Reviewers Recommend
Woodland WankersWoodland Wankers - review by fu_q
Starring: Danny D, Rossa Vaxx. Read review
Participate...

log in
register
Browse...

Etiquette
Active Topics
Popular Topics
Member List
Search
All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 788 > Porn Stars on Bill O'reilly again
AuthorPost
SEARGANT SHARP
Member


216 Posts
8/02
Posted - Nov 19 2002 : 5:04PM
Another Pornstar was on O'reilly factor and this
time it was Calli Cox. What got O'reilly riled up
this time was that they were going to film a porn
flick with taxpayers money. Yea I couldn't believe
it either but it appears that Jill Kelly productions
were going to film on a college campus at a fraternity.
And the college takes federal and state tax money.
And Calli Cox was there defending Jill Kelly and
also star in the production. The campus was pleading
ignorance that they didn't know JK was going to film on
campus.But JK was passing out leaflets looking for students
to be in the film. Bill wasn't buying it and neither do I
but Calli did a desent job defending JK but Bill didn't
go after the jugular either. If you want to see Calli it
will probably reair it this weekend.


[Link]
Bill All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

5334 Posts
6/00
Posted - Nov 19 2002 : 8:03PM
Typical O'Reilly logic. How doe he equate using a frat house as a location with the movie spending taxpayer money? What taxpayer money was spent?
Go To Top of page
[Link]
SEARGANT SHARP
Member

216 Posts
8/02
Posted - Nov 19 2002 : 11:50PM
I supppose that the frathouse was built with taxpayers
money and that Jill kelly productions filming at the
frathouse ipso facto using taxpayers money.Just like
some colleges that don't take tax money they don't
have to abide buy alot of regulations.
Go To Top of page
[Link]
Clay
Member

216 Posts
8/00
Posted - Nov 20 2002 : 1:02AM
Fraternities are private organizations that absolutely do not use state or federal funding. It should be obvious that federally funded organizations cannot be single gender societies that arbitrarily deny membership to individuals (you have to be a fraternity, sorority, or private golf club to do that). O'reilly is just an idiot who needs to learn to think, read, or listen a little before talking.

Edited by - clay on 11/20/2002 1:02:56 AM

Go To Top of page
[Link]
headbanger
Member

48 Posts
10/02
Posted - Nov 20 2002 : 1:41AM
Bill had a similar topic on the other day that I happened to catch flipping through. I believe it was a S&M convention held at U of Arizona that was being subsidized by the state government as educational. They were also granted use of the school facilities and halls for various booths such as how to become a porn star, etc. I don't know what all the fuss was about? I'd consider that a valid college curriculum
Go To Top of page
[Link]
 
Bill All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

5334 Posts
6/00
Posted - Nov 20 2002 : 8:32PM
Even if the frathouse was built with taxpayer money, that would be incorrect logic. The difference in the amount of taxpayer money spent if there wasn't a porn movie shot there would be exactly the same amount of money spent if there were a porn movie shot there. If there was no incremental money spent, then there the porn movie was not shot using taxpayer money.
Go To Top of page
[Link]
basementchild
Member

52 Posts
9/02
Posted - Nov 26 2002 : 5:49PM
I believe that it is the position of the university administration that Jill Kelly et al are guilty of sexual abuse! I'm sure the students were gluttons for punishment!

BC

Go To Top of page
[Link]
skronker
Notable Legendary Icon

Scopophiliac
9780 Posts
9/02
Posted - Nov 28 2002 : 2:14AM
O'Reilly's a pompous ass who's just reaching for something sensational to keep his ratings going. But since he also is a *dick*, the topic of porn is oddly appropriate.
Go To Top of page
[Link]
All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 788Porn Stars on Bill O'reilly again

Previous topic: All I want for Xmas is a moulded, rubber pussy (topic moved)
Next topic: Virtual Sex - opinions



Jump To: