Murray Head Member
263 Posts 9/02
| Posted - Nov 3 2002 : 8:49PMI just watched 2 Rodney vids,the new goo girls and an I Swallow vid.Both had 2 cute enough girls and as a bonus they both took anal. It seems in the last few years Rodney has gone more towards oral and less pure sex.I think he's got a great thing going,his shooting style makes it seem very intimate.I love it when he gets a cute regular girl(one timer or non pro)and magic happens.Especially since most of the time his girls are butt ugly.Is he based in Seattle?I refuse to believe that's the best he can come up with.If he could make more movies of cute college girls giving it up he would be the bomb IMO.Is there any Rodney vids I've missed or similar styled vids from other directors?I'm pretty familiar with all the labels and such,and please don't say Ed Powers! [Link] |
cal444 Independent Editor CalCutterPost.com
927 Posts 10/01
| Posted - Nov 4 2002 : 12:03AM
I am biased but, A Perverted Point of View, should be right up your alley the girls are hot and the camera is totally on point. Read any of Rog's reviews you'll find he agrees. Rodney's stuff is pretty cool.Cal Somewhere pimping  [Link] |
PornManiac Deactivated User
aka Steve K 325 Posts 7/02
| Posted - Nov 4 2002 : 7:16AM
yea if you dig Rodney's movies, you should love PPOV from Diabolic. [Link] |
Murray Head Member
263 Posts 9/02
| Posted - Nov 4 2002 : 9:58AM
Sure I do rent PPOV from time to time but usually those are established performers.There is something about Rodney's style,just the way he films it's like a slower pace to the action in a way.And PPOV would be great if you guys could get first timers as well.I don't think Ed Powers should have the market to himself on first timers and one time only girls.He obviously doesn't put much money into his product(as far as cameras and equipment)judging by the recent low quality.I wanna see more people grab a cam and scour the campuses! [Link] |
M.B. Senior Member
1679 Posts 2/01
| Posted - Nov 4 2002 : 10:05AM
I wish Anabolic, Diabolic or Red Light would make a series where you would at least occasionally see a girls entire body while she is having sex. I've gotten kind of sick of watching a movie and thinking "move back already, why is the camera so close". Moore has a lot of close ups during BJ's but Ive also noticed that during intercourse the camera will sometimes be far enough back to catch the whole girls body on the screen. I wish more directors would do this. [Link] |
| |
|
mike john Mike John Productions
389 Posts 8/02
| Posted - Nov 4 2002 : 11:02AM
Hey MB exactly which anabolic diabolic titles are you refering to. I personally include many wide shots in all my movies including PPOV. Just wondering. Mike John [Link] |
menace Member
Of all the fishes in the sea, the mermaid is the one for me! 410 Posts 6/02
| Posted - Nov 4 2002 : 11:20AM
I've always liked Rodney, his shit's funny & sexy. And he's had some pretty good looking girls, too (Chelsea Blue, Shanna Macollough, Alex Dane, Nicki Nice). Even the ones that aren't knockouts are still good scenes. I've got a lot of his stuff. But, I think Mike John is the current master of the POV style! I think he mixes in enough wide shots to give plenty of variety & still get the POV feel. Red Light's approach in Raincoater 2 is interesting in that it accents the girl's dirty talking with little (or no) talking from the guy. More of a semi-interactive approach to make you feel like YOU'RE the guy fucking her. Oddly, though, I found that some of the girls may have been talking just a little too much! (don't get me wrong-I still liked it a whole lot!) Edited by - menace on 11/4/2002 11:31:23 AM  [Link] |
cal444 Independent Editor CalCutterPost.com
927 Posts 10/01
| Posted - Nov 4 2002 : 3:35PM
M.B. I think our camera guys mix it up pretty good and they're more often than not in the right place at the right time. Cal Somewhere doing something
 [Link] |
M.B. Senior Member
1679 Posts 2/01
| Posted - Nov 4 2002 : 3:41PM
--Mike--Personally I don't like "point of view" movies (I'm not specificaly reffering to your series but ALL point of view movies). The BJ's look great but when it comes to the penetrations it just doesn't capture enough of the sex. Many movies in general seem to be fixated with showing sex where you cannot see the whole girls body. I enjoy your series (especially DTH), Erik's stuff (2 on 1 and Un-Natural Sex), and the Gangbang series Anabolic and Diabolic put out. However, I find that there are way too many close shots (I'm not just talking about shots where all you can see is the pussy/ass and cock) but the shots where you get the girls face down to her pussy/ass/upper thigh, but no legs etc. One of the reasons I like Brandon Iron's Rampage series (West Coast) and the occasional Tony Ribas series (Elegant Angel)-see EXXXplosion and Leg Love- is that there will be shots of the entire woman's body while she is getting fucked. It's just not shown enough and IMO it's one of the best shots in porn. Sometimes I like to watch the entire female having sex, legs and all. It does not have to be through the whole movie but at least put some in there. How often do you see the woman's legs when she is having sex in a porn, .001% of the time, showing the entire woman's body is a very underused shot, but one of the best. It looks so damn sexy yet no one shows it. I compare it to porn photography, why is it that when I flip through a good porn photo shoot (let's say a suze randall shoot) 90% of the time the womans entire body is shown, they don't cut the photo off at the girls upper thigh, why do they do it in porn movies? I just don't get it. Edited by - M.B. on 11/4/2002 3:44:40 PM  [Link] |
P-Knuckle Member
309 Posts 11/01
| Posted - Nov 4 2002 : 4:06PM
Murray Head, I have a great series for you, unfortuntely only one is dvd. Its called 'eye contact' and its filmed like Rodney Moore but its by homegrown video. Also, try to find Rodney Moores old 'pussyfest of the northwest' series. They are amazing! [Link] |
menace Member
Of all the fishes in the sea, the mermaid is the one for me! 410 Posts 6/02
| Posted - Nov 4 2002 : 9:48PM
P-Knuckle--wasn't that Northwest Pecker Trek? (or is Pussyfest another series?) How To Make a Model & High Heeled & Horny were good earlier Rodney series too.*I just checked rame-I see I missed the Pussyfest titles. Edited by - menace on 11/4/2002 9:53:40 PM  [Link] |
cal444 Independent Editor CalCutterPost.com
927 Posts 10/01
| Posted - Nov 5 2002 : 12:30AM
Sex moves the camera has to move to capture the action at hand. In stills you pose a girl for hours just to get that perfect shot. People fucking move around so does the camera person if thier any good.Cal Somewhere  [Link] |
M.B. Senior Member
1679 Posts 2/01
| Posted - Nov 5 2002 : 1:28PM
If other camera men can capture the entire woman's body in a scene, why can't some of the companies that shoot gonzo too? Also, if you look at a suzerandall shoot, the hardcore photos are taken while the people are actually having sex, they just pause for a few seconds so that the picture can be taken. I know this because on suze's site they have video of the actual shoots. It's like a scene from a porn except they pause for a few second's so that the camera man/woman can get the shot without there being a blur from the movement. With more than one camera shooting a scene I still see no reason why a shot showing the woman's entire body cannot be captured. If Brandon and Tony can do it why can't anybody else. [Link] |
Ramsey Senior Member
Trina Michaels fan 10332 Posts 10/02
| Posted - Nov 5 2002 : 1:33PM
I'm a huge Rodney Moore fan and nobody shoots better POV while have sex than Rodney. I admit that Anabolic gets hotter chicks but Rodney shoots better sex in my opinion. [Link] |