Featured New Release
Box cover for Livestream Wet Dream 2
Livestream Wet Dream 2
Studio: PornFidelity
Release date: 7/28/2026


all new releases
All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 278 > Porn Tubes off limits
AuthorPost
oldguy
Senior Member

1270 Posts
3/06
Posted - Aug 4 2012 : 5:48PM
I can certainly understand why porn tubes are off limits on this site but we are not naive enough to think that members do not go to them. Most of us cannot afford too many DVD's from the legitimate porn producers thus we frequent them from time to time especially when we need visual aids to get off or to view our favorite stars.
Any helpful hints on how to break this habit as we sincerely do not want to short change members that are porn producers, directors, actors, etc.
Bill All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

5334 Posts
6/00
Posted - Aug 4 2012 : 6:59PM
Rent DVD's.
pat362
Senior Member

10078 Posts
3/10
Posted - Aug 4 2012 : 9:47PM
Join Videobox. It's only 15$ a month and you get access to thousands of videos. You even get 29 videos of your favorite girl Shayla Laveaux so what more could you ask for?
There are always going to be reasons to justify using tube sites for your porn fix but none of them is any better than the other and all of them are why the porn industry is where it is. Here`s something to think about. If tube sites had been around when Shayla started doing porn then I can assure you that you wouldn't have as many movies with her in them if any.
Bill All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

5334 Posts
6/00
Posted - Aug 4 2012 : 11:43PM
Another option is to join FyreTV.
angryassdrummer
Member

559 Posts
3/11
Posted - Aug 4 2012 : 11:52PM
when i speak to people ( men and women) asking about porn its always the same answer... they all watch it on free tube sites
so we can pretend on this site like they dont exist but in reality thats how 99% of people watch porn
no one is going to pay for it if they dont have to.. no one feels sorry for a porn producer that they are not getting their money
i have spent thousands on porn since i was a teen and refuse to spend one single more cent on it.
 
ninja1
Senior Member

2939 Posts
1/08
Posted - Aug 5 2012 : 12:10AM
The site rules are to not post tubesite links or promote tubesites. That's quite a different thing than pretending they don't exist. Surely you can comprehend the difference. I doubt it's 99%. Tubesites are quite crappy; I doubt that 99% of people could put up with the crappiness of tubesites as their only way to get porn, on a permanent basis. Eventually they will grow up and want to see high-quality picture and have some control over what they are getting.
deusnova
Member

54 Posts
1/12
Posted - Aug 5 2012 : 1:55AM
^
That's a good point, but then you have the issue of torrents.
Jambavant
Member

82 Posts
10/10
Posted - Aug 5 2012 : 7:10AM
Meh, same old talk since 1996.
Internet has changed everything, and we have a hard time adapting so everyone can reap the benefits.
I really don't mind piracy, but I cannot stand people thinking it's ok not to spend money on legal content. Download whatever you want, but spend some.
Back on the subject, some internet sites advertize their videos on tubesites, so not all videos on tubesites are illegal. Some are just as legal as galleries. But then I understand it would take too much time to mod, and people would eventually abuse the system...
pat362
Senior Member

10078 Posts
3/10
Posted - Aug 5 2012 : 8:04AM
^Actually they are all bad and the fact that some sites have to advertise some of their content on tube sites in the hope that someone who's cheap enough to use these sites will dish out a few bucks to get access to the rest of the content is the proof. You don't need a tube site to tell you if the content on a particular site is any good since most of them already offer you plenty of previews on their own site.
Legitimate porn sites have to advertise on the very tube sites that stole their content simply to make a few measly dollars from partner prorgams and what not. That Doesn't make the tube site any less illegal? It just makes them that much more evil.
Draxxx
Senior Member

3831 Posts
2/07
Posted - Aug 5 2012 : 10:31AM
More and more sites have actually stopped showing previews as time goes on. I use the "UP COMING RELEASES" section of this site to see what new movies are coming out and even with the major companies more and more of them have stopped offering previews of their movies. There was one site I used to buy DVDs from that offered previews from various studios that offered them and the last few months they've stopped doing that because there aren't that many doing it anymore. Sites like BRAZZERS and others offer previews of scenes but not of their DVDs. I still buy DVDs and I'm not a member of their site or plan to join so showing me a clip of a scene is nice I suppose but it doesn't help me with DVD purchases.
It's not that black and white or cut and dry. I'm totally against using tube sites as a substitute for buying porn but I think it could be a useful tool to help consumers make choices for buying porn. There's a tube site I occasionally go to to check out a new girl I run across to get a feel of what type of performer she is or how her look might've changed over time. I only watch a few minutes of a couple of clips to get a vibe on her. I don't like watching movies or any videoes that last more than a few minutes on my computer. I've bought movies based on what I've seen on that site. On my ROKU there's a bundle of free tube sites that I check out from time to time. Some are clearly ad sites because at the start of each clip there's an ad for the company beforethe clip starts and the clip is usually less than 5 minutes long. Some of the others may show the whole scene but the quality varies. Some look fine, some look horrible.
I mostly just watch the clips for stuff I'm not able to buy or find. Like fisting, Japanese stuff, and other stuff that isn't typical US porn sold on DVD. I'll probably start buying or at least try out some of the DANCING BEAR type porn because of what I've seen on those sites because for some reason I find that strangely entertaining. But I would've never seen that stuff if not for a those tube sites.
So for people like me who only the tube sites as a preview tool there's nothing really wrong with them. Some of them aren't meant to be anything other than that and that's why they don't have the whole scene up and the quailty is just good enough to allow you to see what's happening. The real problem with tube sites is when people decide they're going to use it as a substitute for not buying porn. They try justify it by saying stuff like "Today's porn sucks and isn't worth the money" or "I don't have money to buy porn" or whatever lame excuse they can come up with to justify what they know is wrong. I don't even think it's that bad if a person watches tube site stuff as an addition to the stuff they buy but the people who just refuse to buy or pay for any content are the ones who are killing the porn biz.
LCF All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

Non Prevalebunt!
10364 Posts
1/05
Posted - Aug 5 2012 : 10:35AM
This site isn't ignoring the existence of tube sites or torrents or whatever, quite the contrary it is very well aware of them and the way they affect the business that ultimately fed and still feeds this site itself.
This site do not want to help them to do more damage than that they already did avoiding any addressing to them from here.
Actually we all know that most of the times people here asks for ID of actresses just to have a proper name and to find more stolen content , yet we pretend not to know that and VERY kindly give them an answer , after all there are those who actually want to know to get legal content from legitimate sellers , they are few yet they exist.
In short you won't point out the location of a bank to a robber , would you?
utopiaa
Member

610 Posts
7/11
Posted - Aug 5 2012 : 11:13AM
The video quality on tube sites can be quite bad, dont really matter of the older scenes i guess. Many seems to want HD, but seems many are happy with not so good quality too.
Sometimes i think what kinda my porn paysite would be if i ever created one :) One idea i been thinking is what would happen if porn sites would offer the lower quality ( say 240p oe 360p ) version for free when streamed, possibly with some adds, and if you pay for membership you could get the fullHD one and download the scene.. That way you could get some income atleast, as it would most likely end up in internet somewhere. Then those who want better quality could pay for it. Don't know if that would work tought.
Edited by - utopiaa on 8/5/2012 11:15:22 AM
ninja1
Senior Member

2939 Posts
1/08
Posted - Aug 5 2012 : 12:05PM
If tubesites were so "helpful" why are so many people posting (or wanting/attempting to post) tubesite links here at ADT, in an effort to identify some girl or some scene they saw on a tubesite. If tubesites were on the up-and-up and steering people to purchase porn, they would be providing all the pertinent information (performer names, DVD title, studio etc.) about all those clips.
T0MBOne
Senior Member

1200 Posts
5/08
Posted - Aug 5 2012 : 4:36PM
Write reviews for ADT. Plenty of titles on the ol' screener list for you (or others) to choose from.
Edited by - T0MBOne on 8/5/2012 4:37:08 PM
ukmg
Member

65 Posts
11/10
Posted - Aug 5 2012 : 5:33PM
What I don't get is the (alleged) repeated and systematic illegal use of content by the big boys of the industry. Assuming the allegations have merit, is it the sheer relative size/strength which prevents appropriate action being taken?
ukmg
 
LCF All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

Non Prevalebunt!
10364 Posts
1/05
Posted - Aug 5 2012 : 6:00PM
^
action have been taken for example some sites get shut down often file sharing sites get closed regularly , last of them Oron from august first who already had a lawsuit on July 4 but managed to deal by giving all the names and address of his customers and other data about them useful to identify them and their traffic, then another lawsuit reached them along with hotfile , filesonic and fileserve although these two were already closed for sharing since the megaupload affair last year.Oron was closed a week ago it has been active eleven years.
It is unclear the position of Rapidshare it has been mentioned but it is based in Germany so an American lawsuit has no effect on it
Interesting thing oron owns some sites where people share links to download so its shut down may lead to the shutdown of many sites , Oron also used an aggressive marketing strategy so that forced many to use its server and banning competitors so that its closure will lead to a major loss of shared material
not a bad thing

Edited by - Laurie Cameron Fan on 8/5/2012 6:06:01 PM

Seijuro
Senior Member

1389 Posts
12/09
Posted - Aug 5 2012 : 7:13PM
I have a hard time finding good deals on DVDs because few to no online stores ship to Memphis.
pat362
Senior Member

10078 Posts
3/10
Posted - Aug 5 2012 : 9:08PM
I was only thinking about internet content sites and not dvd sites. All the ones that I'm aware of offer a trailer for their more recent updates.
The first problem with your argument is that many tube sites screw up the video info so that you can't rely on it. Case in point is all the tube site guys that keep posting a new thread asking one of us to identify a girl or scene.
The second pronblem is that I don't think most guys are like you and only visit tube sites to see a particularly new girls scene. I'd also like to add that if the new girl is already on the tube sites then that's another example of why they are so bad for the industry. Seeing a 10 years old scene on a tube site is one thing but seeing a brand new one is quite another.
Goldstein All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

"You have sacrificed nothing and no one."
3689 Posts
8/10
Posted - Aug 5 2012 : 10:32PM
Internet Pirates Will Always Win
News Analysis
By NICK BILTON
August 4, 2012
STOPPING online piracy is like playing the world’s largest game of Whac-A-Mole.
Hit one, countless others appear. Quickly. And the mallet is heavy and slow.
Take as an example YouTube, where the Recording Industry Association of America almost rules with an iron fist, but doesn’t, because of deceptions like the one involving a cat.
YouTube, which is owned by Google, offers a free tool to the movie studios and television networks called Content ID. When a studio legitimately uploads a clip from a copyrighted film to YouTube, the Google tool automatically finds and blocks copies of the product.
To get around this roadblock, some YouTube users started placing copyrighted videos inside a still photo of a cat that appears to be watching an old JVC television set. The Content ID algorithm has a difficult time seeing that the video is violating any copyright rules; it just sees a cat watching TV.
Sure, it’s annoying for those who want to watch the video, but it works. (Obviously, it’s more than annoying for the company whose product is being pirated.)
Then there are those — possibly tens of millions of users, actually — who engage in peer-to-peer file-sharing on the sites using the BitTorrent protocol.
Earlier this year, after months of legal wrangling, authorities in a number of countries won an injunction against the Pirate Bay, probably the largest and most famous BitTorrent piracy site on the Web. The order blocked people from entering the site.
In retaliation, the Pirate Bay wrapped up the code that runs its entire Web site, and offered it as a free downloadable file for anyone to copy and install on their own servers. People began setting up hundreds of new versions of the site, and the piracy continues unabated.
Thus, whacking one big mole created hundreds of smaller ones.
Although the recording industries might believe they’re winning the fight, the Pirate Bay and others are continually one step ahead. In March, a Pirate Bay collaborator, who goes by the online name Mr. Spock, announced in a blog post that the team hoped to build drones that would float in the air and allow people to download movies and music through wireless radio transmitters.
“This way our machines will have to be shut down with aeroplanes in order to shut down the system,” Mr. Spock posted on the site. “A real act of war.” Some BitTorrent sites have also discussed storing servers in secure bank vaults. Message boards on the Web devoted to piracy have in the past raised the idea that the Pirate Bay has Web servers stored underwater.
“Piracy won’t go away,” said Ernesto Van Der Sar, editor of Torrent Freak, a site that reports on copyright and piracy news. “They’ve tried for years and they’ll keep on trying, but it won’t go away.” Mr. Van Der Sar said companies should stop trying to fight piracy and start experimenting with new ways to distribute content that is inevitably going to be pirated anyway.
According to Torrent Freak, the top pirated TV shows are downloaded several million times a week. Unauthorized movies, music, e-books, software, pornography, comics, photos and video games are watched, read and listened to via these piracy sites millions of times a day.
The copyright holders believe new laws will stop this type of piracy. But many others believe any laws will just push people to find creative new ways of getting the content they want.
“There’s a clearly established relationship between the legal availability of material online and copyright infringement; it’s an inverse relationship,” said Holmes Wilson, co-director of Fight for the Future, a nonprofit technology organization that is trying to stop new piracy laws from disrupting the Internet. “The most downloaded television shows on the Pirate Bay are the ones that are not legally available online.”
The hit HBO show “Game of Thrones” is a quintessential example of this. The show is sometimes downloaded illegally more times each week than it is watched on cable television. But even if HBO put the shows online, the price it could charge would still pale in comparison to the money it makes through cable operators. Mr. Wilson believes that the big media companies don’t really want to solve the piracy problem.
“If every TV show was offered at a fair price to everyone in the world, there would definitely be much less copyright infringement,” he said. “But because of the monopoly power of the cable companies and content creators, they might actually make less money.”
The way people download unauthorized content is changing. In the early days of music piracy, people transferred songs to their home or work computers. Now, with cloud-based sites, like Wuala, uTorrent and Tribler, people stream movies and music from third-party storage facilities, often to mobile devices and TV’s. Some of these cloud-based Web sites allow people to set up automatic downloads of new shows the moment they are uploaded to piracy sites. It’s like piracy-on-demand. And it will be much harder to trace and to stop.
It is only going to get worse. Piracy has started to move beyond the Internet and media and into the physical world. People on the fringes of tech, often early adopters of new devices and gadgets, are now working with 3-D printers that can churn out actual physical objects. Say you need a wall hook or want to replace a bit of hardware that fell off your luggage. You can download a file and “print” these objects with printers that spray layers of plastic, metal or ceramics into shapes.
And people are beginning to share files that contain the schematics for physical objects on these BitTorrent sites. Although 3-D printing is still in its infancy, it is soon expected to become as pervasive as illegal music downloading was in the late 1990s.
Content owners will find themselves stuck behind ancient legal walls when trying to stop people from downloading objects online as copyright laws do not apply to standard physical objects deemed “noncreative.”
In the arcade version of Whac-A-Mole, the game eventually ends — often when the player loses. In the piracy arms-race version, there doesn’t seem to be a conclusion. Sooner or later, the people who still believe they can hit the moles with their slow mallets might realize that their time would be better spent playing an entirely different game.
Nick Bilton is a technology columnist for The New York Times.
Draxxx
Senior Member

3831 Posts
2/07
Posted - Aug 6 2012 : 12:19AM
The ones I'm thinking of have watermarks to identify what studio made the clip. The don't usually identify the girl or specific scene. Since I don't care about that info I never gave it much thought. When I watch agirl on a tube site it's just to see what kind of perfomance she does in order to help me decide on whether to buy stuff with her in it. I'm totally aware that most people are watching those clips with no intention to ever buy anything. Just wishful thinking on my part that there are at least some people who use the tube sites as a helpful buying tool.
When I say "new" girl it often means a girl who's "new" to me. More often than not I'm looking at girls who've been in the porn biz for years but flew under my radar.
But the tube sites are certainly doing far more harm than good. I just don't think there anyway to stop piracy without the government getting involved and I'm not too keen on the government getting involved with porn in any capacity. There just too many people who feel it's perfectly okay to put that content on the web and even more people who feel it's okay and even their right to watch it for free. I expect that type of behavior from kids when it comes to music but I'm disappointed adults who should know better and particularly real porn fans would do that. I'm sure most people have their excuses and justifications for doing it but it doesn't matter because they're all aware of how it's hurting the porn biz.
Goldstein All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

"You have sacrificed nothing and no one."
3689 Posts
8/10
Posted - Aug 6 2012 : 12:01PM
One thing I always find fascinating is that, whenever you do Google searches for stars and titles, the overwhelming number of returns are always for tubesites and stolen content.
In fact, legitimate returns (e.g. vendors, studios, performer's sites) are few and far in between.
Internet search engines are the tail wagging the dog here.
And, they are driving more-and-more visitors to illegal content.
Perhaps, legitimate industry sites need to employ tactics to improve their page rankings?
(And, I don't mean the kind of crap where generic non-porn related searches take you to porn sites.)
There are companies that offer to improve your web-page rankings.
Are they legitimate, and do they work?
Edited by - Goldstein on 8/6/2012 12:01:27 PM
mharris127
Senior Member

1844 Posts
8/09
Posted - Aug 6 2012 : 11:02PM
As for tubes, I noticed that there were lots of sites that I did not recognize offering free copies of porn when I did a search for Peter Acworth's (owner of Kink.com) social media accounts (Google+, Tumblr, etc.). I didn't check any of them but very strongly suspect these sites with unrecognizable site addresses were tubes or torrents of some sort. I then did a search of Harmony Rose (retired Kink and Naughty America performer) and almost all of the links were of what I suspect to be tubes and torrents offering free scenes. I would bet if I searched a better known performer such as Bree Olson or Sasha Grey, Google would choke on all of the tube site listings due to the large amount of them!
As for improving web-page rankings I understand that was possible ten to fifteen years ago but is very difficult if not impossible to do now.
killbillvol69 All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

^Lucy Pinder
18631 Posts
4/08
Posted - Aug 6 2012 : 11:24PM
^ I find that if I want to search for a performer or a movie and for some reason I need to use google, I have to include in my searches "-torrent" to avoid all the torrents, "-tube" to avoid all the tube sites, and still I have to go several pages deep in the search results before finally coming across something that isn't some sort of illegal download option.
It's crazy. There must be some way of making all the illegal sites show up last, rather than first.
Goldstein All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

"You have sacrificed nothing and no one."
3689 Posts
8/10
Posted - Aug 7 2012 : 7:24AM
Ay, there's the rub...
They show up first because they get the most page views [o\|]
pat362
Senior Member

10078 Posts
3/10
Posted - Aug 7 2012 : 8:02AM
^True and if Google really gave a crap or was forced to give a crap then they would be the last ones to appear. Goggle is as guilty as the owners of the tube sites.
 
Dan
Senior Member

2056 Posts
6/07
Posted - Aug 7 2012 : 8:10AM
I think the trick is for legitimate companies to take advantage of the situation rather than fight it.
A good example is the trailer from Big Wet Asses 21. The company that made the film has released a free trailer of it for everyone to watch for free. This trailer shows some pretty good sex, probably some of the best moments in the movie. But it doesn't show you how the couple got to those best moments. You need to buy the movie to see the whole thing.
I think this trailer from Big Wet Asses 21 hooks a lot of people into buying the film. Not everyone who watches the free trailer buys the film, but most of those who don't buy probably wouldn't have bought it anyway. They are the people who either can't afford to spend money on porn, or their interest is lukewarm, not enough to buy porn films.
And releasing porn movies on DVDs might not be such a good idea anymore. This is old technology, and it doesn't work so well in terms of copyright protection. It's much harder to copy video content from streaming video sites, such www.firstanalquest.com for example. All the porn company need to do is advertise its streaming video content widely, with links for people to click on.

Goldstein All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

"You have sacrificed nothing and no one."
3689 Posts
8/10
Posted - Aug 7 2012 : 10:16AM
^ Thing is, I won't pay money for streaming video sites, period.
If I can't buy the DVD, or download DVD-quality (or better) video files with no DRM schemes, I have no interest in spending money on it.
Porn is important to me.
I want to physically possess and own my porn.
If I can't possess and own my porn, I am no longer a porn consumer.
Surely, the desire to keep the little fucks with the black fingernail polish from stealing content -- content they will never pay for, ever -- can be balanced with providing content to people like me who actually pay for it?
I'm a "buy" sexual :)
I can't be the only one who feels this way.
Rosco Fuji
Deactivated User

On the licking stick, Mr. Magic Dick!
3309 Posts
2/09
Posted - Aug 7 2012 : 4:43PM
I really don't think Google's top priority is worrying about porn tube sites though.
JohnW
Senior Member

1351 Posts
6/08
Posted - Aug 7 2012 : 6:22PM
That sums it up, even though I don't think he's right on all accounts.
The current battle is lost. Piracy will not go away, it will probably just become worse. I've said this before but things have changed. The old model doesn't work anymore. No matter how much you enforce it, no matter how many teens or single moms you imprison. It doesn't matter how much it sucks for producers, performers, musicians, etc. It's just a matter of fact in the world we are living in. Content produced might be worse for it, people will lose their jobs, and much crap will follow... But again, that's how it is. Fight it all you want and I'm not blaming anyone, but I think it is time to move on from denial to acceptance of the new reality. [/rant]
fevrinnn
Member

42 Posts
6/12
Posted - Aug 7 2012 : 6:23PM
No, i dont think anyones is apart from those who try and make money by selling porn. I just typed 'porn' into google and and the first page of results is all tubesites. I mean, every single one. It's the way of the world these days. Outside of people who read sites like this, most people wont know there exists any disgruntlement towards them.
Draxxx
Senior Member

3831 Posts
2/07
Posted - Aug 7 2012 : 9:23PM
I have some questions...
I've heard at least a time or two that features tend to be pirated less than typical scenes of Gonzo porn. Is that true? I have noticed that at least on the couple of tube sites I've been on I don't recall seeing any scenes from a feature (or at least I couldn't tell if they were).
I've also noticed that I've never seen a DIGITAL PLAYGROUND scene on a tube site (or at least I didn't recognize it if it were). There does seem to be some companies that don't get pirated as much. Why is that?
How do movies/scenes end up on the web before the movie comes out? I saw links to the Octomom movie before it was released. Who's posting content before it hits the stores?
What's the difference between a tube site and a torrents site? I've never been on a torrent siate to my knowledge. Are tube sites more legit than torrents? Most tube sites don't seem to be hiding and offer membership.
Harri Patel
Senior Member

#SDNY he's all yours. -- Michael Steele
5110 Posts
3/03
Posted - Aug 8 2012 : 1:37AM
The great majority of those posts are from new accounts. I think that they're almost all phony, made by tubesite employees trying to send traffic to their sites. If I were running this place, I would nuke those threads as soon as they are started, not have the mods waste their time explaining the "no tubesite links" policy over and over.
BlackSix All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

pornography wasn't sex but fantasies of an impossibly hospitable world
12377 Posts
9/07
Posted - Aug 8 2012 : 1:55AM
There are some scenes and even whole movies on tube sites but they're not nearly as popular as the gonzo stuff.
Some companies are more active in 'requesting' that their material be removed. Some of the tube sites are owned by certain porn companies and they are a lot quicker to remove their own content when it is posted rather than their competitors.
I assume those are from advance screeners sent out for review or promo.
Neither are legit. Torrent sites allow you to download the whole film or scenes in higher quality either as an avi or similar file or as a DVD-R. You generally have to be a member. Most of the major porn torrent sites have been closed down recently although someone usually steps in to take their place, not sure if that's happened recently.
@Goldstein, I watch a lot of xxx VOD on adultempire.com, moviemonster.com and hotmovies.com. Full length features or gonzo videos are often available for download DRM-free on adultempire.com in usually quite high quality.
Harri Patel
Senior Member

#SDNY he's all yours. -- Michael Steele
5110 Posts
3/03
Posted - Aug 8 2012 : 1:56AM
A torrent site doesn't deliver a movie to a browser window on your computer. It offers you a file to download which in turn enables you to download the movie in dribs and drabs from other people all over the internet who already have the complete movie on their computers, and, optionally, enables you to allow other people to take dribs and drabs of the movie from your computer.
Neither technology is inherently more legit. Either the material is being distributed in a way that is contrary to someone's intellectual property rights (which is usually, but not always, the case), or it isn't.
Katvena
Member

Rocco & Nacho are the KINGS OF HARDCORE and yes I am a Red Blooded WOMAN
402 Posts
8/12
Posted - Sep 23 2012 : 9:31PM
You are so right about that. If you want free porn you have too put up with bad video quality.
 
pat362
Senior Member

10078 Posts
3/10
Posted - Sep 24 2012 : 8:37PM
^Actually if you want free porn then people like me and others who pay for porn will have to flip the bill.



Jump To: