Are there any good pornos out there that feature genuine true 18-20 year old runaways from home? and not acted out ones
Is a runaway fetish normal for guys? or would u say its kinda sick?
[Link]
nietzsche Deactivated User
5470 Posts 8/03
Posted - Jan 15 2005 : 7:31AM
I don't think there are any real boundaries between "fetish" and "normal" these days...at least not on this board.
To address your original request, anyone over 18 would by definition not be a runaway, as the term only applies to minors. After 18 you're just plain old on your own. . . . .
I'd say that a certain amount of porn produced features such girls. They'd just be mixed in the performer pool with everyone else though.It's far from the worst thing I've read on this forum, but then again you've kinda answered for yourself in the question...
Consent is at the heart of normal human social interaction, especially where sex is concerned, which is perhaps why so many people, both men and women enjoy fantasies involving non-consenual sexual encounters. The consensus amung mental health professionals is that such fantasies are natural and normal when enjoyed within the boundries of consent when real live human beings are involved.
But a hard session of master and slave play with your wife is one thing; enjoying watching someone being unwillingly be sexually tortured is another. Enjoying watching knowing that someone is in a sex film because they are at the of their rope is akin to the latter, not the former.
Fetishizing the idea of sexually explicit videos containing young women who are desparate straights, and whose participation in these videos is at least an act of desparation, if not out right coersion is an indication of a desire for actual non-consensual sexual interaction with another human being (mediated by technology), and smacks of a poorly socialized individual.
But before condemning yours as an utterly wasted life, I will add on caveat:
Normally we don't have to believe that what we are seeing in a movie is real in order to enjoy and be effected by the film. People pretend to shoot people who pretend to die, and we are happy or sad or excited without actually believing that anyone actually died making the movie.
But pornography is so bad at creating a transparent experience for the viewer, that probably the only way to enjoy a pornographic depiction of your run-away fantasy is to believe that the women in question are actual real life runaways. At least in this respect, porn has failed you.
I guess porn fails people all in different ways...because theres no way a porn can totally satisfy 100% of the persons sexual fullfillment...
As far as my fetish with runaways. I diagree with you tony that it is the 'latter'...Because even though the runaway is at the end of her ropes she is still consenting...I find this no different than a new girl who starts stripping at the strip bar...Yes there is some coersion, but it is still her choice... The attraction I find in runaways is there is a level of innocence that cannot be had with regular porn girls or faked runaway films...Whereas a regular porn worker usually becomes very callous and hard, and her innocence is thrown down the drain which for me is a turnoff. But yes, as far as a true runaway sex film, porn has failed me...
If you're saying that there's a sort of hot pink fishnets styling and attitude that dominates production design in the world of porn, and that it is tiresome, you won't get any argument from me. I like vinyl as much as the next buy, but there are a lot of other ways for a woman (young or old) to express her eagerness for sex besides wearing Frankenhooker shoes and trashy club wear.
But as I said before, fetishing the idea of sweet girls doing hardcore because they're desparate and feel like they have no choice is just weird. A forty year old woman who been fucked every night of the week and twice in the ass on Sunday can still be filled with innocense, curiousity and wonder when it comes to sex – and who couldn't use a little more innocense, curiousity and wonder in their lives, especially in our sexlives!
But there are better ways to get it than at the expense of someone who is truly down on their luck.
[/quote] A forty year old woman who been fucked every night of the week and twice in the ass on Sunday can still be filled with innocense, curiousity and wonder when it comes to sex -T.C. [/quote]
I disagree..At least in my book not true innocense
I think for a women to exibit a true innocence she must be naive, inexpereinced, quiet, not many sexual partners or a virgin, and non abrasive. As well as in a lowered position, such as a runaway. In this position she is humbled to the ultimate degree, and that is where her true innocense comes out..Beggars cant be Choosers...'that' is what I like..
The problem is that this type of innocence is usually thrown down the drain at a very young age with todays women...and that is why I want to see it more....because Im so damn tired of abrasive, hard, money oriented, disobediant, loud mouthed, club-going typish women...
Renton405 wroteWomen are never truly innocent, by the time they get to 18 or 20 they know where their power is. It's in reducing men to a life support system for an erection.
quote]Lookin' for love in all the wrong places . . . And what reason would anybody have to be obedient? [/quote]
No reason...But obedient women are more femenine and innocent... Isnt fememenity in its essence supossed to be soft, caring, warm, obedient, and non abrasive???
No reason...But obedient women are more femenine and innocent... Isnt fememenity in its essence supossed to be soft, caring, warm, obedient, and non abrasive???
Or a slave. I have known many feminine women who weren't in the least bit obidient, not that I ever tried to find out. Had too much fun the way things were.
Ephesians 5:22-24 Wives, submit to your husbands as to the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church, his body, of which he is the Savior. Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit to their husbands in everything.
Sadly, producers will never be able to do credible explicit story telling until mainstream outlets are open to showing cunts and cocks and jizz. Until explicit films can garner the kind of professional recognition and money available to non-explicit films there will be no way to attract the money or talent needed to produce these engaging stories, and porn will remain a penny-ante game where success is measured two our three thousand discs at a time.
It's sad, isn't it?
I can easily envision a sexually explicit story line in which a young wafe from a troubled background meets a kindly, older, and yes, slightly domineering man who opens her up to the possiblity of sex being a wonderful, joyous, and powerfully connecting experience between two people. In my mind's eye I can see what it would look like, how it would be photographed and even how the story ends (Here's a hint: he ends up alone.) And yes, some of the power dynamics between the young girl and her older lover would be a little edgy. One person wanting to control another person with her consent but against her will us usually edgy territory. (Also, I'm still not sure there's any way to put a ten minute stroke scene in the middle of a narritive story without ruining both. I'm studying musicals for inspiration.)
But even if such a story could be produced it's rediculous and somewhat disturbing to think that the only way an audience could be move is if they truly believed that the woman playing the part of the waif was from a desparate and disadvantaged background. Can you imagine if we expected/needed this from all movies? (My wife and I watched Saving Private Ryan on our new six speaker home theater system. Upsetting enough knowing full well it's all make believe!)
For the time being we're going to have to be satisfied with BTS footage and other quasi reality devices to get any real and/or believable sense of character or context.
I think the ony way rent'is going to see what he wants is if some real pimp puts out his own home movies of the young runaways he acquires.
I think just because a woman is a certain age or even sexually experienced doesn't mean she still can't be somewhat innocent and naive.It's not like all women become empowered and assertive and all knowing at 25.Some of them are still shy,naive,inexperienced,etc.Oh sorry I was talking about myself.
I personally do like the fantasy of "innocence lost"in porn.That's why I really like to see new girls,and my fetish of anal/dp,because it's not the norm for most.I love thinking"she's so cute,she's like that 18 year old that works at Subway,now she's gonna take a DP from two big black guys?"The subtext that many of these girls,but months ago were in high school and now this cutie has a dick in her ass and is swallowing the cum of some guy she met only an hour or so ago,is very erotic to me.
Of course I think all of these scenarios are more erotic because I am very inexperienced sexually,so I don't fully understand my own or others sexuality.Although I understand and can appreciate the idea that having sex on film,mulitple partners in real life or sex for money,in the grand scheme of things shouldn't be EVIIIILLLLLLL!!!-there is also that part of me that thinks"I wonder what's going through her head now,she's got 3 guys jacking off in her mouth."
The closest thing to your idea I've found is,(Don't throw anything!)Ed Powers.You'll find alot of intersting girls in his vids,and their stories.Of course Ed tries to downplay or censor some of them when they want to say"I'm here for the money",there is that.And you can see alot of the girls aren't sure if what they are doing is right for them.
It was mentioned awhile ago in another thread about one particular Ed video.I found it,with the whole background of the girl,to be very erotic.The girl was probably in her mid 20's or so,very nervous,and she decided to get into porn to make some money so she could get out of her mother's house and support her kids.You can clearly see the"this is what it's come to?"look on her face.She even talks about how she feels it's prostituting herself(well duh!)and she doesn't think she'll last long because she doesn't like to do oral.
Heh,I won't tell you how it turns out but I found it amusing.She does Ed,and I think she went on to make less than a handful of other vids.
IAFD, supporters of beastiality. Just say no. 7564 Posts 11/02
Posted - Jan 16 2005 : 5:36PM
That only leaves seeing Loraine in a "lowered position" (that means on her hands and knees, right?). I am sure that there are plenty in favor of this motion. Who's with me?
Em said: "I have a well-developed aversion to renting just about anything (including a living accomodation). Perhaps that is just a caveman's atavism..."
Yes I am going more for the biblical definition of femenine(Isnt the bible the ultimate 'truth' anyway?)...In biblical pictures the women in art are drawn as soft, caring, warm, affectionate, loving, etc. Unfortunatly in the real world this is the exact opposite.
But I THINK women these days are going against their femeninity on purpose because they crave the power position of the man role. So in turn, they act more abrasive, swear alot, become callous, alterior motived, usually divorced later on, and very arrogant and disrespectful....Women really should just lay it down and accept their femenine roots rather than fight it...I think its the main reason for all the divorces in this country
To each his (or her) own I guess. I personally find the idea revolting. Sex on camera is sordid enough without the knowledge that what one is witnessing is coercion ;a ruthless exploitation of someone in an even more vulnerable position than the girls who "voluntarily" join the industry.
Innocence is a beautiful thing. I'd rather someone who has it, kept it. And I'd certainly never want to see it violated and lost to a pimp with a camera.
I guess I have a different view on it than men do tho'.
I agree with you on this part Danielle. The idea of someone being forced to have sex, whether by financial pressure or any other way, is completely revolting. So this is one man who shares your view on that.
On this one, I do disagree. For me it's more like: Innocence is a correctable fault. I'd rather someone who has it, cures it.
Innocence can get you cheated by con men, infected with HIV, killed in a car smash. It can make you vote for murderous dictators. I really don't see what use it is to anybody.
Much, probably most porn is sordid. But there is nothing inherently sordid about sex on camera. The camera does not have the capacity to make a rendering sordid. The person welding the camera might have such this power.
I don't see that you view about not enjoying actually coersive sex is any different from the view held by men that I know. Maybe you should find some better men to hang out with.
I think you might be confusing innocence, a relatively abstract concept, on the definition of which we could have differences, with naivete. Naive behavior is of course, potentially dangerous. Innocence to me is more a state of mind than a type of behavior.
If you consider your point about voting for murderous dictators, the people who voted in Hitler, Mussolini (and some might add, "perhaps the second Bush term") were far from innocent. They were, or are, naive. The two don't go hand in hand.