I am trying to decide one or the other for a subscription, I like Reality kings 8th street latinas, 40inch plus, flowertuuci ,inthevip ,milfhunter from Bangbros i like assparade and ball honeys,mr camel toe. I guess reality kings does not always use condoms so that is a pro , but bang bros gets some hotter chicks, I am in the air , opinions?
What I like about Brazzers that the girls seem to enjoy themselves. It seems that they can do what they want in a scene. If Brazzers had the build up (fantasy scenarios) of Realitykings it would be the greatest site. What I like about realitykings is the themes. If you have fantasies about an affair with the neighbour or gymscenes realitykings has it (almost) all. However... the sex is mostly very staged. The girls really pose for the camera. A nice exception is In The VIP. The hottest things take place in the nigthclubs ...when they take 1 or 2 girls home it becomes too staged again (of course there are a few exceptions). Edited by - tintintin on 11/28/2007 2:23:18 PM
true but that inthevip site the girls seem to get freaky with each other at the club and they are all willing to do freaky shit to be on camara. the best scene has to be the one with Micha Moore her blonde girl friend Mackienzie miles and a cute asain, whoa that is hot
I've subscribed to both. BangBros has obnoxiously annoying male talent who pretty much ruin all the scenes. They do, however, have consistency with female talent...all of them have been very attractive and do some good scenes. You just have to "block" the annoying chatter that takes place. Reality Kings, OTOH, has stellar talent but more of it is amateur-themed. So you'll see "new girls" there more frequently whereas BangBros gets the industry vets acting new more often. I also find the quality of the vids, and the overall presentation of the sites, better on RK than on BB. Downloads are far faster and the camera work is great....plus no annoying frat-boy antics that take up a third (or more) of the vids the way the BB crap does. I dropped BB....kept Reality Kings. RK does, however, have several "dead" or dormant sites in their network. Not ever site sees frequent updates. The main ones (In the VIP, etc) do however. Pick your "theme" I'd say.
Who ever is in charge of editing at Reality Kings sucks. One the most innovative, imaginative reality sites anyone has ever came up with is Money Talks. But the last 2 updates show how these people don’t have a clue at what they’re doing. First example Dealer fee-Clip 1 has Deer Hunter and Naked Paint Ball both very innovative, imaginative clips that are very well done. And I think would be very expensive to make. Taking a cameraman and crew in to the woods, dressing the girl very sexy. It was 5 minutes long. Naked Paint Ball Again very good and expensive to make. Renting a paint ball range, hiring 7 girls to get naked and play paint ball naked. 6 minutes Clip 2 people doing crazy stuff but only 10 second of a pussy shot. And 11 minutes of these jokers talking about buying a fucking car. Clip 3 A whole clip of these jokers talking about buying a fucking car with one tit flash. Clip 4 Beautiful girl, uninspired fuck with condom. You had 28 minutes of these jokers talking about buying a car and 11 minutes of the best and most expensive stuff. Someone should be fired over that. You go to all that expense and only put 11 minutes of it on an update and 28 minutes of this asshole running his mouth. How stupid is that. The same thing with Pump Service Very short scenes of Naked Roller Derby and Naked Volleyball. Then 25 minutes of these assholes talking to Kendra Secrets followed by an uninspired fuck by Kendra Secrets. How lame do you have to be to not turn on Kendra Secrets. This goes on though out they’re sites. Beautiful girls and lame ass male talent. But Reality Kings is starting to hire some top male talent just not for every scene. I don’t think anyone at Reality Kings or Bang Bros knows how to fuck. If your behind to camera shut the fuck up and hire male talent that knows how to fuck. With all these sites you pretty much have to either turn the sound down or jump to the fucking. This is also why porn producers have to depend on the new girl to sell they’re product. They don’t have the talent to sell it themselves.
pornography wasn't sex but fantasies of an impossibly hospitable world 12377 Posts 9/07
Posted - Nov 30 2007 : 2:43PM
I agree about the male talent and directors talking too much on BB but the actual shots and editing are surprisingly good on there. I think many female performers end up looking their best on BB than on their later gonzo work, this may be because they are so fresh but I think some credit has to go to the cameraman and editor.
the chicks always look hotter on Bang Bros and Reality kings, I think its because they put them in Bikinis or sexy thongs, no bullshit fishnets or funky dresses. Also great make up and they really know how to shoot ass and tits they focus on that. But it is true there male talent for lack of a better word are douce bags that cant fuck for his life
Bang Bros needs some serious changes. It seems the dudes there are all closeted homos, and I've seen many of there films to make that judgment. Preston Parker needs to go. They need to learn to stfu during the scenes as well.
Girls are hot in both websites but I am also not impressed with the male talent. Probably it is safe to say that reality kings is better value. I like Money Talks but Shagdog rightly explained they are ruining that series. cumfiesta is consistently good. There is a girl called Dakoda in one of the latest episodes and she is really hot. I think she also appeared on Bangbus for Bangbros but the cumfiesta scene is much better.
pornography wasn't sex but fantasies of an impossibly hospitable world 12377 Posts 9/07
Posted - Dec 1 2007 : 9:59PM
Can you spot a 'homo' in a line-up? This is the one thing EVERYONE agrees on, don't they pay attention to the feedback?
[Link]
luvinIt912 Deactivated User
250 Posts 3/07
Posted - Dec 2 2007 : 12:54AM
I used to be a huge assparade fan back when D Sanchez was doing it. The ****** frat boys took over and fucked it up. Edited by - luvinit912 on 12/2/2007 12:54:55 AM
[Link]
luvinIt912 Deactivated User
250 Posts 3/07
Posted - Dec 2 2007 : 12:56AM
I concur, especially about fuckin Preston parker. I hate his ass.
As a lesbian pornfan I wait till the day that Milf Nextdoor and WeLiveTogether will be shot by another director. Those girls and Milfs are sooooooooo fffkng hot but the action is always the same routine and the girls always have the same moan. I could write the script Girls meet in shop Girls enter bedroom Girls ask.. have you been with a lesbian before? Girls go in train position Girls pickup dildo's and fuck eachother Girls masturbate in a row Please... do something about this! I mis build up, real erotic wet kissing (kising only takes place in the beginning), arselicking, spitting, nasty talk (not only ahhh ohh and lick my pussy) and the two main girls really enjoying the third girl together. Edited by - tintintin on 12/2/2007 8:03:21 AM
In Milf Nextdoor and WeLiveTogether the girls most of the time are posing for lesbian sex. Nikki in WeLiveTogether will get into from time to time, but not all the time. And that fake moaning. Whats up with that? Drives you crazy. The thing is everything is there beautiful hot ladies great location then you get we're not going to have lesbian sex we're just pretending to. And captain stabbin has ruin more good sex scenes.
I like Reality Kings better because they have cams. If you can ignore the annoying chat most of the time their cams are great and the girls most always keep to the schedule or will have someone fill in for them. Nikki, Molly, Bree and Kristin all have cams and sometimes they have friends on with them. Its great to chat with the girls and then watch them do their thing.
I just can´t stand the BangBros crap. Dudes talking while fucking? That incredibly annoying laughter? Male performers who look average at best and dozens of girls who look like they´re too bored to even move? No, not my cup of tea. Never was, this is "reality porn" at its worst for me. Realitykings was okay, although I had subscribed for Flowertucci.com which isn´t updated anymore. So for me the site is pretty much dead. Where´s the good gonzo porn? - Pretty girls who look like they´re at least remotely into it. - Cameramen who know when to shut up - a "yeeeeah, dude, nice!" isn´t necessary, I KNOW THAT IT`S HOT. - Male performers who don´t look like the girls they fuck wouldn´t touch them in a million years off the set. - Female performers that don´t fake their moaning, PLEASE. If the guy barely touches your leg and you´re going "OOOOAOAOAOOOOAAA, YEAH, JUST LIKE THAT" already I find myself closing the player and cancelling my subscription.
[Link]
rambo99ca Deactivated User
ca 406 Posts 3/06
Posted - Dec 3 2007 : 5:00PM
Their both garbage nowdays, not sure whats going on but theres very little swallowing these days, at least Bang bros still has "bigmouthfulls" i guess, tugjobs use to be great when the girls ate their reward at the end but now they clean it up with a towel. Reality Kings are full of a bunch of dodgers.
luvinIt912 for pres in 2008 on another note...ya know that they are both owned by the same holding company. Edited by - james_bomb on 12/4/2007 12:16:28 AM
[Link]
tritone Deactivated User
1009 Posts 4/03
Posted - Dec 4 2007 : 3:12AM
Here is one thing I wish both sites would start doing: Offering really large resolution photo shoots. All bangbros stuff is either 80 hex 600 or 80 hex 533 and RK is 80 hex 533 and recently 90 hex 600. In these days of 20+ inch LCD monitors these tiny pictures SUCK. It would be such a treat to see all those old Bangbros image sets in a truly large resoltions. The content is quite good. RK gets a bonus with me because they offer their sets as ZIP files, but I find that while the quality & content of the photography is good, there are TOO MANY pictures in their sets and they would be better off having fewer, but much LARGER pictures. Incidentally, Brazzers does the same thing as RK: They pack a photoset with hundreds of small, mostly redundant photos (90 hex 600) that give the feeling of "video" motion as you browse through them. But in my opinion, that is wasteful. It is much better to have smaller sets of more distinct, but very large images. Say 150-300 of images 160 hex 1067 pixels or above instead of 500+ tiny 80 hex 533 pics. Edited by - tritone on 12/4/2007 3:14:50 AM Edited by - tritone on 12/4/2007 3:15:36 AM
I was watching some guy on BangBros, he had the biggest dick you'd ever see but he's never hard, just thought I'd throw that in. Bangbros is ok, but it isn't the best site around but it all depends on what your after. I always liked pornstarnetwork.com but a lot of the stuff isn't new, but its still pretty good.
