Who are some pornstars the were kind of shocked by what they did on camera because you didn't think they would or look like they would be into that. For example I would of never thought just looking at Liz Jordan that she would do or even be into a gangbang creampie with at least 5 dudes. On the outside just looking at her I would guess she would just be into vanilla sex and lesbian scenes here and there. But then I watched her gangbang creampie scene and I fell in love with her. Another example is Naomi Swann and Avery Christy I would of never guess that they would be the anal princesses that they are. I love it now let me know if you have any pornstars you were like "really they are into that?" Nice!!!! I love finding out that pornstars are into something or shot a scene or two of something you never imagined them shooting especially when they are early on or new to the porn industry.
I was a bit surprised to see Gabbie Carter come out of the gate so fast. Exploited College Girls was among her first scenes and she did anal in that. That's unusual for someone who goes on to be a superstar.
[Link]
ShelbyGordan Deactivated User
422 Posts 6/20
Posted - Dec 5 2020 : 12:52PM
Absolutely agree. i like your words "out the gate so fast" yes there are a handful who start out the gate fast in their careers that to me can be mind blowing. As for Gabbie Carter I for sure thought she would've been a superstar. But I guess she retired now or at least on a break but I'm not too sure. But I thought she would've been a superstar.
To be honest, I'm never surprised. But then again, my favourite adage is 'never judge a book by it's cover'. And it's so true. Remy LaCroix did anal and DP in her first scene, Riley Reid took almost 5 years to do both in the same series of Tushy scenes, yet both became anal queens, which you wouldn't necessarily have guessed at looking at their pictures. TBH, seeing a starlet with super model looks doing bukkake or anal or something else 'nasty' is so hot, but not exactly surprising anymore.
Let me first say that while I don't believe anyone who names a performer is implying anything but I'm not going to do that because it can be taken that some performers due to their looks are more likely to do the nasty stuff when experience tells us that's false.
Now that this is out of the way. Let me say that the only times I've been surprised is when a performer who only does one type of porn (like g/g) decides to also do b/g or when a long time vag only performer decides to do anal and not just a one and done but a bunch of them(see Riley Reid).
Not really. How does one deduce somebody's sexual proclivities from their appearance?
[Link]
ao606 Deactivated User
1035 Posts 11/20
Posted - Dec 6 2020 : 2:39PM
Ariana Marie and golden showers. Never would think based on her looks that she would be down to be into kinks like that. I know she did a couple of blowbangs a year or 2 into the biz, but I was still surprised by her ease for other fetishes.
Katie St. Ives being into girl/girl scenes. She only did scenes with guys and wasn't into girl/girl scenes at first, but then she got into girl/girl scenes & enjoyed them!
[Link]
ShelbyGordan Deactivated User
422 Posts 6/20
Posted - Dec 6 2020 : 9:44PM
Ok that was super hot I had no idea she did a piss..I loved it.
[Link]
ao606 Deactivated User
1035 Posts 11/20
Posted - Dec 7 2020 : 1:17AM
I see what you're saying. I guess you can't, but you can generally deduce by the pattern of scenes that they've done, their online social-media behavior, etc. the kind of scenes they would do or won't do.
Not to mention, golden showers are still relatively taboo, so that further adds to these conclusions we jump to.
I remember being quite surprised when I discovered Taylor St. Claire. She was not just one of the most beautiful performers of the time, but she had also a certain air of elegance and refinement. If I remember correctly she was also an actress in regular movies... and she was in some of the nastiest and controversial porns of the early 2000s.
Every performer is an individual so I fail to see how you can deduce what they'll do from the "pattern of scenes". For example, some people start doing anal from the beginning/early in their career, some take years before they start doing it while others never do anal on screen. Now if a performer stated she won't do anal on film or that she has no plans on doing it over months or years of her career, I get the surprise of finding anal is now on their card.
Regarding Ariana Marie, while you later conceded you can't deduce who does and doesn't perform certain sex acts based on looks, you categorically did deduce, albeit incorrectly, that she would not be into golden showers based on her looks. I'm curious what physiognomy workshop determines someone of Ariana Marie's looks wouldn't be into golden showers.
I feel the same away about Silvia Saige, is doing plenty of enthusiastic G/G scenes after saying "I am only gay for pay and even then it's hard for me to swallow. I am not into women in the slightest. I like to think that my vagina is the only vagina that is edible."
[Link]
ao606 Deactivated User
1035 Posts 11/20
Posted - Dec 7 2020 : 10:58AM
Is that not the same thing? We don't have to read interviews from these girls to come to a logical conclusion on what kind of scenes they're most known for. For example, if Darcie Dolce were to start doing BG tomorrow, would you not be surprised based simply on the fact that all her scenes have been GG thus far? When Eva Lovia started doing BG and then later on went on to do a BBG and eventually a DP even, were we not pleasantly surprised?No I specifically said it was based on her pattern of scenes and not her looks. It is not a infallible method, but it's generally a good marker imo.
No it's not necessarily the same thing. What somebody is "most known for" and what they do aren't one and the same without exception. A performer can have plans of their own career progression without declaring them openly. That's not the same as them explicitly stating they won't do X or Y or that they have no intention of doing X or Y.Erm, you did make that deduction based on looks. In fact, let's quote what you said before seeing that you haven't edited your first post in this thread.Please tell us how this demonstrates your assumption is not based on looks in this case.
[Link]
ao606 Deactivated User
1035 Posts 11/20
Posted - Dec 7 2020 : 2:37PM
Except the whole topic is about the audience being surprised about a star's proclivity for any acts whether stated explicitly or otherwise. Let's take Ariana's example... she isn't "most known for" any one genre or act, and yet her doing fetish style videos caught me off guard because 1. (and probably the only point that matters) the act itself is very much taboo in "mainstream" porn, so to see a "mainstream" actress like Ariana doing it is surprising.You seem to be missing the entire point of the thread by latching onto one thing. the surprise factor is the point of the thread, not the reasons why they're surprising.Because I later clarified that it's not purely based on looks and you managed to ignore that?
I didn't ignore your revision, nor did you clarify what you said. Basing something on looks then saying it's not based on looks is changing your stance, not clarification.
There's nothing wrong with changing your stance but I'm curious why you made the basis on looks originally. On what basis did Ariana's looks not strike you as someone who would be into golden showers?
^ Can you let this rest? This is a porn forum, not an interrogation. I'm finding it very annoying.
To generally answer the wider issue, of course, no woman 'looks' like they're into anal or DP or water sports etc. But when one you personally find very attractive does it, I can see how some might be surprised. Or when they do something they haven't done when they've been in the industry a while. Of course this may have been her plan all along. But as we're not psychic, we don't know that and so of course the possibility of being surprised exists.
But I think the tone of this thread has so far been very respectful, so I don't understand the level of your hostility. (That's how you are coming across. My apologies if that is not the case.)
This can be a great thread as long as no one mentions looks because to do so implies that all the women not named looked like they were into whatever fetish they did and you have to agree that this is some kind of insult even if it wasn't meant to be and for that reason we should all avoid using terms like "she doesn't look like someone who's into that".
Now let me add to the thread. I was surprised when I first saw Magdalene ST.Michaels doing b/g because the only thing I knew of her was all the amazing g/g video she had done and she was so passionate in her g/g videos that I thought she was a g/g only performer but seeing her do b/hg proved that she was just as passionate in doing those kind of scenes.
[Link]
ShelbyGordan Deactivated User
422 Posts 6/20
Posted - Dec 8 2020 : 8:57AM
What the he'll is going on in this thread. She. I created it in just asked a question and dropped a few names.. Now it's turn into a debate or integration.
^^^ "This is a porn forum." Well thanks for stating the obvious. As you are so fond of observing, on a porn forum one can ask questions to establish rationale or the basis of people's statements as is the case on many other forums. Evidently, I must be wanting in not being able to see how the two are mutually exclusive.
What Pat said is exactly what I was getting at. ao606's initial reply read like as if only a porn performer perceived by him as physically attractive would do X and never dream of doing Y. As I think Pat implied, it comes across as an insult toward unnamed performers who do perform given sex acts, intimating that they're less physically attractive than those you "never would think" would do such acts based on their looks but actually do.
^^^ and ^ How can you insult someone when their name HASN'T been mentioned? Saying someone doesn't look like like they'd be into something doesn't mean that every single other pornstar in the history of porn does. And I will use whatever expression I want to use, thank you. You can't expect everyone to share your morals.
But you are right to suggest we should get back to the topic. And as I haven't found anything surprising recently, I will leave this topic until I do.
Always feet n ass. In that order.
Edited by - Feet N Ass on 12/8/2020 9:11:51 AM
Edited by - Feet N Ass on 12/8/2020 9:13:03 AM
[Link]
ShelbyGordan Deactivated User
422 Posts 6/20
Posted - Dec 8 2020 : 12:12PM
^^^ Yes what this person says I agree with. Or maybe I should delete this thread because we are so off topic and I'm afraid we won't get back on it.
There is a performer known as Beverly at Karups Older Women. I don't know whether she quite qualifies as 'older' - she might have been in her early 30s when the scenes were shot, going by looks. In any case, her scenes there are very tame solo scenes, and she comes off as a bit shy. I looked her up to find more elsewhere and discovered that she's done a scat scene.
I've also come across established softcore models (angelically presented, similar to MetArt) where their only other scenes were intense Euro-style BDSM.
I'm interpreting this thread as, based on their past trajectory, some shoot they did is quite a leap.
[Link]
Luke Lake Deactivated User
878 Posts 8/10
Posted - Dec 8 2020 : 7:13PM
I never thought Whitney Wright would do a Dredd anal scene but I'm glad she did
[Link]
ShelbyGordan Deactivated User
422 Posts 6/20
Posted - Dec 8 2020 : 9:51PM
Yo she did Dredd anal scene. Omg I need to watch it, when was this released?
[Link]
ao606 Deactivated User
1035 Posts 11/20
Posted - Dec 8 2020 : 10:41PM
I changed my stance because you were right, my assumptions weren't made on looks as I initially stated, rather the kind of scenes we think a performer is into based on their history of scenes.
[Link]
Akashsan Deactivated User
230 Posts 10/18
Posted - Dec 9 2020 : 4:45AM
Below mentioned pornstars are into Golden showers and pissing: Ashley lane Emily Willis Gianna Dior Mazzy Grace Natalie brooks Rocky Emerson Paige Owens Nina Elle Adria Rae and the list goes on......
[Link]
stoneblade Deactivated User
450 Posts 7/16
Posted - Dec 9 2020 : 5:45AM
^
Did any of the above confirm this? In an independent interview? Not like the dogfart interviews where all the girls say they're into BCC.
Hazel Heart Interview
Posted - Dec 5 2020 : 11:20AM
