Rocco never had an agent. Why would you like to contact him? He doesn't work for anybody but himself. You can't book him. If you like to buy his product. Just go to a shop. Steve Holmes
Speaking of Rocco, I just checked out one of his compiliation dvds...he and celeste really lit up the screen.
[Link]
conquistador Deactivated User
Hellhamster. 2947 Posts 10/03
Posted - Apr 1 2008 : 7:32PM
You tried smoke signals or semaphore yet?
[Link]
franco Deactivated User
766 Posts 1/08
Posted - Apr 1 2008 : 8:48PM
steve, I had a couple projects for him. I spoke with the Indian guy that used to produce for him but he was trying to do the projects himself. ANyway, I could email what it is and you can contact him
Well, Rocco's an international star so it's possible. Though I doubt the page is maintained by Rocco personally. I think most celebs have somebody who handles that stuff.
Patience is a virtue, but who wants to be virtuous? 4283 Posts 4/00
Posted - Apr 3 2008 : 11:55AM
:) Yes. I go through my Tricia page, although I admit that lately unless someone attaches some sort of hello to their friend request, I'm less likely to accept them. Jonni, Jazz, Jake, Belladonna, Christoph, HJ (nevaquit), Harmony Films and Manuel all have real pages. I haven't confirmed if the Nacho page is really Nacho. And my secretary and I share the responsibility for the Evil Angel and Fashionistas movies pages.
cool I will add you as a friend with a message attached of course... Belladonna has a kick ass page she does a great job on the layout. Manuel and Jazz page seem so normal i thought they might be fake. but thanks for the confrimation
I ran across his website a few months ago! I think there might be a email/comment selection which you might be able to leave him a message on. Just use his full name plus .com.
Just out of curiosity, when are we going to crown Rocco as the best male performer ever? OK. I haven't seen much classic porn (70s and 80s) so I can't say "ever". But Rocco is definitely the best male performer (especially in terms of consistency) that I can personally think of since I really started getting heavy into porn in the mid 90s. Edited by - randomprecision on 4/4/2008 12:28:48 PM
Tricia - Reminds me of the good old days. I think I rented porn about twice a week and it seems like I never came home without a Rocco or a Christoph flick. Just opening the case and seeing those red tapes was something I'll always remember. It was always so exciting, just knowing I could count on a couple of hours of solid porn quality. I would rent about 5-6 movies at a time but I always watched the Evil Angel ones first. Unfortunately (or fortunately, maybe), that often meant at least a couple of the movies from other companies went back to the store unwatched. That's not to say EA isn't as good now. I just haven't had a whole lot of money to spend on porn past few years. And even though DVDs are obviously better, I miss those red tapes.
[Link]
Blink Deactivated User
78 Posts 2/08
Posted - Apr 4 2008 : 2:56PM
Hmm, is this the same RP who posted the following back in January? "Anal sex also requires you to take it slow and easy. It's great for fantasy to think about shoving it in but that can definitely cause problems. You're not just dealing with the sphincter. You also have to consider the blood vessels and the mucosa. Even if you do everything right, anal sex without minor tearing of the anal mucosa is almost impossible." (link to post) I no longer have any vids featuring Rocco. What I do remember about him though is that he was always too rough. That was even the case back in the better days of the porn biz, when they were much more careful about anal sex.Evil Angel is one of the companies that has been promoting the "rough and painful" anal sex trend. The Medical Aspects Of Anal Sex
Apparently. As I say, my opinions change with the weather. But I was speaking about the contrasts between what we enjoy in fantasy and the uncomfortable realities. I like rough anal sex but have no choice but to acknowledge it has it's drawbacks and risks. As you say, Rocco may have been "too rough" for reality but the girls who worked with him apparently chose to take their chances. It would be difficult to argue that they didn't know he was known for that. I've known people in RL who regularly took fists up their ass. And while I'm sure they'll eventually pay for it, they do what they like. Basically, I was trying to make sure that people don't have any illusions about what is actually happening onscreen. I don't care if people like rough anal. But if someone wants to argue that it's perfectly harmless, they need a reality check. The girls should know what they're doing and what the risks are. If people know the risks and they're willing to take them, that's their business. In the end, I'm saying that there's nothing wrong with putting accurate information out there. In fact, it should be out there where the girls can see it before they decide to do anything. Some things aren't completely harmless. It's true. But if the industry had to work within the constraints of not doing anything that could be harmful, it would be basically impossible to make porn that most people would buy. Completely safe porn would be about as exciting as watching the weather forecast. Edited by - randomprecision on 4/4/2008 3:37:04 PM
Anyway. As male performers go (anal or otherwise), Rocco is in a class by himself. Maybe he's too rough for your taste. But even without the roughness, he would still be a great performer.
[Link]
Blink Deactivated User
78 Posts 2/08
Posted - Apr 4 2008 : 4:06PM
The problem with fantasizing about harmful sexual activities is that it can be indicative of a mental disorder: sexual sadism. That may not be so bad on its own, but some people demand more of those harmful activities, either indrectly through purchases or directly through requests/promotion/misinformation (as seen here and elsewhere online). Sexual sadism can also inspire people to go further and actually emulate said activities. Coupled with sociopathy / antisocial personality disorder (lack of remorse/empathy/conscience), this is particularly dangerous.Those drawbacks and risks don't yet seem to be common knowledge, despite the fact that anal sex has been steadily growing in popularity. Anorectal problems are also on the rise, which has been correlated (I know, correlation != causation) with anal sex. That being the case, it is at the very least irresponsible to promote rough anal sex.I do, because some impressionable people are either unable or unwilling to separate fantasy from reality (see my last few posts in the rectal problems thread). Porn isn't helping matters; it's promoting the notions that frequent and/or rough anal sex is a good idea and that every woman should be expected to engage in it.I suppose we can agree there.
Patience is a virtue, but who wants to be virtuous? 4283 Posts 4/00
Posted - Apr 4 2008 : 4:29PM
I'll have to disagree. While most of our movies do include anal sex, and many of those have anal sex that is rough, we don't try to show girls that don't like anal sex. If it looks too painful for them, we'd rather they not be doing anal.
I think this is a discussion for another thread. I'm not interested in arguing with you. Particularly not in this thread.
[Link]
Blink Deactivated User
78 Posts 2/08
Posted - Apr 4 2008 : 6:10PM
Oh? That wasn't the case as recently as 2006. Mia Rose's anal scene in "This Butt's 4U 2" from Evil Angel was clearly painful as well as rough. I don't know about newer stuff, though; I began avoiding all anal-penetrative activities some months prior to that scene (and Mia Rose after that scene). Regardless, rough anal sex is a bad idea even if the recipient isn't in pain (or hides it).
She looks like she is loving EVERY second of it in that flick
[Link]
Blink Deactivated User
78 Posts 2/08
Posted - Apr 4 2008 : 11:17PM
I don't care if Mia Rose herself comes in here and contradicts me. I recognize the signs of pain when I see and hear them. She did NOT have painless anal sex in that video.
Rocco Siffredi @ AEBN
Posted - Apr 1 2008 : 2:17PM