If you are downloading the ZIP files, then the sizes of the complete sets should stay the same if they were to follow my suggestion and cut the fat. Provide fewer images, but make them LARGER.
[Link]
tritone Deactivated User
1009 Posts 4/03
Posted - Dec 4 2007 : 4:46PM
Check out this image of Teya from a Recent Reality Kings shoot: The published image size is 90 hex 600. You can't tell me wouldn't want to see that ass in a huge resolution picture. I'm talking like 180 hex 1200, 160 hex 1067, or even higher. Its not like they can't do it! The cameras masters are least 300 hex pixels large. They are only using this size because they are trying to fit the "average" screen resolution out there which is commonly reported as 1024x768. They would make my day if they started catering to those of us who have huge screens and large resolutions. We want to see these sexy ladies fill up our entire screen!
I say bangbros for the hottest chicks, but they use the same lame guys.... :-( I therefore have a membership at Realitykings... Both sites are having ONE huge problem: they don't update their old movies... You have to download 3-6 clips instead of 1 full download... VERY annoying!
And occasionally the downloads are broken or missing. And reporting problems with missing content seems to fall on deaf ears on both sites. (i've reported like 5-6 broken pages/downloads, 3 months later still no fix.) Both suck. 21sextury.com (assholefever,dpfanatics,hornyeurosluts) or the indexxxed.com(allinternal,asstraffic,spermswap) much better. I even hear indexxxed.com are gonna offer movies in 1080i/p AND will be updating most of their backlog of movies to 1080i/p aswell.
You can't knock their success, that's for sure. I realize I am a little biased here, but, my latest project is going to blow these two away. iBangPornstars.com Just an average guy, banging hot pornstars on the weekends. Lucky me, again.
2 great sites but have some problems with both that everyone here agrees on, and I have sent them feedback exactly the same and they still keep doing the same things? wtf? Like STFU and updating older vids. Lots of the older MikeInBrazil vids I have wanted in higher quality for a long time. My favourite is InTheVIP in the nightclub. This is some of the hottest stuff around with great camera work upskirt and girls looking like genuinely getting it on and off together in a nightclub. But then for some absurd reason they take the girls away to some jokers bedroom to fuck so it ends up just like every other sex scene. Why not fuck the girls in the nightclub? In a room somewhere so you have the music and the same feel and then could maybe cut to shots of the girls nextdoor during the sex? "Incidentally, Brazzers does the same thing as RK: They pack a photoset with hundreds of small, mostly redundant photos (90 hex 600) that give the feeling of "video" motion as you browse through them. But in my opinion, that is wasteful. It is much better to have smaller sets of more distinct, but very large images. Say 150-300 of images 160 hex 1067 pixels or above instead of 500+ tiny 80 hex 533 pics." Totally agree. I luv hi-res 'life-size' pics :) And STFU - I think everyone has been saying this for years but they still do it. I recently saw a scene from EatSomeAss with Jenni Lee where she told the cameraman to shut the fuck up saying something like "What do you think the viewers want to hear? Me sucking this cock or you voice?". If the pornstars themselves can figure it out why can't the directors. One new thing that does really bug me about BB is they have started to do widescreen which is great but are adding horizontal black bars which is horrible! Serves no purpose, on a 4:3 monitor they will be put there by default and on a widescreen just makes it black bars all around the video.
I am curious, I checked your site... Sounds ok, but it says nothing about the videos... Can we download them or not??? That's the question I am wondering about....
I don't like the WMV- too much pixelized... I don't understand why they don't choose mpeg2 (I don't know any web site that do that). Even SuzeRandall choose a bad format such as WMV... How are the Bangbros DVD ? is there an email to ask for a specific scene from their web site to be released on DVD ? I like so much the Jenni Lee scene Reading is FUNdamental from Bangbros web site http://www.bangbrosnetwork.com/t1/pps=mainpage/free_movies_pictures_bangbros/sg1375.html and I don't understand why they didn't release one scene of Jenni Lee in their different DVD series... (one of them is the Street Ranger series- Vol.5 is out on DVD and still no Jenni Lee....) that would make me believe that they didn't read the comments and or rate of people who are subscriber to the bangbros web site...