I call BS on this. Most studies show a large majority of women can reach orgasm through vaginal penetration (without clitoral stimulation) during the course of sex. Edited by - Cloudburst on 4/1/2014 7:20:53 AM
[Link]
Cloudburst Deactivated User
392 Posts 1/14
Posted - Apr 1 2014 : 7:24AM
What does the size of a penis have to do with whether or not it stays fully erect?
I don't think gravity is the problem. I think the available supply of neurotransmitters is the problem, given that an erection is not simply an on/off proposition. typo... sigh Edited by - hardware on 4/1/2014 8:49:37 PM
Some Women like Small Dick Some Women like Big dick but all Women like Erect Dick. Keep your Dick Erect and all will be well. :4 Incher speaking:
[Link]
Cloudburst Deactivated User
392 Posts 1/14
Posted - Apr 2 2014 : 10:41AM
Cute reply, but you offer no evidence or studies that disprove a majority of women can reach orgasm solely through vaginal penetration without clitoral stimulation.
Edited by - Cloudburst on 4/2/2014 10:45:27 AM
[Link]
Cloudburst Deactivated User
392 Posts 1/14
Posted - Apr 2 2014 : 10:45AM
Hardware are you saying that the size of a penis makes a difference in terms of getting and retaining an erection? Edited by - Cloudburst on 4/2/2014 10:45:58 AM
I'm saying that your erection depends as much upon your brain as it does upon your penis. Thus, keeping an erection requires maintaining a feedback loop between the two. Leaving aside an individual's state of mind, if a larger penis requires the brain to use more neurotransmitters to maintain an erection then it seems likely that it may come up short of said neurotransmitters more often than a brain that is dealing with an average penis.
[Link]
Cloudburst Deactivated User
392 Posts 1/14
Posted - Apr 2 2014 : 3:59PM
Hardware I love how you assume everyone on this forum has an IQ over 130. I myself would say I am of above average intelligence (even though I dropped out of H.S. but that had to do with me being severely bullied not my ability to graduate) and I still have trouble making sense of half the stuff you write on this forum including the above post.
[Link]
Cloudburst Deactivated User
392 Posts 1/14
Posted - Apr 2 2014 : 4:03PM
Okay so I did some research and it turns out I was actually wrong. Most studies show that between 20-30% of women can orgasm solely from vaginal penetration. That said, your statement about talking to a couple dozen women and only 3 said they can have vaginal orgasms is clearly incorrect.
Oh boy, these sex talk discussions always seem to end up with a guy telling a woman she is mistaken about women's sexuality. Just to pile on, wahine is right. It's been proven again and again, in studies and anecdotally, and even Cloudburst admits it. Yet, wahine must be making up those stories. Hilarious.
How about this: I have only met one woman who I discussed this stuff with who can orgasm from vaginal penetration alone. Edited by - Gore Gore Girl on 4/2/2014 5:03:59 PM
[Link]
Boogie With Stu Deactivated User
1723 Posts 1/13
Posted - Apr 2 2014 : 5:12PM
To pile on more, I gave up on this guy after reading his delightful social commentary in Porn Pool. There's just no point in trying to make sense out of nonsense or to reason with the unreasonable.
[Link]
Boogie With Stu Deactivated User
1723 Posts 1/13
Posted - Apr 2 2014 : 5:16PM
Though to be clear, the patience exhibited here by some is certainly laudable.
[Link]
Cloudburst Deactivated User
392 Posts 1/14
Posted - Apr 2 2014 : 7:17PM
What is incorrect or unreasonable about what I wrote? If you don't believe we live in a sexist society that favors and privileges female lives over males then you sir are the only unreasonable and clueless person. Edited by - Cloudburst on 4/2/2014 7:24:06 PM
[Link]
Cloudburst Deactivated User
392 Posts 1/14
Posted - Apr 2 2014 : 7:22PM
Not true. What I admitted is that only 20-30% of females can orgasm through vaginal penetration alone according to studies. Even if you take the lower end of that statistic (20%) that doesn't add up to what wahine said: "only 3 have said that they can have vaginal orgasms and I've talked with a couple dozen women". Do the simple math, what she said doesn't add up: 20% of 36 (couple dozen) would be at least 7 women.
And what exactly makes you qualified? Oh I guess because you are a female you're automatically correct on these issues.
[Link]
Cloudburst Deactivated User
392 Posts 1/14
Posted - Apr 2 2014 : 11:47PM
Ooooooh, please elucidate me. And for the record the gender wage gap has been debunked: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/christina-hoff-sommers/wage-gap_b_2073804.html http://www.cbsnews.com/news/the-gender-pay-gap-is-a-complete-myth
[Link]
Boogie With Stu Deactivated User
1723 Posts 1/13
Posted - Apr 3 2014 : 12:05AM
Do they now? How convenient. Like I said before about ingrained and inherent...
Probability does not guarantee that a 'fair' coin will alternate between heads and tails. It tells us that a large enough sample size will show an even distribution between heads and tails if the coin is fair. In other words, Wahine is telling the truth of her experience, which may or may not accurately reflect a much larger sample group, ie, the entire female population. Frankly, it doesn't matter to me. The only 'truth' that I need be concerned about is the truth of the woman who is in bed with me. If she cannot achieve orgasm through vaginal penetration only then it is no use my complaining that she's a statistical anomaly.
“Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards.” - Kierkegaard 2684 Posts 8/09
Posted - Apr 3 2014 : 12:58AM
It's been shown many times about same jobs women vs men and pay, which is the direct evidence. For example, male vs female jr faculty and professors getting tenure and promotions. There's other issues that relate to pay and career equity, promotions cycles and fair representation in esteemed seats/positions. Look at boards of directors, corporate VPs, and executive committees many are a bunch of white guys. It has been changing but this is an example. While working for one of the best hospitals in the country/world, while I was there, there was 30 section chiefs and major department heads (like head of Endocrinology, Hematology, ENT, Infectious Diseases....) 2 were women out of about 30. And one section chief who was a woman occupying the Women's Health section chief position. We're talking about a world renowned hospital with plenty of female candidates (doctors). You're telling me none of them are equal or better qualified (qualifications go beyond medical skills too) than those male appointed? Edited by - BYOB_Kenobi on 4/3/2014 1:01:02 AM
Actually, I'm assuming that you are well read. Were I to assume that everyone had a high IQ my posts would be much shorter because people would reach the appropriate conclusion in their heads without a lot of exposition on my part.
[Link]
Cloudburst Deactivated User
392 Posts 1/14
Posted - Apr 3 2014 : 7:54AM
Based on this quote I'm assuming you are male, am I correct?
IIRC Wahine is a university professor and writes scholarly papers that actually discuss scholarly issues. I don't know what her Ph. D is in but even if she isn't a sociologist she should have an understanding about how scholarly writing works. I do know, however, that her Ph. DD's are size GGG, all natural and she is thinking about signing a five year contract with Kink.com to perform on Hogtied, Sex and Submission and The Upper Floor as a submissive. She looks a bit like a cross between Wendy Whoppers and Lorelei Lee.
“Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards.” - Kierkegaard 2684 Posts 8/09
Posted - Apr 6 2014 : 4:09AM
We need him to do a massive study showing study designs, confidence intervals, p-values, standard deviations, and bias of dick size. Then we'll need another huge multicenter, randomized, blinded, placebo of women's sexual preference of dick size. That's gonna need a R01 grant. As they say, show your work.
One can change a lamp in about two minutes. As for ten, I guess the other nine will be standing around talking about philosophy while the lamp is being changed.
That huffingtonpost article Ted posted answered the dreaded question for all the guys out there with tiny 4 or 5 inch weiners. According to the study: "the ideal size is from 7 to 8.25 inches in length and from 6.25 to 6.15 inches in circumference". So there you go, proof that the myth women don't care about penis size is just that - a huge myth. I actually was a little surprised though that women prefer penises that large.
[Link]
Cloudburst Deactivated User
392 Posts 1/14
Posted - Apr 7 2014 : 5:13PM
In porn I would say around 10% of actors are 8 inches and larger. How rare would you say amongst the general population of men?
Because people are too lazy to RTFA: the HuffPo "article" is just a grab from a graphic from a website, and they credited Buzzfeed, an aggregator/blog. Buzzfeed picked it up from PenisSizeDebate.com. Do what you want, but that site doesn't look like a study you'd get from The Rand Corporation, The Kinsey Institute, or even Larry Flynt Enterprises. But it is worth a look for entertainment purposes. I was particularly pleased by Men Dislike Small Pussy Lips. YES! Yes! Finally! This comes up every time my pals and I get together, and nobody ever believes me. Men hate small pussy lips! Of course, if you skim Porn Pool posts for more than a week you'd know this already.
No, you are wrong. Not all men hate small pussy lips. I like them small. All articles like that are bullshit. Anyone who can claim to know how all men (or women) think is a fool.
As a guy who loves small pussy lips, I had to read that article that Jayo posted. It's hilarious. I just love this paragraph: If you are one of those men who only like hairy pussies and small labia you might have another reason for your bizarre preference. Maybe you just don't like vaginas to begin with and it might be a good idea to re-evaluate your sexual orientation. I once knew a grumpy guy who only wanted to have sex with girls who had a bushy vagina. I asked him why and he answered "Because I hate to look at the lips and the hole!" Four years later I met him again and he told me that after all he had realized he was gay. Now he is a happier guy because he doesn't have to lick "women's lips and holes" anymore.
[Link]
Cloudburst Deactivated User
392 Posts 1/14
Posted - Apr 11 2014 : 12:51AM
^ I'm 100% straight and not particularly turned on by the sight of a vagina. Fucking them or licking them is another thing, but the physical appearance of a vagina never really did much for me. Been watching porn for years and any time there is a close-up of a vagina I fast-forward right thru, much rather look at boobs, butts, legs, thighs, etc. Edited by - Cloudburst on 4/11/2014 12:51:59 AM
Maybe it has something to do with you mansplaining and making an ass of yourself without even realizing it.
[Link]
Cloudburst Deactivated User
392 Posts 1/14
Posted - Apr 13 2014 : 7:09PM
Sorry, can you please explain how I'm being an ass in this topic thread? And what the hell is "mansplaining"??
[Link]
trout bum Deactivated User
"I'm Not Here To Suck My Own Cock!" 2145 Posts 5/10
Posted - Apr 13 2014 : 8:04PM
^Mansplaining...Google is your friend. Try it sometime,
[Link]
earthwindfire Deactivated User
257 Posts 10/12
Posted - Apr 15 2014 : 9:09AM
I love how 1% admit to it... hilarious how many are in denial. Hey, I live in Vancouver which as about 2.5 million in the entire metro area. We have around 10,000 sex workers when you add up escorts (low street to high end courtesans), massage rub and tugs, and so on. So, obviously a lot more than 1% are getting some sort of release with a worker.
Chloe Temple Interview
Posted - Apr 1 2014 : 7:18AM
