Reviewers Recommend
Blacked Raw V110Blacked Raw V110 - review by Captain Jack
Director: Derek Dozer, W.C. Walker, Vorman
Starring: Amirah Adara, Riley Star, Anna Claire Clouds, Anton Harden, Damion Dayski, Nina White, Hollywood Cash, Mannie Coco. Read review
All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 766 > Porn Directors: Please Let Us Enjoy The Facials
AuthorPost
2Big
Member


200 Posts
4/03
Posted - Apr 22 2003 : 12:19PM
Watched "To Comnpletion" yesterday, and, overall, I thought it was a pretty good feature, especially since it starred 4 of my favorite porn girls: Miko Lee, Jade Marcela, Leanni Lei, and Kaylynn.

Overall, cum shots were quite impressive, but what I don't understand, and I have noticed this in other features as well, is why the camera almost immediately zooms out after a guy has deposited his load.

I mean, I not only want to see a girl geneoursly splattered with gonad goo, but I want to see it dripping down, her face all messed up. So, instead of quickly moving on the next scene, keep the camera on the girl, maybe have her stand up and walk around, maybe even get dressed and head outside (just like in some of Rodney Moore's videos).

There is no bigger turn-off than a girl who immediately screams "cut" and sprints to the bathroom.

sk

rt
Member

42 Posts
12/01
Posted - Apr 22 2003 : 12:40PM
How about a 1 minute rule or a 2 minute rule. After a guy cums the director can't cut away for 1 minute or 2 minutes. Too often the scene is cut like 1.5 seconds after the cums. The cut is too soon. Show the woman play with it, move it around or even let us watch her clean it off. Anything but the quick cut away. My personal favorite would be to have another woman lick it off the first woman.
Skeeter Kerkove
Member

967 Posts
2/03
Posted - Apr 22 2003 : 11:16PM
The reason this happens, is because the scene has to stop quick enough, in order to get the stills taken for the back of the box cover, internet and magazines. You are right, it is a bummer. If the pictures are taken inside, the video will have lots of flashes and shutter noise. Now the good news!!! I have been having the cumshots pictures taken with a 5 thousand dollar digital camera. It makes no noise and requires no flash, as long as there is sufficent lighting.
For the past several months, when I am having the facials shot, there is no break or quick fade away! The girl plays with the cum, fingers it from her face into her mouth for a good minute, sometimes even 2 minutes. The back of the boxcover of Ass Stretchers and Clusterfuck are all digital stills. Last friday, april 18th, the entire cumshot was captured, blasting across the girls face and going into her mouth without interrupting the facial. The video will have about 2 minutes iof the girl enjoying all of the cum and spit. You will be satisfied. The name of the movie is Juggernaut. I also did it in Bait# 2. The girl stares into the camera, loving every single drop of cum she has received. Several of the shots show the cum shooting out of the guys dick in mid air and landing all over the girls face! The stills will be incredable on the back of the box cover!
You can rest assure, in time other producers and directors
will also be using this program. It does require a very, very expensive silent digital camera, however, it is worth every single dollar spent. The longer the facial and cream pie, the better!
I agree with you 100% just as I am sure the majority of this forum agrees also!
Skeeter Kerkove Porn producer, director, performer. I am a huge fan of hardcore porn and I love all of the women in porn. "God Bless Pornography" A womans ass is a beautiful thing" Woman rule!
cubesnake
Senior Member

3858 Posts
10/02
Posted - Apr 23 2003 : 12:56AM
Hi,
I 2nd that :) ... and i wouldn´t mind if ´they´ used artificial fluids for the boxcover instead of real mancream

Cube

2Big
Member

200 Posts
4/03
Posted - Apr 23 2003 : 9:36AM
Skeeter:

this is good news; and I will be looking out for your stuff. I personally don't mind if there's shutter and/or flash noise during the shoot.

I'd rather have that than the quick fade-aways we too often seen now.

sk

 
timotei
Member

UK
271 Posts
4/02
Posted - Apr 23 2003 : 11:47AM
Isn't is possible to use stills from the video footage itself instead of separate camera shots? Or isn't the video good enough quality to use as a still?

But I agree with the above comments: the footage wouldn't be ruined by having stills camera coming in, or even using a lower quality picture from the video as the promo still.

A fair number of Evil Angel titles don't strike me as having quick cuts at the end - I'm sure many of the films I've got have a reasonable amount of post-cum footage.

2Big
Member

200 Posts
4/03
Posted - Apr 23 2003 : 2:19PM
The post-cum shot part of the movie needs to be done well. I'm not interested in having the camera focus on the girl's face, and the girl justs sits there, like she's been hit with a stun gun or something.

Make her interact, get up, walk around, maybe even walk outside. Or, have some fluffer girl lick of her cum, cum dropping everywhere, etc. Be creative here. I certainly don't want to see fake cum shots on the box cover - just like in those cheesy 4-hour compilation rip-off tapes.

Also, I'm only interested in seeing post-cum stuff, if the guy actually has shot a decent load, and the load landed on the girl's face rather than on the sofa behind her.

I sure as hell don't wanna see a Randy West post-cum fiesta.

sk

shameless
Deactivated User

Moscow
1313 Posts
1/03
Posted - Apr 23 2003 : 3:47PM
I hope so. And you can certainly count me on this. 2 Big made a very good comment - also by writing he is talking about the decently big loads of course only. Drbbles are not worth showing at all, if you ask me. But big loads, yes, give us 2 minutes of after-pop-shots of that.

Now for the still photos of course artificial fluid is not the way (timotei). The way I think is Skeeters expensive camera, he can use for stills as well.

GoldHat
Member

124 Posts
4/03
Posted - Apr 23 2003 : 6:44PM
High time the guys started taking facials from the women now that more and more are able to squirt when they cum .. now that would be a turn on for me and i wouldn't have to press hard on the ff button to the next scene when the guy(s) start splattering the girl's face... always wondered why it has to be on the face.
ObiBong
Senior Member

1162 Posts
12/02
Posted - Apr 23 2003 : 7:19PM
I'm a big fan of seeing two women kiss and tongue-play with it afterward, which is always what I thought of when I heard the term "cum-swapping." I've always been disappointed that these days it just means spitting it into someone's mouth from about a foot away. I don't see any point in that.

I have bought a couple of Japanese DVDs that cater almost excessively to this fetish though, where the whole scene is just two girls kissing, and guys walk up and provide some spooge for them to share periodically. Sometimes there's no sex, just that.

It would be nice to see some of that over here, too. I wish I had remembered this during one of those "What do fans want to see" threads.

pornchick
Member

29 Posts
4/03
Posted - Apr 24 2003 : 2:02PM



Jump To: