New Pornstar Interviews - [more]
Tiny Khloe: 2026 Exxxotica Interview

"I’m attracted to people’s intelligence. I like some substance. I want to be able to hold a conversation."
All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 660 > Reviews, posts & spamming
AuthorPost
Gonad
Member


7 Posts
8/04
Posted - Dec 20 2004 : 5:36AM
Hi

I'm sorry if this has been mentioned before, but as a regular reader I'm starting to wonder if some of the reviews here are placed by the studios, or people connected with the studios.

I'm starting to beleive this by: reviewers concentrating on 1 studio, always positive, and most importantly something not smelling quite right in the text. This is hard to define, but...

I suppose this is attractive to studios, as it's free publicity.

While I'm on the subject, I think some of the posts fall into this category too.

This kind of thing could have a very adverse affect on this site, in my view.

Hurrab
Member

Denmark, EU
256 Posts
3/03
Posted - Dec 20 2004 : 6:38AM
It's my impression that our moderators and administrators are doing everything they can to detect and remove such reviews and posts, but there might be a few ones that they don't catch.
BigBobxxx
Senior Member

2681 Posts
5/04
Posted - Dec 20 2004 : 7:59AM
People generally watch and review what they like.

People generally post and discuss things they like (and care about).
People will also post concerning things they really dislike too.

Experienced porn lovers (like you will typically encounter here on Adult DVD Talk) have long histories of being burned by poor quality and falsely advertised crap, so it's not all that surprising that we will speak well of films, studios and stars that consistently deliver quality porn of the type(s) we like.

Most of us in the ADT Community already know who the flagrant self-promotors are. It is, in fact, against ADT policy for industry people to post their own reviews:
Adult DVD Talk Review FAQ

You will often see ADT regulars call out the bullshitters.
If we don't, the mods are very good at supervising their forums. And, when all else fails, Steph and Drew run a great and clean forum that is respected by fans and industry alike. They do not tolerate abuse of this forum.

You can trust the integrity of the reviews here :)

If you want something more "brutal," go to the AMRI and search for reviews by Patrick Riley

astroknight All-Star Supporter
Questionable Moderator

Tastes so good...
4187 Posts
11/99
Posted - Dec 20 2004 : 11:17AM
I know quite a few of the reviewers here (including meeting several of them in person). I think I know who you're talking about, and no, they're not working for the studios. As BigBob said, people often review what they like and often gravitate towards it. There are also some studios which are incredibly consistent in their product, and if that works for you then you're going to have a very consistent review. I know I'm that way with most of Pat Myne and Christoph Clark's work, just to name a couple.

That said, some people also don't like to give a negative review because it brings them down or some other reason. Personally, I hate to see this because I think the negative reviews are as important or more important than the positive ones. After reading a few reviews from somebody if you know what they both like and dislike, you can better tell from a review if a movie should work for you or not. If I only see raving fanboy reviews from somebody, I normally don't even check them out because I can't make a good judgement on the title. Also, I know of a few studios that pay a lot of attention to reviews looking for ways to improve their product. Wonderfully positive reviews are always liked, but well written negative reviews that say why somebody didn't like a movie (rather than just "This sucks") are loved because it gives them an idea on how to improve things. The why is the key to a negative review (and sometimes they're more fun to write because you can really let loose on somebody if you see them not giving a shit about the people buying the product).

"Vegetarianism for me is about saying ‘yes’ to things - even meat." - Coupling

Janitor
Retired

Porno movies, sexy videos, xxx. Adult DVD Talk at your service.
6409 Posts
11/99
Posted - Dec 20 2004 : 11:40AM
Gonad, we spend a lot of time (too much actually) looking into reviews possibly written by studio reps, boyfriends of stars, etc. I don't blindly approve reviews. There are many I have not posted because I suspected they came from someone related to the movie. The regular reviewers are very trustworthy. Some are simply fans of a director, studio, performer, whatever.

Yes, there are definitely forum posts that are essentially spam. We do deactivate people that we can prove work within the industry and are pretending to be fans. Sadly it happens a lot. Even worse when industry people come here to trash other industry people, or to argue with themselves. I have the utmost respect for the industry people who have always been honest and conducted themselves professionally.

There's a heck of a lot of information on Adult DVD Talk. Like anywhere you gather information look at the source, get a second opinion, etc.

 
astroknight All-Star Supporter
Questionable Moderator

Tastes so good...
4187 Posts
11/99
Posted - Dec 20 2004 : 1:12PM
As an extra note on Steph's part, there's plenty of opportunities for industry people on Adult DVD Talk outside of just posting here and there, such as this week's Guest Poll by Bryan Xin...

"Vegetarianism for me is about saying ‘yes’ to things - even meat." - Coupling

howie
Member

144 Posts
11/03
Posted - Dec 20 2004 : 7:05PM
Gonad:

Speaking as a reviewer and an industry outsider, I contribute reviews to ADT in an attempt to be informative to fellow consumers, especially with your purchasing/renting decisions.

I agree with the point about reviewers having a slight bias as to performers or directors but it is those preferences that drives the purchasing and viewing habits, especially my own. For instance, I'm not going to watch a S&M movie and write a review just for the hell of it.

I believe the reviewers do a very good job in expressing their likes and dislikes in the body of the review so as to support their rating.

Gonad
Member

7 Posts
8/04
Posted - Dec 21 2004 : 5:04AM
In posting this feedback, it was just a desire to say 'this is how I'm starting to regard some of the content here' but at the same time I appreciate the extreme difficulty in controlling an open forum that (to some extent) requires people to maintain a level of annonmyity.

Clearly the administrators are well aware of this problem, or at least the possibility of a problem.

Thank you to everyone who took the time to reply :-)

Hurrab
Member

Denmark, EU
256 Posts
3/03
Posted - Dec 21 2004 : 8:37AM
Thank you!

By the way, I think it's a good thing that many of the industry people posting in here are displaying the name of their company below the user name instead of "Member" (e.g. Brandon Iron - Platinum X Pictures instead of Brandon Iron - Member)!

DenverDon
Benevolent

Firmly Embedded in Depravity
5914 Posts
7/02
Posted - Dec 21 2004 : 3:23PM
Hurrab,

Basically it is a requirement and courtesy. Following is a quote from the intro to ADT for company reps and performers:




Jump To: