I'm almost certain someone has asked this before but could you direct me to some pornstars where you can see their ribcage on display. Now here's the wierd bit, i'm not really after really skinny girls where it's obvious you'd get the ribcage sticking out. Rather a nice curvy pornstar who when she's stretched out really displays a nice set of ribs! Weird right?
What I LOVE is when you can clearly see her ribs, and they make her firm natural boobs stand out with more contrast... you can see the exact lines where her fleshy tits meet her bony ribcage... there's no body-fat to blur the line.
[Link]
married_lucky Deactivated User
202 Posts 11/06
Posted - Jan 23 2007 : 10:54AM
Please no! I never want to see bones! Eat or lift weights.
if you like ribcages and hip bones (yum), try looking at a lot of the non-American "nude" sites or newsgroups. Stuff like MetArt, Galitsin, HegreArchives, etc. most are (i think) eastern european/russian women who don't look like they're 40 and aren't fat or overweight at all. sure every once in a while, you can find a chunky girl, but it's really uncommon to see girls who aren't in good, boney shape.
For an athletic looking girl who gives some heavy rib shots while in action, make sure to check out Shot at Home's Summer and Scott 1 . Rib fans can catch a few glimpses of what I'm talking about in the stills that are included in the listing over at Shot at Home.
"Vegetarianism for me is about saying ‘yes’ to things - even meat." - Coupling
[Link]
Ejac Deactivated User
851 Posts 9/04
Posted - Feb 3 2007 : 3:21PM
That's not a very PC thing to say, especially on this board.
I think some folks here are misinterpreting (perhaps intentionally?) what the OP is saying. A girl doesn't have to be anorexic in order for her ribs to be slightly visible in a certain kind of lighting. I've seen girls who have plenty of meat on them in which the ribs were still somewhat visible and I agree with the OP. I think it's pretty appealing, visually. Same with women's backs.
Really, I think some folks are either just trying to be funny or something.
Ya know...it's funny. My sister has been about the same weight since she was 14 - about 155 pounds. She's 5' 8". This is not fat. Nevertheless, she's been called fat by people who apparently have never seen a truly fat person in their lives. So she has self-esteem problems and believes she's fat because one guy out of every 100 guys calls her "fat".
And if "fat" chicks are happy being the way they are, they don't need to do anything. If you don't like 'em, there are plenty of slender women in porn.
It's not PC because women are generally very sensitive about their weight and many women think they're overweight even when they aren't. So, when there are comments like that, the next thing you know, you have a woman who used to be just right at 120-150 pounds who now only weighs 90 pounds.
It's not that I mind or I want to tell women what kind of body they should have. I just know that kind of weight loss can't possibly be healthy. People have died because of this. I just want the women to be as happy as they can possibly be.
[Link]
Ejac Deactivated User
851 Posts 9/04
Posted - Feb 3 2007 : 8:34PM
Random, glancing at the read versus reply count, this thread is attracting a lot of attention. I won't conclude as to why... maybe some are just afraid to speak up, or maybe they're just checking back for url's or something.
Of course, I agree with the example that you made concerning your sister. I don't neccessarily like them bone-skinny either. But in what direction should we be moving? There seems to be a lot of information floating around concerning epidemic rises of overweight people, not just in America, but now, France among other places in the world. I live in an area where the morbidly obese rate is so much higher than norm. Yet, people tell others that they look great, healthy, fantastic even, just to not hurt feelings.
I'm all for variety - I can't classify a girl that I'm seeing as model thin, not close to it, she has a fabulous figure. But when bellies role or arms are as thick as my leg, something's gotta be said, and done for healths sake - PC or not. Finding the right information is a good place to start.
I haven't seen anything remotely approaching that kind of obesity in mainstream porn. If I did see a girl who I actually thought was fat, I wouldn't say her name or even give any hints. But I would say that I'd seen it. The only time I see truly fat women in porn is in the niche that exists for people who like that. I just think it's ridiculous to call someone fat when they aren't. And when someone says a girl who isn't fat needs to lose weight, other girls start looking at themselves and thinking "well, she's not any or much bigger than me. I must be fat too" and there you go. Next thing you know, girls are spending hours on treadmills, puking up their dinner, taking pills. They lose weight all right. Trouble is the weight they were at before they decided they needed to lose some is probably closer to their ideal weight (for their body type) than what they are when they lose 30 pounds.
I don't have a problem with slender girls being seen as attractive. I like some of them myself. What bugs me is when women feel like they HAVE TO BE extremely slender in order to be attractive and that just isn't so. If she's 5' 5" and weighs over 200 pounds, that's a problem. If she's 5' 4" and 130 pounds, she's not fat....not even close.
I've started some threads "where are the skinny girls" and it always degenerates into a discuission of whether it is attractive. Give it a rest and just gives us leads. We don't criticize whne you come asking for your hermaphrodite Tub Girl dwarf transexual fetish. Now, really skinny: Mica Innosence/Innocense/Daisy Dahl Kitty
[Link]
conquistador Deactivated User
Hellhamster. 2947 Posts 10/03
Posted - Jun 17 2007 : 1:41PM
hermaphrodite Tub Girl dwarf transexual ?!?! I must have missed that thread.
To the OP, Here is a thread I started awhile back that some people helped out with girls... mod: changed URL text into link to correct page formatting Edited by - hardware on 6/18/2007 5:15:46 PM
Honestly...rib cages aren't hard to find at all in today's porn. That might have something to do with the fact that threads dedicated to the search for them always turn into a debate about whether or not it's attractive. I haven't really got a problem with it but it's a touchy subject. If I praise a slender girl, I feel that I might be making other girls who look just fine think they need to lose weight. Females are often sensitive about their weight anyway, without anyone saying anything. A woman can be her own worst critic...to the point to where she looks perfectly fine to everyone else but she doesn't really think she does.....and never will. It's hard to sanction a sexual fixation that could make that sort of thing worse. That's all.
[Link]
AlexPanzer Deactivated User
1593 Posts 6/03
Posted - Jun 18 2007 : 11:51PM
I like ribcages, pelvic bones and spines especially when fashion models are naked. Wanna see something odd and somewhat disturbing? Then, at your own risk, google "pelvic bone", click on "Images" and click on pic #3. Viewer Beware!!!
I agree. Angel Dark is a good example (even before her recent weight loss). Her body early in her career was grade-AAA perfection. Nice curves, flat stomach, big natural tits... and when a guy bent her over and took her doggy-style, you could clearly see her ribs on the sides of her chest, and her back muscles, with the skin stretched tight from her tits hanging down. I don't go for the all-skinny types, but the combo of natural curves with no body fat on her ribs and a completely flat stomach is irresistible.
The world needs more people like us who don't disrespect pretty girls by telling them to 'eat a burger'. Living and working in California requires no body fat whatsoever, being fat in that kind of heat is definitely not healthy, you need to drink a lot of water that's all.
What the hell? If you like skinny girls, that's fine. Nobody cares. Just say so. But I don't think there's any evidence to support what you said. Being fat (as in huge) is not good under any circumstances. Having some body fat is healthy and normal for a woman.
What a bunch of horse shit! Look. If you like the malnourished, famine-stricken look, knock yourself out. I do think your taste SUCKS, but you're entitled to it. Just don't try to present it as some "health" issue or act like you're "concerned" for anyone's well being. Bullshit like this is the reason perfectly healthy girls end up in hospitals. Did I mention your taste sucks? Edited by - tonebone on 1/11/2009 11:47:15 AM
I'm talking about ideal weight from healthy diet and exercise. But your kind want to make me think that so called 'BBW' is some kind of healthy norm. The american food industry has lobbied hard to make it ok to be too big, because if you're not you need to eat more deep-fried processed shit. Of course it's an unhealthy lifestyle making people overweight. Politically incorrect? I don't see why. It's not ok to smoke or drink too much, but it's perfectly fine to glutton on a daily basis... Edited by - Gunzo on 1/11/2009 3:08:23 PM
^Oh yawn. No one here is saying that BBW is the ideal. Some are saying it's ok, or acceptable, but that's a different thing. But to say that having "no body fat whatsoever" is ok is a steaming heap of crap. Why don't you read up on Body Mass Index (BMI), in particular its shortcomings, and the formulas created to address those shortcomings: Fat-Free Mass Index (FFMI) and Fat Mass Index (FMI). You'll notice that they all recognize being particularly skinny as dangerous to one's health. Even in Southern California.
Not like I mean 0% body fat, which is impossible. The funny thing about BMI though is that below 18 used to be considered underweight, today that number is 20, because people are getting increasingly fatter so the scale has been updated to reflect this. That's crazy.
Bullshit. You're not talking about an "ideal" anything. You're talking about the kind of figure a woman would only get if she ate just one solid meal a day. "My kind" never said anything about fat being beautiful. There is a whole middle range between anorexic and overweight that most women fall into. The likes of you try to present the starved skeletal look as "healthy", while labeling perfectly healthy women as "fat". Fortunately for you there are plenty of anorexic, malnourished women in porn. I'm talking about women so "healthy" you would mistake them for a 10 year old from behind! Jerk off to them all you want, just stop trying to push your fetish on the rest of us.
Yeah, that would be crazy, if it was true. But it isn't. Two things about that sentence are false. First, since the BMI became a standard, the "underweight" classification has been, and still is, anything below 18.5. The only adjustment that has been made across the board is that the threshold measure for "overweight" was brought down from 28.5 to 25 in 1998. So, from the induction of the BMI until now, there are actually more people considered "too big" than there were before. There hasn't been any adjustment on the bottom end. Second, even on adjustments that have been made, they have never been made because "people are getting increasingly fatter". That's ridiculous. Healthy weight doesn't change because there are fewer healthy people. Case in point was the adjustment in 1998. They didn't raise the number to accommodate fatter people, they actually lowered the number to accommodate the medical research that was showing that the number was too high. Similar (but not across the board) adjustments have been made in certain populations, again based on the medical research (see the paragraph about the BMI Expert Consultation for Asian populations on the BMI Global Database page of the World Health Organization). So, um, nice try. Thanks for lying *cough* I mean trying.
Doctors make their own interpretations, but thanks for googling. If you were to land on 18,5, any doctor and everyone you know would tell you to gain weight, but even though it's proven that fat around the waist is seriously unhealthy, it's unlikely that the same persons would dare to go against the junk food and beer industries. Google that if you wish. Being skinny is not unhealthy unless you're suffering from a mental disorder or live in prison camp, one meal a day as long as it has enough energy is perfect. The McDiet leaves people fat and malnourished since it's shitty food...
^Anyone with any brains will tell you that several small meals is better than one big one. Where do you come up with this stuff? And I'm not talking about the McDiet. Of course it's a bad idea. Who would argue with you on that? Of course it leaves people fat and malnourished. That's why there are so many fat, malnourished people out there. I'm talking about small, healthy meals that provide enough energy as is required. Anyway, what does that have to do with you being convinced that too skinny isn't actually too skinny? Being too skinny is unhealthy, especially because it usually means you are malnourished. But even supposing you aren't malnourished, but you're too skinny anyway... there are other health risks simply associated with being too skinny. I'll send you back to google and suggest you try out "skinny" and "healthy" and learn about some of them. As for your other stuff, about doctors making their own interpretations, and people telling you you're too thin if you hit 18.5, blah blah blah... Again, what the fuck does any of that have to do with being too skinny? BMI of 16 or so is too thin, regardless of what anyone tells someone who's at 18.5. I fail to see your point. And I frequently speak against the junk food and beer industries, as well as many others, and I think that excess fat in the midsection is unhealthy too (who doesn't?). But that still doesn't mean I don't think there's such a thing as too skinny.
^ Too skinny is when you lack strength to do whatever it is you need to do. You can be perfectly healthy at a BMI of 16, but doctors will then say 'What will happen if you're in an accident or get sick?'. So those points are obviously just a 'safety zone'. And yes, of course I googled this. The BMI itself is disputed so I don't see why it should carry such legitimacy anyways. Anyhow, it's obviously not very PC to dig skinny chicks. Obviously. Might as well be into necrophilia, right?
Many studies have documented the relationship between skinny women and low sex drive. "As soon as body weight plummets below a critical point, the womb shrinks, menstruation stops and the level of sexual interest, fantasy and enjoyment fall Orgasms fail to occur." This is the reason you never see orgasms in porn, or even natural lubrication.
I know two women who've had to gain weight to conceive. They were good consumers who fell for the hype "you can't be too skinny" Too thin to conceive is unhealthy. It's great to see women being realistic about weight. I can go back to watching television. No more will women be able to lose weight and thereby get a career boost. What the hell were we thinking, or was it us? Some people are tall, some are short. Some are genetically disposed to have less body fat, some have more. Both can be fit and healthy.
LMAO! Honestly. At this point you're just embarrassing yourself. Everything you've said in this thread reeks of misinformation and stupidity. If we're talking science (not that you would know it if it hit you in the ass), a very recent study has shown that the normal amount of fat deposits in the buttocks help women ward off Type 2 Diabetes. This is just a recent finding. Anyone with even a rudimentary knowledge of biology understands that the curvy, hourglass shape attracts men precisely because it is an indicator of health and fertility. Women can't develop that kind of figure if they're sick or malnourished. You have the misfortune of being stuck with a fetish for an unhealthy body type, and you're twisting yourself into a pretzel trying to defend the indefensible with ridiculous assertions that fly in the face of common sense. Give it up while you're behind.
Being naturally skinny is probably not all that unhealthy (though it probably does depend on how skinny). I think you (and maybe I) are confused. Fat on the stomach is not the same as fat on the hips. Women are supposed to have that fat on the hips. Not only is it healthy for them but it's also the main thing that makes a woman look like a woman instead of a man with boobs. It tends to be appealing to men because this is one of the subconscious signs that a woman is ready and healthy enough to breed. Pregnancy takes a lot out of a woman and she really needs to have a certain amount of fat going in. Problems arise when women who are just naturally a little larger try to lose too much weight. What happens is that they may well lose their stomach but they lose their hips too. Women who want to be really skinny (and men who like that) are fighting nature. Bad idea.
Excuse this on-topic post... I love "normal-sized" girls who show ribcage as a result of their body movements. Say, showing some ribcage as they arch their backs when cumming (or doing a credible job of acting like their cumming). OK then, back to the "discussion"...
There are plenty of threads for people like you who are exclusively into big women. I don't wreck those threads just because I think you're advocating an unhealthy lifestyle. Nobody cares if you think you know how a woman is supposed to look like...
Posted - Jan 21 2007 : 3:29PM
