[Link]
Stacked 14 - review by Captain Jack| Author | Post |
|---|---|
| draghixafan Senior Member  Less identical crap, more sleaze and bush! 2378 Posts 7/09 |  Posted - Dec 6 2013 : 2:21AMThere are plenty of things I like about the classic era, but one thing I think really adds to its charm sensuality and also sense of fantasy (and probably admittedly a bit of a return to fond memories of my youth) is the look of the movies being shot on film. Prompted by perhaps not the best example but this pic of Shauna Grant..  Is it possible, and desirable I guess to others except yours truly, to recreate that look realistically in today's videos? [Link] |
| Joe Mayo Deactivated User Sure Thing, Joe Mayo. 533 Posts 10/13 | Posted - Dec 6 2013 : 2:27AM [Link] |
| draghixafan Senior Member Less identical crap, more sleaze and bush! 2378 Posts 7/09 | Posted - Dec 6 2013 : 6:30AM [Link] |
aclayfan  All-Star Member 5060 Posts 8/11 | Posted - Dec 6 2013 : 6:57AM Also,the face in the squatting photo doesn't look like Shauna, but you can tell from the others, it's her. Edited by - aclayfan on 12/6/2013 7:00:31 AM [Link] |
| draghixafan Senior Member Less identical crap, more sleaze and bush! 2378 Posts 7/09 | Posted - Dec 7 2013 : 12:13AM But admittedly I do have massive nostalgia for that entire look, tanlines, bush, hair, makeup. And though I rant about it regularly and never my intention to hijcak/derail my own thread that it sometimes to me feels more genuine sex from that period too. But I would love to see a HD movie that brings back this look, complete, not only the film but everything that goes with it, sensual full red lipstick, sunglasses, long straight hair tossed sexually over the shoulder, lens flares, blinds shadows, all of it? [Link] |
| draghixafan Senior Member Less identical crap, more sleaze and bush! 2378 Posts 7/09 | Posted - Dec 20 2013 : 8:03PM [Link] |
| JigglyBoobs Senior Member 1614 Posts 3/12 | Posted - Dec 21 2013 : 9:27PM https://forum.adultdvdtalk.com/could-porn-ever-remaster-as-good-as-tv/ [Link] |
| CummingLinguist All-Star Member 5908 Posts 11/11 | Posted - Dec 22 2013 : 6:53AM 1) I would love to see high quality remasters of classic porn. 2) I used to enjoy jerking off the Shauna Grant. Unfortunately, the market will probably never support remasters of more than the most famous titles, and after her death, I couldn't jerk it to Shauna anymore. [Link] |
| draghixafan Senior Member Less identical crap, more sleaze and bush! 2378 Posts 7/09 | Posted - Dec 25 2013 : 6:58PM Also enjoyed immensely spanking it to the supermodel gorgeousity that was Shauna Grant, agree was very tragic similar to Savannah. You could perhaps replace her with the stunning Marilyn Jess in the spank register? I was really more talking about today's porn though with today's starlets and in HD that the odd film occasionally being filmed, perhaps a tribute or neo-classic series, with that 70s/80s aesthetic?? And a bonus for us too, would be the much missed bush and sleaze aswell :) Edited by - draghixafan on 12/26/2013 12:09:57 AM [Link] |
| JigglyBoobs Senior Member 1614 Posts 3/12 | Posted - Dec 26 2013 : 4:58AM [Link] |
| Gore Gore Girl Doctor of the Erotic Arts 7238 Posts 1/09 | Posted - Dec 26 2013 : 11:25AM [Link] |
| CummingLinguist All-Star Member 5908 Posts 11/11 | Posted - Dec 27 2013 : 8:23AM [Link] |
| pat362 Senior Member 10083 Posts 3/10 | Posted - Dec 27 2013 : 9:58AM That said. I still hope that someone at least attempts it. [Link] |
| CummingLinguist All-Star Member 5908 Posts 11/11 | Posted - Dec 28 2013 : 7:04AM [Link] |
| pat362 Senior Member 10083 Posts 3/10 | Posted - Dec 28 2013 : 9:52AM a movie that was never shot in HD can be upgraded to HD. The best you can hope is to digitize the print,clean the static out of it and improve audio. If you could really increase the resolution on movies then wouldn't Hollywood have already done that for many of their older titles? Edited by - pat362 on 12/29/2013 1:25:18 PM [Link] |
| Flash Golden Age Classic 11018 Posts 5/01 | Posted - Dec 28 2013 : 11:46AM [Link] |
| Gore Gore Girl Doctor of the Erotic Arts 7238 Posts 1/09 | Posted - Dec 28 2013 : 12:32PM [Link] |
| CRFlixxx Member 60 Posts 4/13 | Posted - Dec 29 2013 : 2:08AM With the introduction of the Blackmagic Cinema Camera and the Pocket Cinema Camera, the cost of raw has dropped dramatically, ($2000 for the BMCC & $1000 for the BMPCC), the associated costs of shooting raw haven't dropped much however. You need either SSD drives or expensive SDXC cards and then lots of external hard drives for storage. A 64gb SD card for the Pocket only records around 25min of raw. That same SD card on a DSLR would record 2-3+hrs, though the footage wouldn't be half as grade-able. Speaking of which, you then have to grade the image to resemble the film look, but more important that than you have to light it the way a pro cinematographer would light a mainstream film. You now have a movie that costs 3 times as much and would take 3 times as long to film. It can be done, but how many studio's will take the time and money to do it? EDIT: As for remastering old films, as Flash said, 35mm film is basically around 4k resolution, more than enough for HD. It's mainly a question of the cost of scanning into 2k vs 4k and how much to restore a print. Again, time consuming and costly. Movies that were shot on SD video during the 80-90s are going to be stuck at that resolution. It's possible to clean up and make it look nicer, but again...time & money for not much gain. Edited by - CRFlixxx on 12/29/2013 2:21:26 AM Edited by - CRFlixxx on 12/29/2013 2:23:10 AM [Link] |
| draghixafan Senior Member Less identical crap, more sleaze and bush! 2378 Posts 7/09 | Posted - Feb 4 2014 : 2:02AM Sounds like cost is a huge factor, pity as am seeing and liking that first pic again while making this reply... Ah well :) [Link] |
| Use the code below to link to this topic or a specific post. |
| URL of this thread |
| Link to this post with HTML |
| Link to this post with Forum Code |