1. Be specific in the IAFD Direct forum here at ADT.

2. On "one actress whom you won't name" (why?) filmography page at IAFD there is a big "submit corrections" button. Use it and tell us what's wrong. We'll get it fixed.

Cheers,

[Link]

Personally, I do not think compilation films should be included in the years an actress or actor has worked. It's confusing. It's mainly the stars from the 1990s like Alex Dane who look like they're still appearing in adult movies. "Years Active 1994-2007 (Started at 26 years old)"

I'm not sure if she is still working or not. Thanks again for the reply though.

[Link]

The thing about free stuff is you get what you pay for.

If you or any other porn fan wants some degree of accuracy from IAFD you need to contribute by letting them know when you find errors. There are 1,000's of scenes produced every year, that they get as much right as they do, in IMHO, is quite extraordinary.

Edited by - Clam Digger on 5/7/2007 12:52:57 PM

[Link]

Terri -- if you give us a name we can correct it.

That being said, we DON'T consider compilations in calculating the "YEARS ACTIVE" field. Never have.

If you want to know what title skews the field (and maybe we don't have it marked as a comp, so there's a correction!) at the top of the page in the filter section (Sort By), use the dropdown list to select "YEAR" and click "DESCENDING" and then click the "SHOW ME THE MOVIES" button and you'll get the perf's filmography in a recent to oldest way, so you can see what we consider to be their most recent stuff... and if we're wrong you can use the "Submit Corrections" button under it to let us know. :-)

Thanks,

Edited by - Jeff @ IAFD on 5/7/2007 3:16:02 PM

[Link]