Well like we were discussing in other threads, it's that unknown third and fourth generation list of people that AIM is very concerned about. They can't track down all that information fast enough so they are advising all production to cease immediately.
CHATSWORTH, Calif. - While appreciating the financial burden that a moratorium on production places upon the entire industry, we see no other recourse considering the dire consequences of not doing so.
While the first-generation has been identified and quarantined, and AIM is rapidly creating a quarantine list for the second-generation, there is no doubt that there is already a third- and even fourth-generation in the outbreak.
The third- and fourth-generation is not being quarantined; AIM simply can’t track down that many people fast enough.
Thus we recommend that all adult companies cease production, or at the minimum shoot condom-only productions, until all women who have worked with Darren James since his last negative test, known as the “first-generation” have cleared. That will be on June 8, 2004.
In addition, we recommend that any woman who has performed with Darren James since Feb. 25 contact AIM. Most women in this category will have already passed their 30-day window, but as AIM’s Dr. Sharon Mitchell stated this morning there is a 60-day window before a person who has had sex with an HIV-positive partner can be 99 percent certain that infection has not occurred.
James is believed to have caught the virus while in Brazil around March 10, and later today AIM should be able to give a “guesstimate” of when that happened based on further tests on the amount of antibodies in James’ blood.
This is about the lives of our friends, our family, and our peers. While it is highly unlikely, it is possible that every performer in the adult industry could have HIV by this point. If you are talent and choose to work, your putting your life and also anyone with whom you have any form of sexual contact your partner’s at risk.
If you are a production company that hires talent that becomes infected with HIV during one of your productions – you may be found liable. Think about that when you’re looking at your balance sheets and your conscience. You will definitely lose two months worth of production, but you could lose your entire company and live out your life knowing you contributed to someone’s death for your profit.
Another consideration is that the government is watching the manner in which the adult industry handles this very closely.
The specter of regulation still looms over our shoulders and if the state deems that we, as an industry, handled this situation in an irresponsible manner, then this could be the final straw. That means condom-only forever.
There are two companies, Vivid Video and Wicked Pictures, which have been producing condom-only videos for some time in the face of market demand for videos without condoms. Their decision to place the safety of their performers above their profit should be commended; it should also serve as an example.
Tim Connelly, publisher of AVN adds, “If you are a performer in the adult industry at this moment, your body could very well be a deadly weapon and if you are a production company you are potentially putting innocent people in the line of fire. Some may consider this business a high wire act for performers, but there’s no reason to play Russian Roulette for the sake of another porn scene.”
A well-known & widely used Porn Stud Darren James testing HIV Positive Is The Single Biggest News & Issue To Hit Porn Valley since the Marc Wallice fiasco.
No telling how bad the XXX Industry will be affected by this both financially & viscerally.
As much as I abhor seeing condoms in my porno, I'm beginning to have some second thoughts. Porn with condoms is tolerable.
Porn as we know it will never be the same again...
"Porn as we know it will never be the same again..."
I think that is a bit of an alarmist thing to say. I would say that the industry as we knew it last week may never been seen again, but come on. The companies are all about the bottom line and once this has all passed they will get back to making money. If everyone thinks about the business as a whole and not about themselves as a producer, then this should be handled in a manner that does not require government intervention. If that happens, how do we know that once the craze has disipated and production has returned back to normal that companies won't just go right back to non-condom anals, dps, dvs, daps, and creampies?
I'm sure people said that the industry would never be the same again after the Marc Wallace incident. How long did that last?
Of course, if the government does get involved then everything is a variable.
But I do agree on one thing: I am definitely re-thinking my opinions on condoms as a consumer. Condoms never bothered me, but bareback scenes were usually a little more exciting for me. And to be completely honest if something crazy happens and we get a huge condom use increase in all of porn I wouldn't mind. No one should have to go through potentially fatal diseases just so we can all get off.
Hey. Time will tell. All we need is a little patience.
For the immediate future, yeah things will change. But I am thinking that best case scenario, as far as health and keeping the government at bay, things will be back to normal years down the road. Never say forever. It's all just temporary.
Just my jaded view and please don't read it as being callous. This is all horrible, horrible news and one can't help but feel sick and worried for these people.
This could very easily be the end of whatever the current cycle has been. It's gonna put some people out of business. A lot of players are going to leave the business (mostly the youngsters, whose familes are going flip out bigtime and bankroll college tuition for the next 10 years if necessary). If it spreads out beyond the second line into the third line of major porn studs, then it's seriously going to wipe the slate. There's certainly the chance, too, that a lockdown will clear out any specific cases and that things can return to biz-as-usual, but I mean if guys like Mark Davis, Brian Pumper or Surewood get taken down, you're looking at some major shit. Because think of all the gals they fuck on a day-to-day basis. I don't know how the risk factors work, but maybe there's a good chance no one else got infected ... but based on the Marc Wallice scenario, and figure in how much rougher the sex is these days, with all the internal cumshots and ass-ripping action, and there's no reason to expect that it will be any different. Keep your fingers crossed.
though everything should be done to shelter everyone involved, i have to say don't magnify this incident to the end of the world.
saying that it is possible every single talent is infected by now is fuel to the flames of hysteria. and does present a very(!) distorted view of reality.
so keep calm, and wait till the testing delivers results.
i have to say it disturbs me when i read all these sensational shouts, and smartasses emerging from nowhere...
that being said my thoughts and prays are with you all during this hard time.
[Link]
*Mutt* Deactivated User
752 Posts 8/03
Posted - Apr 14 2004 : 8:24PM
I didn't write that post, it came from AVN. They are trying to impress on people how potentially catastrophic this could get if people don't take it dead serious.
X-Ray- I pretty much concur with your statement. This is surely bad, but let's not panic. Now is time to comfort those directly effected and merely wait to see what happens to the industry.
Drew, we had this conversation just last night in the "STD's in Porn" thread. On the AIM website, it says Sharon Mitchell has a Ph.D. in Human Sexuality from a place called the Institute for the Advanced Study of Human Sexuality in San Francisco.
There's seems to be some confusion when people hear her refered to as Dr. Mitchell, they think she is a medical doctor. For some reason, I was under the impression that she had a doctorate in public health, but I was wrong about that.
Does anyone know where AIM sends their blood samples to have the HIV test done, or do they do the test themselves? It doesn't list this information on their website.
Hmmm.... sounds like a degree in P.E., or whatever big-college athletics use. Not impressive.AVN's suggestion that all production stop for two months is ludicrous ... unless AIM is their own lab.
I think such labs must be licensed. I'm reluctant to place too much faith in such certification but it's hard to believe they'd certify a lab whose chief had a PhD in Sex.
I believe they should use two labs, rotating tests between them, to avoid problems at one lab.
but no matter who does the testing and who says what..it makes sence to stop shooting, or to limit shooting, because otherwise you might be working with a 3rd generation person, who actually was one of the unlucky few who didnt know she or he is 3rd generation and has hiv? scary! Also i have a question, here in Europe yo do the test, but if you really think something might be wrong, you have to count from the last time you had sex 6months, and after those 6 months then is when you know a 100% if you are clear or not. How does that work in US? I mean if you test every month like most of us, i am sure there is no problem, but if you had sex with for example a 1st or whatever generation, you would have to wait 6 months before you are sure. Just a thought, on a set, there was a guy from a 2nd generation , he had sex with a girl, who later had sex whith another guy. Thats already 2 more people who are at risk am i right? Without them knowing.
I had assumed that given a week or two AIM would be able to make a good contact graph. I'm told that's not necessarily true: it may never be possible to do a trustworthy chain of contact, even with Darren's help.
In that case the only way would be to make a list of provable no-contact, and that list will be short indeed.
Terri asked:Yes, that's right. But multiply it by the number of 2nd generation guys, and the number of scenes they have done. Also, a lot of scenes are a guy and two girls, or a girl and three guys. And then figure out who they are all doing after hours. That's why tracking it becomes a nightmare. Outside the industry, there aren't records of who did who. They don't always get the names.
This is all horrible. Hardcoregossip.com posted an on-set report from "Hustler's Barely Legal Summer Camp 2" yesterday. The cast was filled with girls I like right now, such as Jennifer Luv and Kimberly Kane. And the first scene of the day was Kimberly Kane and Steven St. Croix. It all sounds great and the two seem to have put in a strong scene but then Devan interrupts his report to say that after that scene was wrapped news of the unfolding crisis reached the set and they cancelled the rest of the scenes. What Devan didn't seem to know when he wrote this and clearly what Kimberly and Steven had absolutely no way of knowing is that Steven's name is now on the 2nd generation list. According to AIM, the guys on the 2nd generation list have a 1% chance of being infected if one of the girls on the 1st generation list tests positive. However, there is still that chance. And I guess that means that Kimberly is now on the 3rd generation list or do I also somewhat misunderstand this?
I realize that people are going to really be in a financial bind for the duration of this crisis and I understand the reasoning coming from companies who seem to have no intention of actually shutting down until June 8th and just waiting for the lists to be complete until they start filming. However, cautiousness is the best choice here, even if it means over-cautious. News is that right now JKP is the only company who has informed AIM that they will cease production until June 8th. There needs to be more companies like them.
Poor Turkey running for her life with Christmas Hat 3713 Posts 9/01
Posted - Apr 15 2004 : 11:28AM
Hope there is no more cases and everybody will turn out fine. This is especially so for the Euro babes who may have shot with any of the 2nd generation talent as they may not have access to the medication available for the US talents.
I am sure that many producers have a backlog and can stop shooting for a while to make sure everyone is healthy.
Ron
[Link]
nietzsche Deactivated User
5470 Posts 8/03
Posted - Apr 15 2004 : 11:31AM
Somebody clear something up for me. How long is the period between exposure leading to HIV and the ability to infect others.
"I am sure that many producers have a backlog and can stop shooting for a while to make sure everyone is healthy."
That's what I am thinking too. I understand how hard this is going to be on the performers, but the companies are a completely different case. The more I am reading the more it seems that none of these companies have any intention of shutting down until June 8th. They all just want to start shooting again once AIM has fully compiled a list of 2nd generation and 3rd generation. I understand that and on some level it makes sense, but it is also too much of a chance to take. If someone tests positive in that 1st list then everything moves up a level and complicates things even more. When I started the other thread about this, entitled 60 Day Moratorium, I was fully thinking that most companies would just shut down or at least use condoms if they choose to continue shooting. That does not appear to be the case. Why? Most of the big companies surely have a backlot of material they can simply turn to and edit together for new product. They're not the ones who should be worried about money anyway. The performers are the ones who have valid reasons to worry about that now.
Yes, she has an indirect chain of contact through him.
The actual odds of exposure depend greatly on things like anal/non-anal and other things (sore or cuts, etc). Trying to estimate the odds for someone with indirect exposure isn't very reliable.
you would almost hate to see the industry be shut down for 2 months because of this.. However, with everything that is going on with the seriousness of HIV you would almost think that it would be best for everyone to do just that.... I mean come on it is hitting into every studio that has shot a porn with any of the actors/actresses that have been mentioned, and still could be mentioned....
It isn't something that a lot of us would like to see with nothing new being released, but there are a lot of studios out there that haven't began to release quite a bit of their work yet....
Let's hope for a speedy resolution to all of this, and that those named in the articles as having been exposed to the disease are all cleared.
[Link]
*Mutt* Deactivated User
752 Posts 8/03
Posted - Apr 15 2004 : 4:07PM
from the first time I read any news of this it was obvious to me even as a layman that the only real way to contain this and protect everybody was an immediate shutdown - i am completely baffled by Sharon Mitchell's rather wishy washy statements for the first day and a half. It's a doomsday scenario she should have played out many times to be ready for just such an occurrence. But AIM is acting like this is the first time for them, first day she decides a 30 day quarantine is enough - i couldn't believe it when she came back the next day with 60 days because 30 day quarantine will only catch 75% as opposed to 99% at 60 days. This means for a full day and a half, and I assume all the years before this when AIM planned for this type of event, they thought 75% was ok? That's insanity - we're dealing with 12 girls lives here. 25% is a huge number when you are dealing with something this important. Yes I know she corrected it the next day but it's still pretty troubling.