[Link]
Satisfying Lesbian Desires - review by Captain Jack| Author | Post |
|---|---|
| mtruc Member 8 Posts 11/09 |  Posted - Nov 11 2009 : 11:25PMHi all, I've been reading many posts here but this is my first. I watched porn since the mid 80s until now. I must really say that the content has changed dramatically. Over all those years, I kept enjoying roughly the same type of acts: DPs, some domination, facials, tit fucking etc... There has always been scenes to satisfy my fantasies and I could always find a title that both my wife and I would enjoy. The proportion of passionate and intense sex was higher and that made it easy to satisfy both of us. This lasted up until earlier productions with from rocco, Ferrera, and others. Today, forget it. We still get those same type of acts, but with a lot of exaggeration with way too much gaping, slapping, mouth stretching, double anal, etc. Even though I can manage to skip unpleasant scenes myself and locate some good stuff, there is no way my wife can enjoy a continous play. No way honey. Porn lost her, and I pay the price for that. So what's with that trend? Don't get me wrong here: putting a foot on the face can be fun, but when it is done systematically, mechanically, and obviously without enjoyment from the lady, it looses all its potential. I believe that this is caused by viagra. You now get all those performers with big cocks that stay hard all afternoon, but with zero mental excitement. Their only way out (i.e. getting close to cum) is then to push it harder and harder. We get told that producers produce what we want to buy. I don't agree with that. I don't want that, but there is basically nothing else. Directors want an actor that stays hard, that's it. I would still buy passionate intense scenes. Some are still coming out, but they are lost in a sea of very unpleasant acts. -- M. Truc [Link] |
| solidsnake Member Dying To Live 266 Posts 10/07 | Posted - Nov 11 2009 : 11:41PM [Link] |
| Dan Senior Member 2056 Posts 6/07 | Posted - Nov 12 2009 : 12:06AM [Link] |
| Randomizer Member 234 Posts 6/08 | Posted - Nov 13 2009 : 3:30PM But I wouldn't blame viagra for this problem, it's the producers. Viagra does make it more difficult for the guy to cum by detaching his mental arousal from the physical effect, but that shows up at the end when the guy has to stop the sex and just jerk himself off for who knows how long (edited out), and then the cumshot is has no velocity on it because there's no hormonal drive behind it. It also doesn't help that the guys are overworked to the point they're unable to shoot much to start with. So, in summary: producers are killing porn in terms of style. Viagra and overwork are making "professionals" unable to finish a scene half as well as what you see all the time in college amateur porn. [Link] |
| mtruc Member 8 Posts 11/09 | Posted - Nov 16 2009 : 9:48PM Moments before the cumshot, in fact, I often find that the energy gets better. What I find the most annoying is the long stretch during which they just perform the circus acts without really inner sexual excitement. This is when it gets crazy and too hard for me. Without viagra, you could not do that: you'd need the buzz in your head to stay hard, thus we'd get a more passionate and intense fuck. Note that this is not a nostaligia post. Before viagra there were a lot of lame sex scenes with guys that could barely get it hard. This produced really really bad scenes. Today, these bad performers are hard like rock instead of having soft cocks that can hardly penetrate a pussy. They are still not aroused, but they gag throats, break ass holes, and distribute a few face slaps as a bonus. -- M. Truc Edited by - mtruc on 11/16/2009 9:48:45 PM [Link] |
| Randomizer Member 234 Posts 6/08 | Posted - Nov 18 2009 : 1:22AM Guys on viagra do not get better near the end -- in fact, they can't even finish "naturally" -- they fuck and fuck and fuck and feel nothing -- they have to stop and jerk themselves off to finish the scene. I do agree it hurts the quality of the scene when it's obvious one or both of the performers isn't feeling anything. The best scenes I've watched tend to involve both the guy and the girl cumming during the scene (not at the end on cue), because the arousal is mutual and circular -- watching him/her getting close and then cumming early makes the other one cum as well, well before the end of the scene. In both cases the guy/girl has to pause to collect themselves, and that's not what the director is looking for, which is a shame -- they should be encouraging that kind of real chemistry. [Link] |
| mtruc Member 8 Posts 11/09 | Posted - Nov 18 2009 : 9:22PM I wished there were tours to see an actual shooting, a little like the tours in the big LA mainstream studios! -- M. Truc [Link] |
| MrBenGrim Member 139 Posts 6/08 | Posted - Nov 18 2009 : 10:02PM Ive been thinking about buying some. Do I need to go to a physical for a prescription? [Link] |
| mharris127 Senior Member 1844 Posts 8/09 | Posted - Nov 21 2009 : 8:24AM [Link] |
| Stud_Rob Member 703 Posts 4/09 | Posted - Nov 21 2009 : 10:40AM [Link] |
| AWMDB AWMDB.com Webmaster Tracking performer appearances on adult websites across the globe 127 Posts 2/08 | Posted - Nov 21 2009 : 3:31PM Today's porn seems to be all about who can pound the girl's throat/pussy/ass the hardest, how hard you can hit her cervix and how much you can make her gag etc. It's very rare to find passionate/erotic type porn these days although there a very few specific companies (mainly in Europe) that still shoot that type. -- Have you voted for your favourites yet? AWMDB Fan Picks '09, voting ends Dec 20th. Edited by - awmdb on 11/21/2009 3:32:27 PM [Link] |
| LubeNLuv Senior Member 1854 Posts 3/06 | Posted - Nov 21 2009 : 3:56PM But to be honest, I think you are asking for a lot from porn if you expect chemistry, on-screen passion and "soul" from the performers. They are PERFORMERS, not actors, and very few of them have any kind of relationship outside the narrow confines of the cameras artificial field of view. They show up, sign the paperwork, do their performance and then move on to the next booking. Some, like olympic athletes, get really good at their performances and can be counted on to give us very convincing scene. But the vast majority are just rank amateurs who don't intend to be there longer than it takes to move onto a better paycheck elsewhere. You can't blame the blue pill for that....it may enable MORE people to partake of this profession. And considering the male to female ratio in the business, it is natural to expect the guys to be more proficient at getting a "good performance" for the camera. They aren't typically the focal point of the scene, the woman is. For the experienced porn gal, hey, you get a great match between the two and they can relax a bit and have some fun in their work for once. For the experienced guy with the newbie gal who may be going all diva or totally withdrawn, he may have to amp it up to get a decent scene for the director. I blame the issue much less on the blue pill and far more on the overall lack of attraction to the industry. It's a place to make a fast buck for most. A scene when you are brand new versus one when you are very experienced still pays about the same. In fact, arguably, the longer you stay in this business the less your scenes will pay. It's an industry based entirely on using up the talent until they no longer have value...and it shows. [Link] |
| Stud_Rob Member 703 Posts 4/09 | Posted - Nov 22 2009 : 4:59AM Porn is evolving but it shouldn't forget it's roots which is why I think particular adult film watchers will always hold Vivid, Wicked Pictures and others in high esteem because of past achievements and continuing to make features. I know others will disagree but I think there are two fairly established stances on this, so I was just trying to bring this side into discussion. [Link] |
| mrputitbackin Member 51 Posts 12/09 | Posted - Jan 21 2010 : 5:54PM [Link] |
| warrenwest67 Member Thanks for the mammaries. 966 Posts 1/07 | Posted - Jan 22 2010 : 9:52AM All that being said, I do see how it has changed porn. But I like the changes. I remember VHS porn with scenes with alot more cutaways before the cumshot. And limp dicks in photo shoots. I really don't hear the girls complaining about dicks that stay hard for too long. [Link] |
| mharris127 Senior Member 1844 Posts 8/09 | Posted - Jan 22 2010 : 4:43PM [Link] |
| Use the code below to link to this topic or a specific post. |
| URL of this thread |
| Link to this post with HTML |
| Link to this post with Forum Code |