Prolific pornstars VS very prolific pornstars | Porn Fan Community Forum

Reviewers Recommend

Stacked 14

Stacked 14 - review by Captain Jack
Director: Mason
Starring: Mason, Vince Karter, Valentina Nappi, Lucas Frost, Zac Wild, Blake Blossom, Chloe Surreal, Hailey Rose. Read review

Participate...

log in
register

Browse...

Etiquette
Active Topics
Popular Topics
Member List
Search

All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 239 > Prolific pornstars VS very prolific pornstars

Author	Post
Cloudburst Deactivated User 392 Posts 1/14	Posted - Jan 30 2014 : 10:29AM Why are there what I guess you would call very prolific "top" male performers like James Deen, Manuel Ferrara, Steve Holmes, Rocco Sifredi, Mark Wood, Lex Steel, Sean Michaels (you get the point) that perform in TONS of scenes. Then you have what I would call a second level of male performer who just does A LOT of scenes (not tons). To me there is no distinguishable difference between these two "classes" of male porn stars, so what are some reasons why some perform in tons and the others just do a lots of scenes? Edited by - Cloudburst on Jan 30 2014 [Link]
JB_X Deactivated User addled 1500 Posts 10/12	Posted - Jan 30 2014 : 5:13PM Because you're in the minority if you don't see a difference between good performers and average or below-average performers. [Link]
dnice Member 798 Posts 12/09	Posted - Jan 30 2014 : 5:29PM This confuses me too lex gets to many scenes would like to see more LT dexter dazzle and jon jon scenes those guys have the same abiliys of manuel ferrra and do some real nasty ass licking [Link]
Idlewild66 Deactivated User 721 Posts 12/11	Posted - Jan 30 2014 : 6:13PM I think Jon Jon and Ice Cold are the two most underrated talents in the game...even when you put race aside. [Link]
JohnW Senior Member 1351 Posts 6/08	Posted - Jan 31 2014 : 9:05PM I would guess stamina, genetics and level of professionalism. Peter North might have a huge genetic advantage given his loads, but for the thousands of scenes he's done, he's got to have made porn the #1 priority in order to deliver. I suspect 80% of his sex life is on video. [Link]

Draxxx Senior Member 3831 Posts 2/07	Posted - Feb 1 2014 : 9:15AM Cloudburst wrote: Why are there what I guess you would call very prolific "top" male performers like James Deen, Manuel Ferrara, Steve Holmes, Rocco Sifredi, Mark Wood, Lex Steel, Sean Michaels (you get the point) that perform in TONS of scenes. Then you have what I would call a second level of male performer who just does A LOT of scenes (not tons). To me there is no distinguishable difference between these two "classes" of male porn stars, so what are some reasons why some perform in tons and the others just do a lots of scenes? Edited by - Cloudburst on Jan 30 2014 Click to expand It would seem that some of those guys have formed some sort of relationship with particular studios/companies and those studios/directors use them alot because of it. Some guys seem to have that with several studios. For example DIGITAL PLAYGROUND mostly usues the same few guys over and over and the same is mostly true for BRAZZERS. Manuel not only a go to guy for both of those studios but for EVIL ANGEL as well where he even has his own titles. Plus I have to image other directors use him because he's a good performer and girls probably request him. So Manuel ends up working a lot. A few other guys seem to have a similar thing going on. I've heard several girls mention Jon Jon is their fav performer to work with but Jon Jon will probably never be a huge pornstar like some others because he doesn't have the size of Lex or Mandingo for a studio to exploit. He doesn't have the presence or smooth looks of Lex or Sean Michaels. And maybe i'm wong but I don't see a studio building a line starring him like Lex, Sean, LT, or some others we've seen. So even though he's a good performer I don't think he'll ever be a really big name in porn the way some of the guys you mention are. There are many guys in porn like that. All this is my opinion of course and I could be wrong... [Link]
pat362 Senior Member 10083 Posts 3/10	Posted - Feb 1 2014 : 12:22PM Cloudburst wrote: Why are there what I guess you would call very prolific "top" male performers like James Deen, Manuel Ferrara, Steve Holmes, Rocco Sifredi, Mark Wood, Lex Steel, Sean Michaels Click to expand I'll give you one clue....All of these performers (except one) precede the world recession and the advent of Tube and Torrent sites by nearly a decade and for some it's significantly more. The only exception is James Deen who started in 2004. I don't care which of the below performers you pick but none of them would have the career they have had if they had started porn just a couple of years. There is now so few studios shooting porn on a regular basis that it's no longer possible to accumulate the number of scenes these guys have managed to do. James Deen 2004 Lex Steel 1994 Mark Wood 1998 Manuel Ferrera 1999 Rocco Siffredi 1987 Sean Micheals 1988 Steve Holmes 1996 [Link]

All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 239Prolific pornstars VS very prolific pornstars

Previous topic: 2j013 Anal/DP Debuts (Web only) in Review
Next topic: What are the Best Teen Sites?

Link to this post

Use the code below to link to this topic or a specific post.

URL of this thread

Link to this post with HTML

Link to this post with Forum Code