of a person are you?
* maybe i don't know what i'm talking about, maybe i do...
Well, I'm sorry, but it seems to me that somebody wants it both ways. If you aren't going to have sex with your spouse that's as good as saying that you don't believe sex matters to the marriage. If sex doesn't matter to the marriage, then what is a mistress, except an indulgence?
On the other hand, if you believe sex is important to the marriage, yet refuse sexual intercourse, that is like saying, "I'm not going to fulfill my responsibilities to the marriage." Demanding sexual fidelity at the same time is like adding "But I expect you to fulfill yours." No good can come of that.
I tend to think our ancestors had the right of it. Marriage is a means to carry on the family and to accrue wealth and power. Ergo, the purpose of sexual intercourse in marriage is to have children. If sexual love happens then consider it a nice bonus. Otherwise, seek fulfillment elsewhere; discreetly, of course.
I wasn't suggesting you were the one refusing sex. I quoted you because I wanted to talk about where the moral dilemma lay, which wasn't necessarily at your feet. However, my thoughts, and hence my post, evolved into a somewhat different perspective on the situation. Sorry for the confusion.
My response to you was that it's not an easy equation of of "this is ethical, that is not." Nor, at a certain point, is it terribly meaningful from the perspective of a sex-starved spouse whether his/her partner is "withholding sex consciously" or is "simply not wanting to have sex".
My wife is a kind person, an ethical person, not a consciously manipulative person. But where does that get me? Nowhere. "Honesty" is beside the point.
In any case, (as Hardware noted), in the context of a marriage, "not wanting to have sex" can't be simple anyway.