Reviewers Recommend
Naughty Teacher Needs PussyNaughty Teacher Needs Pussy - review by Danielmayu33216
Director: Mike Quasar
Starring: Myra Moans, Gigi Dior. Read review
All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 267 > Porn condom question (for the pros)
AuthorPost
jizzbomb_10
Deactivated User

99 Posts
1/12
Posted - Jan 10 2013 : 6:30PM
With all this talk about condom requirements in porn I was just curious if the law required condoms to be worn "correctly"? What if you broke the condom purposefully than wore it broken and sorta "rolled up". Is that weird to think? Hopefully the court challenges (and 1st amendment) prevail and this nonsense goes to the wayside but would a condom worn broken still be a violation? Serious question and was curious if anyone had any thoughts.
mharris127
Senior Member

1844 Posts
8/09
Posted - Jan 10 2013 : 7:02PM
Good question. I would assume the law does require proper use of condoms and dental dams. However since porn is in the process of leaving LA County as I type this will become a non-issue. San Francisco doesn't and will likely not ever have a condom mandate. Some company owners are talking about Las Vegas and Phoenix being in the running for their new home as well but since their prostitution laws ban sex for pay even for the purpose of filming and entertainment I think in the end San Francisco and Marin County (both are in northern California so the Freeman court decision applies there as well) just got a big shot into their economy's arm with over 50 companies moving there by the end of the year. Why the biz located in Chatsworth to begin with is beyond me (before Freeman porn was mainly located in SF and Marin).
jizzbomb_10
Deactivated User

99 Posts
1/12
Posted - Jan 10 2013 : 7:20PM
Thanks for the response. Got it. Was wondering that:)
cineprep
Member

21 Posts
1/13
Posted - Jan 25 2013 : 7:46PM
No matter how the industry wants to paint this it comes down to the industry not being willing to pay the post-production costs to paint out condoms and the extra costs entailed in hiring a talented crew that actually knows how to block a scene and shoot around the condoms. This is not a free speech issue.
Don't kid yourselves.
The technology exists to give the performers better protection in the workplace but the studios simply do not want to pay for it. This 1st amendment/we're going to move song and dance is the same stuff we hear any time any regulatory regime is introduced in any industry.
It does not really surprise me that the performers are not for the law since they already work with lopsided bullshit contracts, no pension plan, no insurance, no health coverage and no union... so why would they? it is not really up to the employees in an industry where blacklisting runs rampant to decide though so while their opinion may be relevant it is to be taken with a grain of salt.
Disclaimer: I work in the legit film industry NOT the porn industry so my views on this matter may be slightly skewed towards the production staff.
FWIW: I would do the exact same thing the producers are doing if I was in their shoes since their job is to maximize profit for their investors and get films made. This is why unions and/or government regulation come in handy for workers in the entertainment industry. Just be under no illusions. This is about profit NOT free speech.
Edited by - cineprep on 1/25/2013 8:37:14 PM
RandomPrecision
Senior Member

Enjoy!
8175 Posts
3/06
Posted - Jan 26 2013 : 1:41AM
Ordering a pornographer to either censor or fake his porn is most certainly a free speech issue.
 
killbillvol69 All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

^Lucy Pinder
18631 Posts
4/08
Posted - Jan 26 2013 : 11:28AM



Jump To: