New Pornstar Interviews - [more]
Introducing Dallas Rea

"I’m very submissive so I love being bossed around and told what to do."
All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 428 > porn scenes and natural sexuality
AuthorPost
straight
Deactivated User

5 Posts
1/09
Posted - Jan 1 2009 : 2:09PM
Every body of us is is warming up and feels depreesed in the same time when he watches a pornstar man with his extraordinary ability of making love with many other porn stars beautiful female.
normal males can not do the same thing with their normal female sex partners, they try but they can not ,this makes normal man feels deprision infront of his female, and she thinks that he is frustrated!!
infact male porn stars are freak males not natural, they inhance their ability by alot of viagra tablets to make more scences and get more income from directors,,,,
do you think that porn industry offers freaky male porn stars and un-natural scences,,and one day they will lose this trade infront of natural making love!!?
and do you think that (the golden age of porn) scences are more intimate of this digital age of porn industry!!?
Bobcat
Senior Member

1490 Posts
2/08
Posted - Jan 1 2009 : 2:36PM
Well, I agree that porn is too much "wham bam thank you mam".
I'd like to see more affection and love making, in gonzo porn.
The vast majority of male viewers have female partners and porn seems to alienate them with it's total lack of affection.
I'm constantly looking out for scenes that I can enjoy with my partner, which show sex in a more loving manner. Sadly they seem few and far between.
straight
Deactivated User

5 Posts
1/09
Posted - Jan 1 2009 : 2:46PM
your last sentense says that you agree that porn industry is not natural,,,and some how freaky!!?
I really prefer watching scense full with natural sensations before making love without making me feel that they are helping camera man to show their genitalia
Bobcat
Senior Member

1490 Posts
2/08
Posted - Jan 1 2009 : 2:58PM
My point is why can't we show sex as it is at home, more like what people actually do.
The fantasy element is that the performers are very attractive.
I'm not against close up views of genitalia, just show kissing and more natural positions as well. Closed missionary is incredibly hot, but hardly ever used, that's such a shame!
love_that_porn
Member

246 Posts
9/08
Posted - Jan 1 2009 : 3:25PM
While I enjoy a "Wham Bam" gonzo flick maybe for 75% of my porn viewing, I also enjoy the "Golden Age" type movie that has a storyline, dialogue and, hopefully some kind of chemistry between the characters.
When my girlfriend watches porn with me she much prefers movies that has loads of intimacy; where there's passionate, extended kissing, tongues licking tongues and lips, even chins; where the woman is looking deep into the eys of the man while she's sucking his cock and when he's shooting his load; where the man isn't afraid of kissing his woman after swallowing his cum; where the woman gets thoroughly satisfied first, having one or a few orgasms before his turn cums; where the sex is fluid and sensual and not at all mechanical, as is the case with gonzo.
Some of the Playgirl produced porn have these scenes, but most times you just have to luck out and take a chance on a feature film. ADT reviews do help in this regard.
 
brown_eyed_girl
Member

58 Posts
12/08
Posted - Jan 2 2009 : 2:45AM
But does gonzo and more sensual/passionate types of porn have to be mutually exclusive? As Bobcat suggested, can't they add some more natural positions into a gonzo flick instead of always trying to show the close-up of the genitals? Keep the dirtiness and the "no frills quickness" of gonzo but add a little more heat by decreasing the amount of posing/positioning for the camera, and increasing the amount of kissing and full body contact? Often nothing is hotter than full body contact.
Bobcat
Senior Member

1490 Posts
2/08
Posted - Jan 2 2009 : 6:33AM
^ You should checkout sporty girls from Elegant angel. Jenna Haze and James Dean did a very sensual scene together and Dakoda Brookes and Mick Blue made love to each other too! This was the only big studio DVD that I saw this year that showed any chemistry between the couples.
SexyHard
Member

673 Posts
6/07
Posted - Jan 2 2009 : 10:29AM
I see a real opportunity for someone to step up and become the AbbyWinters of BG porn. Comstock could do it, but they release something like one scene every six months.
Some of Jessica Drake's scenes with Brad Armstrong bring out the energy of their real-life relationship. Their first scene is Fallen is incredibly hot.
Also I really liked Joanna Angel's scene with James Deen in XOXO Joanna Angel.
nightwing
Member

44 Posts
7/08
Posted - Jan 2 2009 : 11:28AM
Its next to impossible to find real love making stuff in the mainstream porn market i actually find it laughable that you would expect it. I suggest you try the small market made for women i have never checked it out but the men are supposedly more handsome (not that i care) and there is more of a lovemaking aspect to it then the pure "wham bam" of the mainstream stuff which is what sells so what will probably be the status quo for some time to come.
What i would love to see more of is kissing in scenes its VERY absent in most flicks what is worse then anything though is seeing a male performer going in for a kiss and the female doing her best to avoid it (leaning back, acting like a ragdoll while being kissed or sometimes outright turning away) while still trying to look like she is turned on i HATE THAT its definatly a wood killer.
I know some females see kissing as intimate(which to some of us stupid males is still a crazy idea giving the proffession they are in)but we generally respect what they want in this aspect but
Is it so difficult to set a do and do not do before a scene on the subject of kissing so such awkward moments do not occur?.
inquisitive
Member

162 Posts
12/08
Posted - Jan 2 2009 : 11:51AM
There was a former pornstar who came out with her own productions. The movies catered to more romance and stuff. Can't recall her name.
Bobcat
Senior Member

1490 Posts
2/08
Posted - Jan 2 2009 : 12:54PM
I've got to disagree on both counts.
There's stacks of g/g stuff for starters, just think of Abbeywinters, there's also quite a bit of b/g, it's just hard to find as it's not listed as a genre as such.
Secondly, with the amount of people who keep asking for a b/g version of Abbeywinter, there's obviously a big market for the stuff. Porn studios should take note, someone could make a killing by doing a gonzo hardcore series with more "normal" sex in it.
Lastly, I don't see it's the women performers who don't want to kiss, afterall they do A2M, so Kissing a guy can't be such a big deal?
I have a DVD by Doghouse Digital called "Real Naughty Couples" that could be used as blue print for such a series, it's fantastic and very couples friendly. Unfortunatly I think they only did one volume, that's all I could find, I know I'd have bought many many more volumes of this, if they were available.
killbillvol69 All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

^Lucy Pinder
18634 Posts
4/08
Posted - Jan 2 2009 : 3:24PM
^Several female performers over the years have expressed a dislike for kissing in scenes. It's as the poster above said, they consider it "intimate", as opposed to something like A2M which is just pure sex and lust and nastiness.
There are even a select few who have kissing on their list of things they will never do under any circumstances, like Max Hardcore regular Catalina. This is a woman who regularly swallows another person's vomit and piss. But she will not kiss.
As the poster above mentioned, it's difficult for us as men to understand this, but there are in fact many women who associate kissing with a level of intimacy they're not willing to explore in their porn careers, in which they do not wish to become intimate.
This is also very common among prostitutes. Remember the movie Pretty Woman? That was the one rule: no kissing. Once Julia Roberts' character broke that rule, she found herself in trouble as her emotions started to take control of her.
Bobcat
Senior Member

1490 Posts
2/08
Posted - Jan 2 2009 : 3:34PM
^ I thought girls had got over that these days.
Just about all girlcalls now offer GFE and PSE, they normally just say no french.
Maybe you're right, I have know idea, it just seems strange, it would be interesting to hear one of the girl performers views on this subject?
Skyscrapper
Member

667 Posts
12/08
Posted - Jan 2 2009 : 3:44PM
Come on, now. After you're in a relationship..be it love or lust or both.....as men we wanna kiss less. Just suck my dick and let's get down. So I think porn girls got the right idea. So let's get that going everywhere.
Bobcat
Senior Member

1490 Posts
2/08
Posted - Jan 2 2009 : 3:58PM
^Really?
I'd say it's the other way round, like;
Boy meets girl, boy fucks her senseless, boy and girl become a couple, sex beomes more intimate and less frantic.
 
brown_eyed_girl
Member

58 Posts
12/08
Posted - Jan 2 2009 : 5:16PM
Classic relationship killer. Boring sex never leads to something good...
Anyway, it's not like I'm even looking for romance or storyline (in fact I hate storylines usually), just less posed and mechanical sex, where they look like robots, and look like they're just going through the motions.
ntfighter
Member

645 Posts
7/07
Posted - Jan 2 2009 : 5:40PM
^ I agree. I believe there is a visceral response to seeing people having sex. A couple having sex in doggy, we see the posture and it touches something in the old retilian part of the brain. The fucking for the camera, porny positions just don't elicit the same response.
Skyscrapper
Member

667 Posts
12/08
Posted - Jan 2 2009 : 6:15PM
That's one version. Another;
Boy meets girl, boys fucks her senseless, boy and girl become a couple, sex becomes more intimate but both the boy and the girl miss fucking other people. So they find someone else to kiss, weather on purpose or by accident. Newness is just as powerful intimacy. Maybe they stay together. Maybe they don't. Maybe the boy meets another girl, the girl another boy. And they repeat. OR the boy and the girl are swingers. Which takes us into yet another version. See what kissing can do?
Bobcat
Senior Member

1490 Posts
2/08
Posted - Jan 2 2009 : 7:04PM
Of course, their are many ways to play the game!
Gonzo porn only depicts a few of them, whilst largely ignoring others, which is really at the heart of my request/rant.
I've got throat fucking, anal pounding, gaping, Gang bang movies etc etc, they are all readily available in their thousands. I'm just asking for some well produced "nice" porn with attractive professional performers, which is just about intimate sex and not contained in a cheesy movie plot. Is this too much to ask for?
brown_eyed_girl
Member

58 Posts
12/08
Posted - Jan 2 2009 : 7:06PM
I don't think it's too much to ask for at all ;)
I think it would be more pleasant for the performers to film as well. With some of the extreme stuff they have to do I'm not surprised it comes off as mechanical.
Algaliarept
Senior Member

3557 Posts
7/08
Posted - Jan 2 2009 : 7:39PM
Kristina Rose in her latest stuff (BWA and Dirty Girl) is either one of the best actresses in the world or is getting off. Watching her in those two movies was one of the first times in a long time while watching porn that I didn't fast forward. My eyes were as big as saucers and I just couldn't look away, she was intense. Kudos!
skronker
Notable Legendary Icon

Scopophiliac
9780 Posts
9/02
Posted - Jan 3 2009 : 12:19AM
Thank God.
HansGeist
Member

133 Posts
6/08
Posted - Jan 3 2009 : 12:49AM
Are you thinking of Candida Royalle's Femme Productions?
inquisitive
Member

162 Posts
12/08
Posted - Jan 4 2009 : 11:25AM
Yes, good memory! Thanks for the reminder.
Draxxx
Senior Member

3831 Posts
2/07
Posted - Jan 4 2009 : 2:21PM
On this board I may be in the minority but for the most part I don't want to see the type of stuff some of you crave so much.
My personal take on porn (and I'm sure many many porn watchers would agree) is that I don't want to see sex that reflects "real life sex" in my porn. I don't want to see girls dressed like regular girls. I don't want to see people having sex in the few typical positions. I don't need to see lots of kissing. Why? Simple. Because I live in the real world where I see plenty of girls who dress in typical regular clothes. I have sex with girls in a few typical positions. I don't want to pay to watch something I can actually do or see all the time for free.
Some guys go to hookers to get what they can't get at home. Some guys watch porn to see what they can't get in real life. In porn I want to see bigger than life "over the top" sex, positions, clothes, and women. I want the 6 inch heels. I want the make up. I want crazy posistions that look cool on screen but is uncomfortable in real life. I want loud moans. I wanna see girls who I'd never run into in real life. I wanna see girls just tease my for awhile with their big breasts or big bubble butts. I want intense sex that doesn't let up.
To each his/her own. It's about whatever floats your boat. The main reason I bring up all this stuff is show some of you that there is an audience for the stuff you claim to hate or be tired of and why that audience likes what's out there. Some of you are convinced that what you want is wanted by the majority of people and it's simply not true. I'm not saying what you want to see is bad/worse/wrong but try to understand that the stuff you want would be catering to a fairly small audience and none of the big companies or directors are going to go that route to supply product to an audince that can't supply big returns.
 
Bobcat
Senior Member

1490 Posts
2/08
Posted - Jan 4 2009 : 2:44PM
^ I agree to a point. 90% of the time I want to watch the standard fare that US gonzo dished up for us. 2% of the time, for what reasons I don't know but I'll get something out that's nasty, Max Hardcore or similar. That leaves the remainder when I'd go for something that's erotic or smoochy, I'd also call this female friendly porn. If you can get your women to watch and enjoy porn with you, it adds a whole lot to the experience.
brown_eyed_girl
Member

58 Posts
12/08
Posted - Jan 4 2009 : 4:42PM
Actually, I think you're in the majority and we're the ones in the minority on this board. All I see are guys wanting more anal, more dp, more gagging, more creampies, more dp, etc., etc. And you have to admit, that's mostly what's offered out there. And yeah, to each their own right? I'm not asking for your porn to stop being made, I would just like the kind of porn that I enjoy to be made a little more often. Try as I might, I just don't find fake or unrealistic stuff erotic at all. I guess I empathize with the performers too much, and project my own desires into scenes, and if the sex is so extreme (be it positions or whatever) that it obscures any chemistry or passion, then it doesn't turn me on.
I also think it's a bummer for everyone in the industry that half the population (i.e generally most women and some men) ignores porn and thinks it's disgusting and demeaning because of the majority of what's put out. All I'm asking for is a little diversity.
killbillvol69 All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

^Lucy Pinder
18634 Posts
4/08
Posted - Jan 4 2009 : 7:38PM
^Yeah, as much as we do see a bit of a change happening, the fact is that the majority of porn is made with men in mind, not women. So the women who do want to watch porn will have to look a little harder to find what they like, and they'll find less of it than the stuff they don't like.
It is changing though. There are companies being run by women, there are companies whose focus is women, etc. But the more we see those, the more we're also seeing a reaction to those (or vice versa - it's a chicken-egg thing): more brutal, more violent, more extreme, more fake, more whatever - perhaps it's because the porn companies who used to make things fairly hardcore now look around and say "hey, the people that don't like the stuff to be really extreme now have all sorts of options, so we can go from fairly hardcore to incredibly hardcore to appeal to the crowd that wants it, and those that don't can check out those other companies". Perhaps the people who don't like things too hardcore are saying "hey things seem to be getting more extreme all the time, maybe we should start a company and make porn that might appeal to the opposite crowd a bit more".
Realistically, I'm sure both things happen. As well as all sorts of other scenarios I haven't mentioned. But my point is that what I think we're seeing is porn becoming more and more fractured, more and more separated into all its little niches, all the time.
You no longer see a woman with a hairy bush in the same movie as a woman who waxes her pubes. You don't see busty women in the same movies as flat-chested ones, anal sex in movies with vag-only scenes, tall girls in movies with short girls, interracial scenes in movies with scenes where both performers are of the same race. There are exceptions to this of course, but it really is the case that more and more, each individual DVD series or website is catering to one very, very specific thing - and nothing else.
It so happens that there are far more that cater to the more hardcore scenes that are geared towards various male fantasies, than there are ones that are appealing to female erotic desires.
And I'm not sure I see this changing any time soon. From the voices of fans, they seem to want their porn to be even more specialized.
[edit: then again, every time someone mentions that the more extreme stuff caters to men more than women, there's always a female fan (or performer, or director) who comes along and says that this is the kind of stuff they love, so it does cater to women. And then the argument kind of loses steam. Of course there are people of both genders who enjoy both trends - more and less extreme - but I think the thing that is often forgotten by the female fan who comes in and says she loves the extreme stuff is that she is probably in the minority when it comes to the desires of her gender, just as the man who wants to watch the softer stuff is probably in the minority in his.]
Edited by - killbillvol69 on 1/4/2009 7:43:08 PM
BlackSix All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

pornography wasn't sex but fantasies of an impossibly hospitable world
12377 Posts
9/07
Posted - Jan 4 2009 : 10:45PM
Actually Draxxx you're the one becoming a broken record about this, I haven't seen anyone here say that no one likes the rougher and/or more generic porn, they're simply asking for something different.
I'd also disagree with your assumption (based on nothing) that there is no audience for what others are asking for, Abby Winters is a hugely successful porn site.
Draxxx
Senior Member

3831 Posts
2/07
Posted - Jan 5 2009 : 6:44AM
^I'm a broken record?! Ever since I've discovered this site there's been a constant complaining about this topic. Even right now there's about 3 threads basically about this very topic. It's always the same rap that pops up. That you're all victims because you aren't getting what you want and the people making porn don't know what they're doing.
After ignoring much of it I decided to chime in with what I see as the reasons you aren't seeing what you want and to present the other side of the coin saying there's a big audience that wants to see the type of porn some of you claim to be tired of. I don't think that side is represented much during these many discussions.
I never said there isn't an audience for what you want to see, I merely pointed out it isn't as big as the one that likes the "harder" stuff. In fact I went out of my way to make myself clear on that. I also explain why why I think things are the way they are. But because it's not what you want to hear you decide it's based on "nothing".
Draxxx
Senior Member

3831 Posts
2/07
Posted - Jan 5 2009 : 6:59AM
I see that happening too. The problem is and probably will be for many people that most of this type of stuff will be done by smaller companies and probably won't get the exposure some people would like to see. Plus those movies probably won't star the bigger stars many people want to see.
That only makes sense. I don't think most people want to see a loving tender sex scene mixed in with a typical harder movie. I don't know if any of the big directors would be the right people to give that audience what they want. The same goes for the girls. For example...If Kelly Wells decided to do that type of stuff could she pull in off? Would her fans be able to forget what she's done in the past and judge her accordingly?
ntfighter
Member

645 Posts
7/07
Posted - Jan 5 2009 : 11:55AM
^^^I'm advocating variety, porn on a continuum. The market isn't either or, one or the other. Like the poster above wrote we are asking for diversity.
If the market is truly working as expected we would find producer exploring different option, rather than variation on the same theme.
Maybe producer are superfluous. His only function seems to be to insure that the penetration is visible.
Edited by - ntfighter on 1/5/2009 12:39:10 PM
BlackSix All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

pornography wasn't sex but fantasies of an impossibly hospitable world
12377 Posts
9/07
Posted - Jan 5 2009 : 1:58PM
I actually don't mind harder stuff when it's well done (eg. Jake Malone, Mason). I'd just prefer some more choice and variety in what I can watch.
Can you present any proof, other than a 'feeling,' that the audience for harder stuff is bigger than that for soft? FTV/Danni on the softcore side and Bang Bros/Brazzers on the middle-of-the-road end of things both seem to do very well. Kink.com is doing well but so is Abby Winters.
BTW I do agree that there were one too many threads recently complaining about this but it's better than another 'When will she do anal?' thread.
Edited by - BlackSix on 1/5/2009 2:16:57 PM
Draxxx
Senior Member

3831 Posts
2/07
Posted - Jan 5 2009 : 8:17PM
When I say "harder" stuff I mean in comparison to what I think some of you are talking about and not particularly "harder" in the Max Hardcore or Rocco sense "hard". I mean the range of stuff that's typically sold in the average adult video store.
I have no clue what type of stuff Abby Winter does but it sounds like the Candida Royalle line of movies aimed at couples and women that she did years ago. I might be wrong on that. But in general I think the stuff most of you here are describing is basically "softer" more "sensual" stuff. Maybe I'm wrong but I've always seen that type of stuff has as more of a niche in the overall world of porn.
Then there's the fact that even though some of you are saying you want this type of stuff most of you are specific in just what you actually want to see. While you say you want to see Abby Winter type stuff I'm betting not not everyone shares your enthusiasm for it. They may want more of an Andrew Blake type of porn. Some may want the Candida Royalle type stuff. Some may want the slo-mo artsy DIGITAL PLAYGROUND type stuff. What about the people who want to see 70s/early 80s type porn? If a company did start making one of those types of movies the fan of the remaining types still wouldn't be happy and would say the right type isn't being made...and there needs to be more diversity. No matter what's done some people will feel slighted and continue to complain.


Draxxx
Senior Member

3831 Posts
2/07
Posted - Jan 5 2009 : 8:27PM
So what exactly do you want to see? Do you want to see established directors and performers try and ape the Abby Winters vibe? Do you want Abby Winters to become a big line like EVIL ANGEL or JULES JORDAN? Do you want new/unknowns direct and star in those movies? Do you want a specailized line of that stuff or to be incorporated into the stuff we have now? Name some comapnies, directors and pornstars who you think could deliver what you want to see.
 
brown_eyed_girl
Member

58 Posts
12/08
Posted - Jan 6 2009 : 12:29AM
No need to argue about this Draxxx - i highly doubt your porn is at any risk of going away.
I just want to see less mechanical sex. I want to see chemistry and passion. This does not mean it has to be soft and sensual like Abby Winters. I'm just as much a fan of frantic fuck-me-now sex than the average porn consumer. I've seen some Jules Jordan and some Evil Angel stuff that I found very erotic.
Dan
Senior Member

2056 Posts
6/07
Posted - Jan 6 2009 : 8:42AM
Yes, good sex includes chemistry and passion between the actors and not just the mechanical interaction between their body parts. Mechanical interaction you can have even with a doll. But only real people can have chemistry and passion during their sex-action.
People usually like to fantasize about doing things that they can't normally do. And that's why ordinary or average sex in porn simply won't do. There is no entertainment value in watching something you've done yourself many times before.
To be entertaining, porn sex needs to be both real and extraordinary at the same time. Or else it's not interesting to watch.
It's the same kind of thing as with mainstream movies. The emotions and the interactions between the actors must look real. But real by itself is not good enough. The interactions between the actors must also be extraordinary in some way in order to be entertaining.
Bobcat
Senior Member

1490 Posts
2/08
Posted - Jan 6 2009 : 12:35PM
I'd sooner watch real women having real sex, in a manner not to dissimilar to what I do with my gf at home.
The fantasy element is that I'm not going to get to have sex with the girl that's in the film. I tend to buy movies based primarily on how attractive I find the girls.
Circus acts don't interest me. Maybe I'm different to most people?
BlackSix All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

pornography wasn't sex but fantasies of an impossibly hospitable world
12377 Posts
9/07
Posted - Jan 6 2009 : 9:15PM
Of course not everyone shares an enthusiasm for Abby Winters but A LOT of people do as it is a very successful company. The AW stuff tends to just be natural looking but cute girls doing more naturalistic sex scenes. However, it is entirely lesbian, I think some b/g stuff in the same style would be a good change of pace.
There are some scenes in Elegant Angel, Evil Angel and even Red Light, directed by Mason, Juan Cuba, Belladonna, Malone, Michael Stefano that capture a more realistic/naturalistic feeling in the sex where it isn't artificially frantic, mechanical and 'porny.'
Stefano said in his podcast that he doesn't want to shoot any girl that doesn't want to kiss in a scene: that is exactly what I'm talking about, injecting some believable passion in the scenes instead of obsessing on formula like facials and DPs. I'd prefer if the girls kept their curves, natural looks and didn't get covered in tatoos, fake n' bake and bad boob jobs.
These complaints have been around for a long time and recent trends over the last 5 years show that directors and producers are either listening to some fans and/or agree and are moving in that direction. If viewers didn't criticize and demand better pornography we'd still be watching crappily shot video with endless close-ups and cutaways to dudes faces.
BlackSix All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

pornography wasn't sex but fantasies of an impossibly hospitable world
12377 Posts
9/07
Posted - Jan 6 2009 : 9:30PM
You're making some broad and sweeping statements about what porn 'needs to be to be' entertaining. It may be true for you but don't assume to speak for everyone else. I would like porn to be more true-to-life because the 'extraordinary' sex in most pornography in no way comes close to the real thing, most of it is banal and boring.
Your comparison to mainstream films is interesting, I'd say we're getting a lot of the porn equivalent to overblown and poorly mounted action films instead of a solid drama or thriller, or hell, even just a well-constructed action film.

Edited by - BlackSix on 1/6/2009 9:30:30 PM

brown_eyed_girl
Member

58 Posts
12/08
Posted - Jan 6 2009 : 11:24PM
^ Exactly.
kristinarose
Member

797 Posts
2/08
Posted - Jan 6 2009 : 11:53PM
Thanks so much for the props ;P I'm always happy to hear when my getting off shines through to the viewer. It's kinda cool.
BWA:14
I got fucked in the pooper by MANUEL! How could I not get off?!?!? He's my fav!
Any girl that doesn't get off having that big giant ween in their crapper is obviously gay.
Dirty Girl:
Sam No let me pick all the performers. It was like Elegant Angel was my wingman minus all the wine & dine and my dates always put out. All the male performers I had worked with before and knew they would fuck me propa'. As for the girlies, come on......You've seen their work, I've seen their work. I knew it would be good and it was.
Clam Digger
Deactivated User

Many a man fails as an original thinker simply because his memory is too good.
2268 Posts
1/05
Posted - Jan 7 2009 : 12:40AM
You feel like that, I suspect, only because you are a hetro-sexual man that truly loves women and is comfortable in your sexuality.
Aplus
Senior Member

1431 Posts
5/05
Posted - Jan 7 2009 : 11:23PM
See that's it right there for me. While there are a few things that turn-me-off, the sex and/or sexual intercourse can pretty much go where it needs to go once some chemistry and passion have been established. Watching a truly aroused woman onscreen is what I most like, and sometimes that takes more than the bare-minimum to get there.
I do think things are changing in those regards at for me. Could be that I just know where to go and who to look for, but things do seem easier these days.
ophelia
Member

82 Posts
1/09
Posted - Jan 14 2009 : 9:40PM
The perfect example of this for me was the Manuel Ferrara/Annette Schwarz scene from Slutwoman 2. That actually made me question my sexuality for a second because I can honestly say I didn't know who I wanted to fuck or be fucked by in that room. It was sex the way I like it. Rough but intimate. Tender at times and then outright brutal at others. The part where he kept making her say she was pretty was.. surprisingly.. I don't even know what the right word is. Intense? You could tell that there was so much trust between them. Their chemistry burned through my screen.
The best part about Manuel for me isn't the size of his cock, but what he does with it. He has the ability to bring immense sensuality out of the other person and it's so hot to watch. I agree that porn needs more intimacy and not just people showing up to earn a buck. Not that anything's wrong with that but this industry is so huge that in can more than facilitate people who want a little more from their adult films than mindless fucking.
MonicaF
Member

136 Posts
10/08
Posted - Jan 14 2009 : 10:13PM
From me experience it all depends upon what the director wants and the chemistry/style of the people in the scene. I've done some scenes to where "wham bam thank you mam" was expected, I've done other scenes to where there was a natural chemistry between myself and my co-star. I've even done scenes to where the chemistry was a bit TOO much and the director told us to "tone it down" - so it all depends.
Fans, why not write in to your favorite porn studios and let them know what YOU want to see? I'll be your input will be valued.
Skyscrapper
Member

667 Posts
12/08
Posted - Jan 14 2009 : 10:29PM
Is drinking copious amounts of sperm natural? If so, I'm willing to donate. To be green, you know.
ntfighter
Member

645 Posts
7/07
Posted - Jan 14 2009 : 11:09PM
Your posts are informative and refreshing. Thanks for your input. Its wonderful to have you here.
I'm shocked, but not surprised to learn that stars are asked to tone it down..

Edited by - ntfighter on 1/14/2009 11:11:50 PM

Clam Digger
Deactivated User

Many a man fails as an original thinker simply because his memory is too good.
2268 Posts
1/05
Posted - Jan 15 2009 : 8:45AM
I used to think that the male performer was secondary (after all I'm a guy) until I first saw Manuel Fererra with Penny Flame in Sports Fucking 4.
Hot chicks do not make hot scenes unless the guy knows how to bring the best out in them, IMHO. A clueless stunt cock can really destroy a scene, no matter who the the female performer is.
Manuel is a lover who adores women and sex and it showsand is why most girls love to do scenes with him.
All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 428porn scenes and natural sexuality

Previous topic: Free Porn Clips
Next topic: They can't do that to her!



Jump To: