Kim Kardashian is in a close second
Introducing Lady LorReign| Author | Post |
|---|---|
| BlackTears Member 7 Posts 5/24 | You can make a perfect porn star in a lab so which features are you picking from which currently porn stars or recently retired porn stars. Features- Ass- Boobs - Physique- Skin texture - Face- Pussy- Eyes- Hairs - Voice- Feet- Lips- [Link] |
| Sexuallysexy99 Member 246 Posts 8/22 | Kim Kardashian is in a close second |
| Pete Zaface Senior Member 3064 Posts 8/03 | |
| Kasiall Member 469 Posts 12/18 | |
| BlackTears Member 7 Posts 5/24 | |
| BlackTears Member 7 Posts 5/24 | |
| rearadmiral All-Star Member 6519 Posts 12/11 | I love how both Amia and Tanner are slim and petite and have small-but-perky breasts and pert little asses. I love their tanned skin. Tanner ended up burned out at the end of her career and it was sad to see her struggling. She was obviously on something in several of her last scenes. I'm sure the video of her having a meltdown on a set over a missing cell phone didn't help. That video should never have seen the light of day. I like some of the stuff that Jim Powers produced and directed, but he should never have recorded and released that video. It was cruel to do so. While I was initially happy when the news came of a pending Tanner anal scene, the result wasn't great. Tanner was clearly on something. Her once-perfect complexion was marred from substance abuse. She was physically present, but not there mentally, and it shows. It's a rare first anal that I wish never happened. While I'm on the topic of Tanner, I was once the self-proclaimed biggest Tanner Mayes fan on the planet. She was my favourite model for several years. I was a bit obsessed with her in a way that hadn't happened before or happened since. Amia is pure perfection too. I don't begrudge her getting her breasts augmented, because she was no longer the 18-year-old girl-next-door. I'll never delete my Amia or Tanner scenes. So while I like the premise of your thread, in my opinion, perfection has already been achieved in nature. Behold the beauty of Amia and Tanner (that middle shot of Amia's ass would get me off on my deathbed):
|
| RocketMan Member 678 Posts 6/08 | |
| RickFBerger3 Member You do you. 201 Posts 11/23 | But take this question a little deeper, and there's a lot more sense to it than I first realized. How many artists in the world used great porn stars as their models? I can think of some great fantasy art from the late '80s and early '90s, featuring a great woman with a huge sword and spectacular breasts, and when I look closely enough, hell, it's just Christy Canyon. The artist took her Penthouse pictorial, pinned it to his whiteboard, and used her as his reference model. (If his work was commissioned, it might explain why it took so long. "Yea, I was in the studio for several hours, but for some reason my brush never touched the canvas in all that time.") Not just because his warrior princess had great big tits, but you look for all the little reference points where your eyes tell you it's Christy, and she's a dead giveaway. You might advise this artist, hey, next time, don't just look at one porn star, how about six or seven of your favorites, and mix it up. To which his response might be, "But you can't just mix and match body parts and expect to manufacture the perfect woman on canvas." But that's not the point: Great artists all through history looked at many, many models, and came up with ideal frameworks for women they created through their drawings and paintings. In eras and places where having live, nude models in the studio was against the law, they sketched clothed women in public, and imagined those women nude later. (Which is why they'd often get their vaginas all wrong. Made-up pussies are awful things compared to reality.) So who would serve as my models? I'm painting a woman whom I don't want folks to identify, "Hey, that's just Krissy Lynn," or, "Brooke Wylde." But I still need them to represent perfection for the framework I'm drawing.
Okay, one has to begin with Jayden Jaymes. Yes, I know her tits were fake during her career, but perfection can be made with human ingenuity. Jayden comes at you with proportions that are astonishingly compelling. Everything on this woman fits together absolutely the way the Creator intended, even if the Creator was overruled on two points. But then, let's look at other women whose bodies I'd borrow for the same project. Women with different features and proportions, but whose bodies collectively evoke a sense of awe and magic.
Evanni Solei also stuns you with her complete form. Hope folks don't mind the photo I borrowed here shows Evanni rather, um, occupied. Artists draw geometries for the human form that align reference points, and those points are not where you might expect them. They're often the tips of the elbows, the points of the knees, the skin tucks under the armpits. Places you might not think are necessarily sensual (though some guys love armpits). There are points all over Evanni's body that are not on BlackTears' list of body parts, that are sensual as all get-out. Every point on this woman's body is stimulating, and all of them put together are truly symphonic.
But here's a woman I haven't mentioned in this forum before, and she's well overdue: Morgan Moon. You can't describe anything about Morgan with the word "big." Her breasts are not huge, her vagina does not protrude like other girls, and she has the tight, firm ass of a ballerina. But let me tell you, when she uses her full body in motion, there is no more perfect reference model, either on Earth or the cosmos. I discovered Morgan years ago on a site affiliated with BangBros, "BustyAdventures.com," where she'd been given the random name "Misa." In her scene, before she even begins to start masturbating, she spends the first 17 minutes of her disrobing massaging and playing with her breasts, much of that time while they're still inside her pink, knit bikini top. Most any other woman spends this much time not naked, concentrating on just her tits, when she's a C-cup, and I'd get really bored. But her whole body, clothed or not, is just so spot-on perfectly proportioned, that I could watch her knead her tits for 8 hours straight before I'd need a bathroom break, and then I'd come back for another 8-hour stretch. An artist needs a model in his or her mind to represent perfect proportionality. From there, he or she can make adjustments, but in keeping with the framework the artist started with. If you're creating a woman, in your studio or in your laboratory, you want to begin with someone whose body speaks volumes, and who oozes perfection. A model who evokes that impulsive instinct to care for her, the way I dare say Tanner Mayes triggered rearadmiral's inner desire. My base model, in the studio in my mind, has a geometry that would blend these three perfect ladies. RFB3 |
| RelentlessOnanism Senior Member 2660 Posts 3/16 | |
| wcw43921 Senior Member Look Into My Eyes-- 1252 Posts 4/08 | So forget the lab--take her to Preparation.
____________________________________________________
|
| hhhhhjhhh Member 133 Posts 10/17 | |
| bellend Deactivated User 570 Posts 9/09 | |
| RelentlessOnanism Senior Member 2660 Posts 3/16 | Edited by - relentlessonanism on 7/8/2024 7:49:01 AM |
| LunarTide New Member 2 Posts 1/25 | |
| Shadow115 Member 332 Posts 7/09 | Anyways, mine would probably look like shit if they were real: Ass- Isis Taylor |
| Use the code below to link to this topic or a specific post. |
| URL of this thread |
| Link to this post with HTML |
| Link to this post with Forum Code |